October 1 - 31, 2026: Issue 659

 

Long Billed Corella - Little Corella Hybrid: Careel Bay

Long Billed Corella - Careel Bay, October 2026. Photo: A J Guesdon.

This is a new young one we haven't seen here before, possibly born this year, and is smaller (Little Corella size) than other Long Billed Corellas seen in Pittwater.

Long-billed Corellas (Cacatua tenuirostris) and Little Corellas (Cacatua sanguinea) occasionally hybridise in areas where their ranges overlap, such as urban parks and communal feeding grounds in south-eastern Australia

The Long-billed Corella is a medium-sized white cockatoo with a short crest (not always visible), short tail, stocky body and a distinctive long upper bill. They have a faint yellowish wash on the undersides of its wings and tail; orange-red splashes on its forehead and throat; and an orange-red crescent across its upper breast. The eye ring is pale grey-blue. They form monogamous pairs and both parents prepare the nest, incubate the eggs and feed the young. Nests are made in the hollows of large old eucalypts, and sometimes in cavities of loose gravelly cliffs. The eggs are laid on a lining of decayed wood.

Council to investigate Protecting Vital Ingleside wildlife corridor near Mona Vale Rd. fauna bridge

The Northern Beaches Council has announced it has agreed to progress a proposal to strengthen the long-term protection of the Ingleside wildlife corridor, including seeking the transfer of identified State-owned land to Council and to rezone it for environmental conservation.

The land is part of a corridor that links Ku-ring-gai Chase National Park, Katandra Bushland Sanctuary and Ingleside Chase Reserve, while also connecting habitat to Irrawong Reserve and Warriewood Wetlands.

A preliminary council assessment found the area contains largely intact native bushland in good condition and provides important habitat connectivity. The Ingleside corridor contains habitat that supports, or has the potential to support, more than 30 threatened species from the local area. Native vegetation within the corridor also includes areas of coastal upland swamp, an endangered ecological community.

Mayor Sue Heins said protecting the corridor would help safeguard valuable bushland and support wildlife movement across the area.

“This is a rare opportunity to strengthen protection for an important wildlife corridor and preserve habitat that supports threatened species.

“Keeping this bushland connected is also vital to the continued success of the fauna overpass and underpasses delivered as part of the Mona Vale Road East upgrade,” Mayor Heins said.

Fauna overpass on Mona Vale Road East looking towards Ingleside Chase Reserve   Photo D Palmer

Under the proposal, the council stated it would formally express interest in identified land parcels being transferred to the council from the NSW Office of Strategic Lands (OSL) and seek agreement to apply a C2 Environmental Conservation zone under council’s Local Environmental Plan.

A C2 zoning would provide a higher level of environmental protection than the currently proposed C3 Environmental Management zone by prohibiting dwelling houses and other uses that could affect the corridor’s environmental values.

“Council ownership could provide greater certainty for the corridor’s long-term protection and enable active management including bushland regeneration, weed control and hazard reduction,” Mayor Heins said.

“We’d like to acknowledge Pittwater Natural Heritage Association for its diligence in promoting the benefits and importance of the Ingleside Wildlife Corridor.

“Before any decision is made, Council would undertake detailed due diligence so the community can be confident the environmental benefits, risks and long-term costs have been carefully considered.”

The investigations would examine terms of land transfer, whole-of-life financial impacts, funding requirements, bushfire management obligations, contamination and geotechnical risks. A further report would be presented to the council before any land transfer is finalised, the council stated.

If the land is transferred to the council, it will require reclassification in accordance with the provisions of the Local Government Act 1993. Should the land be transferred to Council, it is intended that it would become Community Land and be categorised as Natural Area - Bushland, meaning that it will not be able to be sold but will be retained for conservation and sustainable community use. 

Prior to the October 2026 council meeting two members of PNHA spoke in support of saving the wildlife corridor.

Jacqui Marlow:

I want to speak about why preserving bushland connectivity is essential for the new wildlife overpass and Mona Vale Road East and protecting what the community community values.

According to the council's state of well-being 2026 report, living in a beautiful natural environment surrounded by bushland and wildlife ranked as equal first amongst 16 attributes contributing to community well-being.

This demonstrates just how much community value the community values the natural environment and the wildlife that makes the northern beaches such a special place to live. Protecting bushland is about protecting habitat and wildlife corridors that allow native animals and plants to survive and thrive. The northern beaches is home to hundreds of native species, so regional biodiversity corridors are very important. 

If you look at this map that's on page 178 of the agenda, you can see from the north where there is Ku-ring-gai National Park down through Katandra Bushland, then through Ingleside Chase and down to Narrabeen Lagoon catchment, there is a corridor of high biodiverse land.

This area of connected bushland forms an important regional biodiversity corridor. It allows animals and plants to spread through the landscapes, maintain healthy populations, and recolonise areas when local populations have disappeared. Without these connections, bushlands become pockets of isolation, and the  populations sin these pockets will become increasingly vulnerable and genetic diversity can decline and species will eventually become locally extinct. 

The importance of these corridors is particularly evident on the northern beaches where roads and urban development have progressively fragmented the natural landscape. A major habitat connection between the Narrabeen Lagoon catchment and the Manly Dam catchment has been broken by the Warringah Road upgrade near the [northern beaches] hospital.

This fragmentation makes remaining corridors even more valuable. We cannot afford to lose any more bushland that links our natural areas. 

The wildlife overpass must remain connected to surrounding bushland. 

A wildlife overpass can't be considered in isolation from the surrounding landscape. An overpass surrounded or disconnected with through cleared habitat will have limited value. 

The overpass must be connected to substantial areas of native vegetation reserves to to restore a functioning wildlife corridor.

David Palmer:

Thank you. Jacqui and I are both members of Pittwater Natural Heritage Association and our association been campaigning on this matter for quite some years.

We're pleased to know that the council has been listening and is taking action.

That is why we ask you to support the recommendation in the staff report so that staff can continue to work towards preservation of this environmentally valuable land.

The land we're concerned about is located adjacent to the Mona Vale Road East for Bridge and Underpass in Ingleside and the environmental significance of this land was recognised in 2016 when a plan for residential subdivision in Ingleside was released.

The land was classified in the release document as environmental protection. The intention being that it be conserved for a fauna corridor and managed for conservation.

This decision was based on thorough research and led to transport for New South Wales decision to build a fauna crossing or a couple of fauna crossings on Mona Vale Road East. So now we have our Fauna crossings.

We've got an overpass and underpass, but the bush land needed to support them has an uncertain future because, despite of the recognition of the environmental value of the land, we find that in the new LEP, it is planned to be zoned C3, which allows the construction of houses.

But if the land is zone C3 in the new LEP, would it be suitable for housing?

Well, we say no. And this is because the land's in a bushfire area; it has no water or sewer services, the roads are narrow and are unsuitable for egress during bushfire events, and the lands in the upper catchment of two local creeks, Mullet Creek and Narrabeen Creek, as bushland, contributes to flood mitigation water quality protection and the downstream environmental health in the Warriewood Valley.

The C3 zoning would enable uses that would harm the environmental functions required to support long-term viability of Ingleside Chase Reserve and the functioning of the fauna crossings on Mona Vale Road East. 

We ask you to support the recommendation in the report to council and most importantly we believe that the recommendation outlines a prudent responsible approach which does which does not commit council to accepting the land on unfavourable terms.

Item 11.6: 'Investigate Options for Protection of Ingleside Wildlife Corridor' was passed unanimously.

Swamp Wallaby crossing  Mona Vale Rd East on the fauna bridge. Photo supplied

Eastern Pygmy possum near the fauna bridge on Mona Vale Road East. Photo David Palmer

The bridge was installed in August 2023. Next day the road was open and later the bridge was planted with native plants. 

The bridge lies between bushland lots owned by NSW State Government.  A permanent fauna corridor through this must be established. 

See February 2026 report: The fauna bridge on Mona Vale Road East – will it be a bridge to nowhere?

March 2026: Council - local politicians back Ingleside fauna corridor land campaign: Update March 2026

Background

In 2014 Pittwater Natural Heritage Association, Wildlife Roadkill Prevention Association (Northern Beaches) and Katandra Bushland Sanctuary Trust began campaigning to connect threatened bushland reserves in the Pittwater area in a bid to help stop the decline of our native fauna.

According to information gathered by local wildlife volunteers in 2015 – 2016 over 53 wallabies died on Mona Vale Road between Terrey Hills and Mona Vale. Although Wallabies were counted as an indicator species, many other native species have also died on Mona Vale Road, including possums and echidnas. These distressing statistics sparked members of these community groups into calling for action to reduce roadkill on this road.

In May 2016, when the National Parks and Wildlife Amendment (Adjustment of Areas) Bill 2016 was passed on Tuesday, May 31st, 2016 part of the speeches during the Reading of this Bill focused on the necessity to make provision for a fauna bridge or bridges.

In September 2017, after years of lobbying NSW Roads and Maritime Services to get more fauna underpasses and overpasses included in the upgrade of Mona Vale Road East, Jacqui Marlow, Marita Macrae and David Palmer of Pittwater Natural Heritage Association were told at a meeting with NSW Roads and Maritime Services that the fauna crossings they had been campaigning for were now included in the final plans for the eastern section of the road upgrade.

This completed the suite of fauna road crossings that have been planned for the upgraded Mona Vale Road between Mona Vale and Terrey Hills. This included both sides of the road being fenced along its entire length to guide native animals to the crossing sites.

In March 2018 the officially announcement confirming the MVR West Upgrade fauna bridge was made.

There were actually 4 fauna passes - 2 for East and 2 for West - 2 x bridges and 2 x underpass, as stated in 2018. This is the result of work by PNHA and WRPA in concert with the great staff at Transport for NSW/RMS over a few years - they commenced talks about this soon after the project was announced - along with support and backing from former Pittwater MP Rob Stokes.

More in: 


Photo: David Palmer, Jacqui Marlow and Marita Macrae celebrate the June 2017 announcement of a fauna bridge to be built over Mona Vale Rd East. 

 

Photo: August 19 2023 - Jacqui Marlow, David Palmer and Marita Macrae celebrate the installation of the MVR East Upgrade fauna bridge supports.

The Wildlife Roadkill Prevention Association aims to reduce the roadkill of native animals on the Northern Beaches of Sydney, Australia. In 2005, the association was formed to address wildlife roadkill and raise awareness of broader conservation issues for our area.

The Pittwater Natural Heritage Association was formed to act to protect and preserve the Pittwater areas major and most valuable asset - its natural heritage.

Pittwater Natural Heritage Association seeks to raise awareness and provide information and advice to members on issues such as:

Find out more and become a member at: https://pnha.org.au

Tougher Penalties for Tree Killers to be Introduced by NSW Government

On Tuesday October 20 the Minns Labor Government announced it is cracking down on illegal tree clearing, introducing tougher penalties for vandals and greater enforcement powers for councils.

How this will work in with their other recent announcement via the 'Community Participation Plan' for developments, which commenced on September 1, wherein 'Development types excluded from public exhibition' includes trees being removed on private land - and with so many claiming the trees they killed were on their land, including local nesting sites for powerful owls while the bubs were still in the hollow - may well be tested.

The government states the tougher measures are a direct response to recent cases of tree vandalism and illegal tree removal which have drawn community anger.

'While councils already have the option to pursue criminal charges for serious tree clearing offences, the requirement to prove such an offence beyond reasonable doubt and the costs involved means successful prosecutions have been rare.' the government stated

'These reforms will create stronger deterrents to illegal tree clearing and give councils more options to pursue penalties that reflect the seriousness of the offence.'

'Legislation will be introduced to NSW Parliament to allow councils to pursue hefty civil penalties for tree vandals on both public and private land for the first time.'

'It means individuals caught illegally clearing trees and vegetation could face court-imposed penalties of up to $500,000 and corporations up to $2.5 million.' the government said

The government stated in parallel regulatory changes will:

  • Double on-the-spot fines from $3,000 to $6,000 for individuals and triple fines for businesses from $6,000 to $18,000 for clearing trees and vegetation without necessary approvals.
  • Allow councils to issue orders to stop tree clearing works and enforce replanting.
  • Introduce permit requirements for removing dead and dying trees to eliminate incentives to poison trees.

'The reforms build on the Minns Labor Government’s $60 million investment to green urban areas and increase tree canopy to reduce heat and improve local amenity.' the government said

Research shows trees can reduce ground-level temperatures by up to six degrees, while communities with more than 30 per cent canopy-cover experience improved mental and physical health outcomes.

NSW Minister for Planning and Public Spaces, the Hon. Paul Scully, said:

“Communities across NSW are rightly fed up with seeing their local trees poisoned and ripped out of their neighbourhoods for someone else’s convenience or profit and councils are fed up with having to clear such a high legal bar when pursuing those who have done the wrong thing.

“These reforms deliver tougher penalties and stronger powers giving councils more options to stop this illegal behaviour and better protect the trees and vegetation that make neighbourhoods a great place to live.

“This is another example of the Minns Labor Government making common sense reforms to build better and more sustainable communities.”


The Council Reserve in Pittwater cleared by contractors employed by private landowners in 2020 where a pair of nesting Powerful Owls abandoned the nest, with the chicks still in it. The chocks died as a result. Photo supplied

Great Koala National Park Legislation Finally passes NSW Parliament

Announced: Friday October 23 2026

Landmark legislation to create the Great Koala National Park has passed NSW Parliament, delivering on a key election commitment of the Minns Government and securing lasting protection for one of the state’s most significant koala populations, the government announced on Friday.

The National Park Estate (Great Koala National Park Reservations) Bill 2026, An Act to transfer certain land, including State forest and Crown land, to the national park estate for the purpose of creating the Great Koala National Park; to make provision for continuing access to transferred land and other land in the same areas as the transferred land; and for related purposes, passed the lower house on October 21st and the upper house the following day.

''The passage of the legislation, combined with the Clean Energy Regulator’s approval of the park’s carbon project, clears the final hurdles to establishing the Great Koala National Park, which is on track to open before the end of the year.'' the government stated

'The National Park Estate (Great Koala National Park Reservations) Bill 2026 adds 178,000 hectares of state forest and other Crown land, home to around 12,000 koalas and more than 100 other threatened species, to the national parks estate.

This precious forest will be added to existing national park reserves on the NSW Mid North Coast, creating one of the largest protected areas in NSW, spanning more than 475,000 hectares.'

'The creation of the Great Koala National Park continues the proud Labor conservation legacy of the Wran and Carr governments, which protected vast areas of NSW’s native forests and secured their conservation for future generations.'

'The park will protect important environmental and cultural values while allowing visitors to continue enjoying activities including camping, canoeing and mountain-bike riding. It will also create opportunities for nature-based tourism and local businesses.'

'The NSW Government is supporting workers, businesses and communities affected by the transition of this land, with a comprehensive assistance package including redundancy payments, support, retraining, upskilling and other financial assistance.'

'Around 100 new NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS) roles are being created to strengthen park operations, fire management and conservation. The Bill provides for affected Forestry Corporation of NSW employees to transition into suitable NPWS roles if they choose.

The creation of the park follows extensive consultation with industry, community and Aboriginal groups. The Minns Labor Government is incredibly grateful for their time and expertise.

The Gumbaynggirr and Dunghutti people have helped shape the Great Koala National Park and will continue to guide its management. Eight Aboriginal rangers will be employed through community-controlled organisations and some park roles will be identified for Aboriginal people.' the government stated

The Great Koala National Park is also the culmination of decades of campaigning by environmental groups up and down the coast, including supporters here in Pittwater.

''The Clean Energy Regulator’s registration of the carbon project associated with the Great Koala National Park under the Improved Native Forest Management method provides a pathway for carbon revenue to support the long-term conservation and management of these forests. Carbon credits generated through the project will not be available to coal and gas projects.' the Minns Government said

Minister for the Environment, the Hon. Penny Sharpe, said:

“This is a defining moment for conservation in NSW. After more than a decade of campaigning and years of detailed assessments, consultation and planning, we have cleared the final hurdles to delivering our biggest environmental commitment.

“We are protecting extraordinary forests that are home to thousands of koalas and more than 100 threatened species, while ensuring future generations can enjoy these incredible places.

“I want to acknowledge the Traditional Owners, conservation groups, local communities and everyone who has worked so hard for so many years to see these forests protected.”

Minister for Agriculture and Regional NSW Tara Moriarty said:

“We know creating the Great Koala National Park means significant change for forestry workers. We have been clear from the start that affected workers and businesses will receive practical support through this transition, and that will continue.

“We have a comprehensive assistance package in place, including financial support and retraining opportunities. This legislation also gives eligible Forestry Corporation workers a pathway to move into a role with national parks if they want to take their valuable skills and local knowledge.”

Minister for Small Business and the North Coast Janelle Saffin said:

“Like so many in our region, I just love our native wildlife and iconic koalas. This is a historic day for our North Coast community, who helped shape a national park that protects our environment while keeping the outdoor activities we love accessible.

“This milestone isn’t just a win for conservation – it’s also an economic driver. Opening the Great Koala National Park will attract visitors from around the world, creating fresh opportunities, vibrant town centres and lasting growth for our hard-working local small businesses.”

Alex Greenwich, MP for Sydney, stated during the Second Reading Debate:

''I strongly welcome the National Park Estate (Great Koala National Park Reservations) Bill 2026. The Great Koala National Park will be a legacy that will not only save koalas and other threatened species on the Mid North Coast from extinction but also become a global nature attraction that we can all be proud of. ''

''Sixty-six threatened fauna species, including the yellow-bellied glider, greater glider, powerful owl, sooty owl and glossy black cockatoo, and 37 threatened flora species also live within the new park boundary and rely on the natural habitat for survival. New South Wales has one of the worst records of biodiversity loss in the world because of our appalling clearing rates. Climate change is adding further pressure on native species and ecological communities, and we need to preserve what is left before the natural environment is so eroded that it can no longer sustain life. Deforestation will cease within the boundaries of the Great Koala National Park. The region will no longer be cleared for wood harvesting, with the priority now to protect and enhance the land.

There are concerns that some areas of high conservation land will be designated vested land instead of formal national park reservation, but leases in place prevent reservation at this stage. I understand that the government will work to acquire the land to preserve as national park or nature reserve, and in the meantime mining, logging or other clearing will not occur within those boundaries. There are also concerns about regional parks, which will continue to permit high-intensity recreational activities. I will monitor the impacts on koalas, but I acknowledge that those activities are important to the local community and progress requires us to bring the community along with us on the conservation journey.

Forestry workers will not be left behind. A comprehensive support package including payouts, retraining and access to financial and legal services is available. The National Parks and Wildlife Service will be able to recruit forestry workers without a competitive process, acknowledging the advantages they will bring to the park from their local knowledge and experience. I understand that the National Parks and Wildlife Service will have 100 additional positions. Grants will support tourism and local business growth, building on the increase in visitors expected from a new national park.

Last year I visited the region with my Independent colleagues the member for Pittwater and the member for Wakehurst. We heard from local businesses excited about the opportunities the park will bring. My electorate has many nature lovers who plan to visit the park and support its local economy. The Great Koala National Park is taking advantage of the substantial local First Nations knowledge and connection to country, and the rich cultural and traditional history that goes back to time immemorial. Aboriginal advisory panels have been part of the establishment of boundaries and reservations, and First Nations communities will continue to play a crucial role in the management of the park through two new Aboriginal areas and the Aboriginal ranger positions. Visitors will be able to learn about and celebrate places of significance.

I support the use of the carbon credit program to realise the Great Koala National Park. It has provided a pathway for conservation that protects communities and supports jobs, and I hope that can be a model for further protection in other areas, like the South Coast. The planet is becoming increasingly unliveable. Native land clearing rates are escalating, land and water is being poisoned, and global warming is having frightening impacts on the weather system. Mass extinction of flora and fauna and the natural systems that protect life remains a threat. We need to protect 30 per cent of the planet by 2030 to safeguard our future wellbeing. The Great Koala National Park will take us a step closer to 30 by 30, which is a global target that Australia has committed to.''

MP for Pittwater Jacqui Scruby stated:

''In my inaugural speech in this place I said, in relation to the people of Pittwater:

As fierce protectors of our own tree canopy, so too are we calling for the establishment of the long overdue Great Koala National Park and an end to native forest logging. It does not make financial sense, subsidised by the taxpayer, and it does not make environmental sense either.

This park makes environmental sense. It makes economic sense as well. And economic sense is important. The Blueprint Institute, whose strategic council included the late Bruce Baird, has undertaken extensive research into the economic benefits of environmental protection, including multiple reports on native forest logging. I have stood alongside former MPs, including the Hon. Rob Stokes, at the launch of these reports. One of the institute's papers states:

Australian state governments have long subsidised the native logging industry, despite persistent mounting financial losses and clear warning signs of the industry's deteriorating business model. State governments across the political spectrum hold a long and unenviable record of channelling taxpayer funds to subsidise and prop up failing and unprofitable state-owned forestry firms.

In my electorate, and in communities across New South Wales, people do not want taxpayer money funding the destruction of our native habitat. In Pittwater we know what it means to lose our koalas from urban encroachment. In 1993 our koala population was estimated at just six koalas. We now have no koalas. Our community still lives with reminders of their existence, such as road signs urging motorists to slow down for the koalas that are no longer there. The signs remind us of what is at stake when habitat is lost and fragmented, and development, land clearing and logging push wildlife out. Although we may not be able to bring back Pittwater's koalas, the bill before the House today provides an opportunity to prevent that same loss elsewhere in New South Wales.

In 2019 a parliamentary inquiry made findings—including some contentious findings—that koalas would become extinct before 2050 without government intervention, that logging in public native forests had cumulative impacts on koalas over many years, and that the NSW Koala Strategy at that time fell short of the Chief Scientist's recommendation for a whole-of-government strategy to stabilise and then increase koala numbers. Koalas face habitat loss, modification and fragmentation; vehicle strikes; feral animals; intense fires; disease; and heat stress. Isolated populations and gaps in our understanding of their movements and habitat needs compound those threats. But this park will provide them with protection. It is not just about our national icon, the koala, but also about the entire ecosystem.

Over 50 per cent of our threatened mammal species live within the proposed boundaries of the park, and they all rely on mature, unfragmented canopy to survive. The park will protect habitat for an estimated 12,000 koalas, 36,000 gliders and more than 100 threatened species of plants and animals. Of course, it is right to support forestry workers who are impacted throughout the transition. In the transition package, we must take seriously and protect the livelihoods of the workers and their families in those regional communities. Over 300 workers will be impacted across six regional timber mills. Enabling Forestry Corporation workers to move to suitable roles with the National Parks and Wildlife Service will help to retain local skills and knowledge. Alongside First Nations leadership and knowledge, those skills will help us care for country and manage the forests into the future.

There is always a balance to strike between conservation and other land uses. The importance of outdoor recreation has been acknowledged as the bill has progressed, including four-wheel driving and motor racing events on existing roads in regional parks, in appropriate circumstances. Although carbon credits remain contentious, the improved forest management method has helped to make this outcome possible. It offers an economic return for protecting those forests. However, as other members have noted, there are valid criticisms of those methods. In this debate we must also acknowledge the tourism benefits and iconic nature of the Great Koala National Park. The project should indeed be celebrated. The Government is now delivering on its 2015 announcement and its 2023 election commitment, although it is fairly late.

The park comes in response to scientists who identified that area of critical habitat. The economic value of that nature and its conservation will benefit regional communities, including the businesses I have met with. Destination NSW research highlights that Australia's demand for nature-based tourism grew by 47 per cent between 2014 and 2023. It is recognised as a driver of our visitor economy. Earlier in this term of government, I travelled to the Mid North Coast alongside my crossbench colleagues the member for Wakehurst and the member for Sydney to meet local environmental advocates, scientists, traditional custodians and regional business owners. They made clear that conservation and regional prosperity can go hand in hand.

More than 100 North Coast businesses have called for the creation of the Great Koala National Park because they know it represents a future of sustainable jobs, visitors and economic resilience through nature‑based tourism. During our trip, we met with some of those businesses. Subsequently, and together with some of those businesses, we presented the Premier with their letter of support here in Parliament House. The Great Koala National Park will be an incredible legacy of this Parliament for our State, for future generations and, of course, for wildlife. Above all, this is a community win that builds on decades of advocacy. I thank and acknowledge those who have supported and informed my own advocacy, including some of my constituents.

I thank Jenny Cullen of Scotland Island; Reverend Jason John, forest chaplain for the Uniting Church Koala Chaplaincy Project; Natalie Cuthbertson of Avalon Beach; Ashley Love of the Bellingen Environment Centre; Deanna Markovina of the Forest Ecology Alliance; Saul Deane of the Georges River koala network; Gill and Chris Yates of the Australian Conservation Foundation's northern beaches branch; Dr Grahame Douglas, AM, and all members of the National Parks and Wildlife Advisory Council; and Danielle Ryan and the National Parks Association of NSW, which has campaigned to protect 30 per cent of New South Wales' land and sea. I acknowledge also the National Parks Association Coffs Harbour branch, including its staff, members and campaign alliance; the Bellingen Environment Centre; the Nambucca Valley Conservation Association; the Clarence Environment Centre; and the North Coast Environment Council.

I thank local campaigners around Coffs Harbour and Bellingen, including those involved in the Pine Creek campaign, whose persistence helped to bring us to this moment. I acknowledge the Gumbaynggirr and Dunghutti peoples and the Aboriginal advisory panel, whose knowledge and enduring connection to country are central to the park's future. I thank the scientists and ecologists, particularly David Scotts, who established the evidence for protection as well as the local businesses and recreation groups that supported the campaign. I also acknowledge environment Minister Penny Sharpe and the New South Wales Government for delivering the Great Koala National Park. I thank the hundreds of others who contacted me about the project, including nearly 300 constituents. I foreshadow that I will move amendments to the bill to address the Forest Bridge proposal. To all those who have worked so hard, and for the generations who will inherit these forests, I commend the bill to the House.''

Pittwater MP's amendments

The MP for Pittwater also moved three amendments, stating in regards to these:

''In her second reading speech, the Parliamentary Secretary said that koala conservation is at the heart of this park's creation. In the 2019 koala population parliamentary inquiry, finding number 4 was that the fragmentation and loss of habitat pose the most serious threat to koala populations in New South Wales, and recommendations in that report focused on the need to protect nature corridors. These amendments go to the heart of those statements, findings and recommendations and are key to ensuring the integrity of the park and the population and diversity of the koalas and other fauna there.

The forest bridge, as I will refer to it, will preserve a key east-west linkage from the coast to the escarpment. Koalas require large areas for their survival and breeding. Male koalas in search of females roam the landscape, and logging key corridors disrupts the capacity of koalas to ensure that their local range is maintained. Even in Pittwater, we know the importance of wildlife corridors. They are part of the projects of Transport for NSW, including the long-awaited Mona Vale Road upgrades, which have now been funded and will be delivered soon. We know the importance of nature corridors, and this is a live issue in my electorate. It is even more important to have the corridors in the Great Koala National Park preserved for not only koalas but also all native species that inhabit the forests.

I have included a map. Compartments 15, 16 and 17 are identified as plantations. However, those areas also demonstrate mixed forests and function as such, and therefore warrant protection. I have visited those forests, and one does not need to be an expert to note the diversity of a mixed forest over that plantation. This is what I refer to as the forest bridge proposal. It extends opportunities for koalas to move from east to west and is core to these amendments. The compartments include riparian areas, which should be protected, and an extension to compartment 18, which the Government has included in the Great Koala National Park.

The community fought for decades to protect the bridge proposal. Compartments 22 and 23 have been lost due to logging. They would have been a north-south extension. When we lose connections, it takes a long time to get healthy country back, sometimes only for it to be logged again. Critically important is that adding compartments 15, 16 and 17 to the park will ensure its integrity. The area is known as a koala hub and was recognised as such by the former Government. The State forest estate is approximately 200,000 hectares in this region, and 178,000 hectares, including plantations, are going to the Great Koala National Park, leaving only about 22,000 hectares. Adding this small section I referred to previously will not have a major impact on the industry but will be critical for conservation. It is time for this bridge to come into the Bongil Bongil National Park.

I acknowledge the advocacy of the member for Balmain and support her amendments also. The proposed amendments I have moved include the Forest Bridge proposal. I wish to be clear that compartments 15, 16 and 17 are the key additions required now. This is a very modest amendment to the bill. The additional benefit in supporting this amendment is that converting this into national park means the National Parks and Wildlife Service will use its extensive knowledge and experience to manage the land. This is a unique opportunity. I acknowledge the Friends of Pine Creek for their strong advocacy in linking these two national parks with the Forest Bridge proposal.

I understand the Government will not support these amendments, but I would like a response as to why. The amendments will support connectivity and are focused only on a small amount of land. I seek these amendments on behalf of many advocacy groups, including people in my electorate who have contacted me to ensure that there is no fragmentation in this area. They want a connection to make sure the Great Koala National Park delivers on its objectives.''

Labor Parliamentary Secretary for Climate Change, Trish Doyle, MP for the Blue Mountains, stated in response:

''The Government does not support these amendments. The Government has been clear since 2023 that plantations will be excluded. Native forest areas of the Forest Bridge have been included in the park whilst plantation areas have largely been excluded, which is in line with the Government's commitment.''

Liberal MP for the North Shore, Felicity Wilson, responding on behalf of the Opposition, stated:

''I thank the member for Pittwater for her contribution this evening. I recognise her incredibly well-intentioned commitment to biodiversity, wildlife and the preservation of nature. The incorporation of this additional parcel into the Great Koala National Park is not something that the Opposition can support, which the member understands. As we have outlined throughout this debate, we believe the best way to preserve additional national park is not at the loss of more forestry areas and industry jobs. We do not support the removal of additional plantation lands, though we welcome the opportunity to discuss in the future other areas of biodiversity and conservation across New South Wales.''

Local Independent MP's have been active in supporting the establishment of this park, especially given the loss of Pittwater's koalas.

A few example reports:

Pittwater MP Jacqui Scruby, Sydney MP, Alex Greenwich, Wakehurst MP Michael Regan travelled to the site of the Great Koala Park earlier in 2025 to discuss with the human locals what they actually wanted.

NSW Greens, who chaired the Parliamentary Inquiry which confirmed koalas across New South Wales need habitat and connected  wildlife corridors to survive beyond 2050, along with seeing the National Party’s contentious Local Land Services Amendment (Miscellaneous) Bill 2020 fail to pass the NSW Upper House on Thursday, November 19th 2020, after Liberal MP Catherine Cusack crossed the floor to refer it to Inquiry, placed the establishment of the Great Koala Park firmly due to the work of thousands over decades.

Cate Faehrmann MP, who chaired the Koala populations and habitat in New South Wales Inquiry, along with Greens MP Sue Higginson, stated:

''I’m genuinely elated! After years of campaigning, the Great Koala National Park bill has just passed the Upper House and become law!! Protecting a massive 178,000 hectares of forests, home to our precious koalas and many other threatened species, from logging forever. This is such a massive win for our forests, our koalas, our community, our climate and planet. And it would never have happened without our wonderful movement of dedicated conservationists and forest campaigners who never gave up.

Thank you from the bottom of our hearts. You're SIMPLY THE BEST!!''


One of Pittwater's last koalas. The release of an 8 years old female back into Angophora Reserve after she had been bombarded by magpies. Taronga Zoo picked her up and nursed her back to health before the release on November 5th, 1989. Doug Bladen and Marita Macrae are in the background representing the Avalon Preservation Trust (now APA). Photo by Geoff Searl OAM

Photo: Koala in Mona Vale in 1958 from Australian Women's Weekly Article. Locals state Koalas were fairly common in the Manly Dam environs too, although the last verified sighting was circa 1996-98.

Koala signs along the routes they once travelled are still in Pittwater. Looking north towards Angophora Reserve, 2026

Previous PON reports:

Celebrate the Diversity of Pollinators: Art + Photography Comp. for Students

Australian Pollinator Week runs from 7–15 November and celebrates Australia’s diverse pollinators and highlights the importance of engaging young people in learning about pollinators. Schools are encouraged to celebrate and support pollinator health.

Australian Pollinator Week was founded by Dr Megan Halcroft, of Bees Business, in November 2015. It followed on from a community project called “Bee Aware of Your Native Bees”, which was funded by Western Sydney University and the Environmental Trust.

Communities in the northern hemisphere have been celebrating the importance of pollinators since June 2007, however, the seasonal differences in the southern hemisphere has restricted bilateral celebrations.

Australian Pollinator Week acknowledges our important and unique insect pollinators during Australia’s southern Spring (November). It is a designated week when communities, businesses and organisations can come together to raise awareness of the importance of pollinators and support their needs.

Through group activities, community members can learn together as they help to support pollinators. By engaging communities in schools, retirement villages, art groups, gardening clubs, community gardens, local council areas, Landcare groups and neighbourhoods we can increase awareness and act on our increased knowledge.

School Pollinator Art Competition

The School Pollinator Art Competition invites students across Australia to celebrate pollinators through art.

Students can submit original artworks in any medium, including drawing, painting, digital, collage or mixed media. Prizes will be awarded for the best artwork inspired by pollinators.

All entries will be judged by the Wheen Bee Foundation.

The competition is proudly sponsored by the Centre for Bee Education.

The School Pollinator Art Competition runs alongside the popular Pollinator Photography Competition and provides an accessible way for school-aged students to learn about pollinators. Find out more about the Pollinator Photography Competition here. 

The 2026 School Pollinator Art Competition is now open and entries will close Sunday 25 October at 5pm AEDT.

Prizes

Primary School Winner

  • Individual prize: A Bees Are Amazing gift hamper and certificate valued at more than $100
  • Teacher prize: A $500 Centre for Bee Education voucher, which can be given to a teacher of the winner’s choice.  

Secondary School Winner

  • Individual prize: A Bees Are Amazing gift hamper and certificate valued at more than $100
  • Teacher prize: A $500 Centre for Bee Education voucher, which can be given to a teacher of the winner’s choice.

Find out more and enter here

Join the School Pollinator Art Webinar

Join Amelie Ecology for a special webinar celebrating pollinators, art and this year’s School Pollinator Art Competition.

Students will learn more about Australia’s pollinators and the habitats they need, with artwork from this year’s competition featured throughout the session.

The Primary and Secondary School competition winners will also be announced live during the webinar.

Webinar Details:

Tuesday, 10 November 2026, 10am AEDT - Online

Registration is free. Register here

Example of prior art work: Bee on Honeycomb. Steve N. Year 2, NSW

Pollinator Photography Competition

The Pollinator Photography Competition encourages everyone to get out and capture images of bees and other pollinators in their local environment, whether it’s in a garden, park, school, on a nature strip or on a farm.

The competition will award prizes to the best pictures of bees and other pollinators taken in Australia as judged by the Australian Pollinator Week Pollinator Photography Competition Judging Panel.

The Pollinator Photography Competition runs alongside the School Pollinator Art Competition providing an accessible way for school-aged students to learn about pollinators. Find out more about the School Pollinator Art Competition here. 

The Competition will close Sunday 25 October at 5pm AEDT.

Prizes

  • First place wins $1500 
  • Second place wins $750
  • Third place wins $500 
  • People’s Choice wins $750
  • Video Category winner wins $750

Winners will be announced in the Pollinator Photography Webinar during Australian Pollinator Week on Thursday, 12 November at 7.30pm AEDT.

Find out more and enter here.

Pollinator Photography Webinar

Join a panel of experienced photographers as they share practical tips for capturing Australia’s pollinators and the stories behind some of their favourite images.

Learn how they approach photographing bees and other insects, including where and when to shoot, equipment and camera settings, and what makes a great pollinator photograph. There will also be an opportunity to ask the panel photography questions.

The webinar will also reveal the 2026 Pollinator Photography Competition winners, including the winning photographs and the inaugural Video Category winner.

Webinar Details:

Thu, 12 Nov, 7:30pm – 8:30pm AEDT, via Zoom Online

Registration is free. Register here

Draft NSW coastal management manual: Have your say

The Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water is seeking feedback on the draft NSW coastal management manual.

Consultation period: 12th October 2026 - 30th October 2026

What’s this about?

The NSW Government is seeking feedback on a draft NSW coastal management manual. The current manual was published in 2018 and provides the requirements and guidance used to prepare, certify, implement and review coastal management programs across New South Wales. The draft manual responds to recommendations from the NSW Audit Office's Coastal management performance audit (2025) and feedback from councils, public authorities and coastal practitioners.

The proposed changes aim to:

  • make the manual easier to use
  • provide clearer requirements and practical guidance
  • improve the processes for preparing and certifying coastal management programs. 

The draft manual does not amend the Coastal Management Act 2016 or fundamentally change the statutory process for preparing and certifying coastal management programs. Existing certified programs will remain valid.

Following consultation, we will review the feedback and use it to finalise the draft manual. The updated manual will then be considered by the Minister for the Environment. If approved, once published in the NSW Government Gazette, the updated manual will replace the current manual and commence in late 2026.

NSW coastal management manual

Date: 12 Oct 2026 - PDF 22.29 MB / Pages 90 download here

Mandatory requirements and guidance for a coastal management program

The draft manual sets out mandatory requirements and supporting guidance for preparing, adopting, implementing, reviewing and amending coastal management programs under the Coastal Management Act 2016.

Draft Document cover: for ID when downloading

Proposed changes to the NSW coastal management manual consultation summary (PDF 1.59 MB / Pages 10)

This document summarises the main proposed changes and explains how they respond to recommendations from the NSW Audit Office and feedback from councils, government agencies and coastal practitioners. 

The proposed changes aim to make the manual easier to use, provide clearer requirements and practical guidance, and improve the processes for preparing and certifying coastal management programs. The draft manual also supports a more proportionate and risk-based approach to coastal management planning, stronger implementation and review, and improved recognition of Aboriginal cultural values, knowledge and participation.

We are particularly interested in whether the draft manual:

  • clearly identifies mandatory requirements
  • provides practical guidance
  • improves coastal management program preparation and certification
  • supports a proportionate and risk-based approach
  • provides clearer expectations for implementation and review
  • is easier to navigate and use than the current manual
  • allows for a simple transition for existing and in-train CMPs
  • could create any unintended practical consequences.

We invite councils, coastal practitioners, government agencies, community organisations and interested members of the public to review the draft manual and provide feedback. Your feedback will help inform the final manual before it is considered by the Minister for the Environment.

Draft Document cover: for ID when downloading

Have your say

Have your say by 11:59 pm Friday 30 October 2026.

There is one way to submit your feedback. - Online

Draft coastal management manual online feedback form

Complete this short survey to provide feedback on the draft coastal management manual and help identify any improvements needed before it is finalised.

Contact us

Marine, Coast, Estuary and Flood team - Email: coastandestuary@dcceew.nsw.gov.au

Draft Koala Conservation Strategy: Have Your Say

The Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water is seeking feedback on the Draft Koala Conservation Strategy.

Consultation period: 12th October 2026 - 9th November 2026

The Draft Koala Conservation Strategy:

  • identifies key koala populations
  • outlines a toolbox of conservation actions that can be applied to address key threats to koalas.

What is changing?

The draft strategy adopts a landscape-scale approach to koala conservation. This approach recognises that, to protect koalas, we must protect and restore the ecosystems they depend on.

The strategy will be delivered through the Saving our Species framework, ensuring koala conservation is integrated with other threatened species conservation efforts across the state.

The strategy will be delivered through the Saving our Species framework, integrating koala conservation with other threatened species conservation efforts across NSW.

Your feedback will help shape the final strategy to ensure it is practical, effective and informed by local knowledge.

A separate Implementation Plan will translate the strategy’s priorities into targeted, on-ground actions, providing a roadmap for coordinated delivery by government agencies, conservation partners and local communities.

We are interested in what level of detail you think should be in the Implementation Plan.

Download the strategy: The koala: draft Saving our Species conservation strategy (PDF 2.47 MB)

Have your say

Have your say by 9am on Monday 9 November 2026.

There are 2 ways to submit your feedback.

Online - use the form here

Email - to koala.strategy@environment.nsw.gov.au

Draft Document cover: for ID when downloading

Namoi long-term water plan review: Have Your Say

The Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water is seeking feedback on the draft second edition of the Namoi long-term water plan.

Consultation period: 9th October 2026 - 30th October 2026

What’s this about?

The Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water is reviewing and updating the Namoi long-term water plan. We are seeking feedback from communities, stakeholders and Aboriginal peoples.

Long-term water plans guide how environmental water is managed across 9 NSW Murray-Darling Basin catchments. 

The plans set:

  • long-term objectives
  • targets
  • water requirements.

These support the health of:

  • rivers
  • wetlands
  • floodplains
  • and the ecosystems and communities that depend on them.

The Murray-Darling Basin Plan requires these plans to be reviewed every 5 years.

Reviewing the Namoi long-term water plan ensures it reflects the latest scientific, climate and environmental knowledge, as well as stakeholder feedback.

The review includes stronger engagement with Aboriginal communities and consideration of Aboriginal knowledge, values and objectives.

The department will consider all submissions received during consultation. Your feedback will:

  • help inform the final plan
  • guide the management of environmental water in the Namoi catchment over the next 20 years.

Namoi Long-Term Water Plan Documents Review: The draft plan

The proposed second edition of the Namoi LTWP includes:

  • updated information and analysis
  • refined objectives and targets
  • improved understanding of climate change risks
  • updates to low-flow environmental water requirements
  • strengthened recognition of Aboriginal values, knowledge and aspirations.

See a summary of the proposed changes to the plan.

To guide your input, download Part A and Part B of the Draft Namoi long-term water plan (second edition) here:

Draft Document covers: for ID when downloading

Summary of the proposed changes to the plan.

Background

As part of a 5-year review, the 9 long-term water plans (LTWPs) for NSW inland catchments within the Murray-Darling Basin are being updated to reflect the latest policy, science and stakeholder input. This second edition also responds to the 2025 update of the Murray-Darling Basin Authority’s (MDBA) Basin-wide environmental watering strategy (BWS).  

Key changes and improvements to LTWPs include: 

  • strengthened First Nations engagement and content
  • refined ecological objectives and targets
  • refined environmental water requirements (EWRs) for low flows and new or modified EWRs in some areas
  • enhanced consideration of climate change 
  • strengthened risk management and investment alignment
  • enhanced socio-economic considerations.

Strengthened First Nations engagement and content

Significant progress has been made in working with Aboriginal Traditional Owners and groups to build relationships and inform how Aboriginal people wish to be represented in updated LTWPs. Targeted engagement has identified additional cultural values, objectives and outcomes requiring careful integration into plan content.

Building on the 2025 BWS, this remains a priority for NSW to ensure LTWPs appropriately reflect cultural water values and support enduring relationships and outcomes for Aboriginal people.

Refined ecological objectives and targets

Ecological objectives and targets have been refined to improve alignment with monitoring and evaluation frameworks, enhance measurability, and support clearer tracking of environmental outcomes. 

Updated environmental water requirements

Second edition LTWPs include refined cease‑to‑flow, very low flows and baseflow EWRs to improve clarity and support assessment. These changes provide clearer definition of frequency, duration and maximum inter-event requirements.

For cease-to-flow EWRs, duration and frequency requirements have been updated at all locations based on improved analysis of cease-to-flow events in historical and modelled flow records. 

In the Namoi LTWP, additional EWR updates include revised bank full and overbank flow thresholds for the Keepit to Boggabri planning unit (Namoi River at Gunnedah gauge). At this location, bank full and overbank EWR flow rates have been reduced to better reflect river channel characteristics and observed flow and inundation patterns. 

A new guidance section for using EWRs is also included in the updated LTWP.

Enhanced climate change considerations

Climate change has been a key focus of the review, with sections strengthened through:

  • updated projections for changes to temperature, rainfall and streamflow
  • improved analysis to illustrate the sensitivity of selected EWRs to a range of water availability scenarios under climate change.

These updates enable a more robust and in-depth assessment of future flow scenarios, climate risks and potential management responses, strengthening the overall evidence base.

Strengthened risk management and investment alignment

Risks and constraints to LTWP objectives and EWRs, and their associated mitigation strategies, have been updated and are supported by revised investment opportunities. These revisions will strengthen implementation by providing better clarity on priority actions, potential partner agency roles, and opportunities to mitigate risks and enhance environmental and cultural outcomes.

Enhanced socio-economic considerations

Socio-economic considerations have been integrated into the LTWPs, in alignment with the 2025 BWS. These considerations recognise the contribution of environmental watering to regional communities and economies.

Have your say

Have your say by 30 October 2026. 

You can provide feedback in 2 ways.

Online - Have your Say via feedback form online

Email: wfte@environment.nsw.gov.au

New UNEP report lays out emission cuts needed for return to 1.5°C

Released: October 21, 2026

With global temperature rise set to exceed 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels, urgent and stringent cuts to greenhouse emissions are needed to minimize the magnitude and duration of overshoot and return to 1.5°C by the end of the century, a new UNEP report finds.

The Emissions Gap Report 2026: The Point of Return looks at a ‘lowest possible’ 1.5°C overshoot scenario, in which peak warming by around the middle of the century is limited to 1.7-1.8°C and global temperature rise is returned to or below 1.5°C by 2100, with about a 50 per cent chance.

To get onto this pathway, global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions would have to be reduced by 18 per cent by 2030, 45 per cent by 2035 and 69 per cent by 2040, all relative to 2025 levels. By contrast, the full implementation of Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) would only reduce emissions by 5-8 per cent by 2030 and 11-15 per cent by 2035, relative to 2025 levels. This implies average annual reduction rates of 5.7 per cent for 2025-2035, higher than the old Sixth Assessment Report (AR6) pathways laid out by the IPCC, which required annual reduction rates of about 5 per cent.

"Overshoot is not surrender. We can still keep it as small and as short as possible – and bring temperatures back below 1.5 degrees by the end of the century," UN Secretary-General António Guterres said in a message on the report. "The new Emissions Gap Report from the United Nations Environment Programme shows us what it will take: Cutting global greenhouse gas emissions by 18 per cent by 2030 and 45 per cent by 2035 – compared with 2025 levels."

However, the report finds that there are more opportunities than ever to accelerate action. Since the adoption of the Paris Agreement, renewable energy has boomed, total energy supply from coal and oil has grown slower than projected and climate policies have cut emissions in many places.

“Every additional fraction of a degree and additional year of warming above 1.5°C increases climate impacts and risks, such as the deadly floods, heatwaves and wildfires that have plagued many nations this year,” said Inger Andersen, Executive Director of UNEP. “So, we must pull out all the stops to minimise peak warming and return to 1.5°C by the end of the century. This is possible.

“We have a wealth of success stories showing that emissions can be cut quickly. It is now up to nations to urgently put in place policies that spark fast, deep and sustained emissions reductions, and put the world on track for a more stable climate and more stable economies and societies.”

Temperature projections still far too high

The report finds that if current policies continue, warming could reach 2.8°C within this century and increase thereafter. If all NDCs are delivered and similar efforts continue, warming will be limited to 2.6°C. These outcomes are worse than last year’s projections due to the withdrawal of the United States of America from the Paris Agreement and revised estimates of historical emissions. New NDCs submitted since last year’s report have made a negligible difference for these projections.

Even in the most optimistic scenario, where all NDCs plus additional net-zero targets are achieved, global warming would only be limited to 2.1°C in this century. Without urgent action, keeping peak warming below 1.7 to 1.8°C will quickly become impossible. Every five years of CO2 emissions at current levels pushes peak warming up by around 0.1°C.

In addition, the lowest possible 1.5°C overshoot scenario creates a need for the removal from the atmosphere and permanent storage of roughly 320 gigatonnes of CO2 (equivalent to around eight years of 2024’s global CO2 emissions) over the course of this century. However, socioeconomic and technological challenges make the chances of achieving this uncertain.

Successful climate efforts need to be scaled up

Returning to or below 1.5°C can be done, particularly since there is growing evidence that climate policies across the world can and have reduced emissions. The report links the introduction or strengthening of climate-related policies to dozens of structural shifts in developed and developing countries, resulting in significant emissions reductions.

More than 220 policy evaluations provide further evidence of what works. Evaluated policies in the electricity sector reduced emissions by an average of 9 per cent, while economic instruments, including carbon cap-and-trade schemes and carbon taxes, achieved reductions of 5-13 per cent across sectors in the evaluation period considered. Yet these successes remain concentrated in specific sectors, countries and periods. Getting onto a lowest possible 1.5°C overshoot pathway requires replicating, extending, and sustaining these successes.

Accelerating implementation of Global Stocktake goals

In the first Global Stocktake (GST), nations agreed to triple renewable energy capacity and double the annual rate of energy efficiency improvements by 2030, transition away from fossil fuels in energy systems, reduce non-CO2 emissions, halt and reverse deforestation and forest degradation, and more.

However, recent rates of change across all indicators tracking absolute GHG emissions – including CO2 emissions in energy systems, road transport emissions, and non-CO2 emissions, notably methane emissions – are heading in the wrong direction. While current policy scenarios project that some of these emissions will stabilize by 2030, none show declines occurring at the pace and scale needed to minimize the magnitude and duration of overshoot of 1.5°C.

The second GST can build on the first by reaffirming priority mitigation action areas, extending quantified goals to 2035 and 2040, and making existing action areas more tangible through clearer and, where possible, quantified targets. The report provides a preliminary assessment of such extensions to 2035 and 2040, consistent with the lowest 1.5°C overshoot scenario.

For the goal to triple global renewable energy capacity and double the annual rate of energy efficiency improvement, an extension to 2035 would imply at least tripling renewable electricity capacity and reducing primary energy intensity of GDP by at least 30 per cent relative to 2025 levels. For 2040, these estimates increase to at least 4.5 times and at least 40 per cent respectively.

The good news is that since the adoption of the Paris Agreement, global renewable electricity capacity has grown three times faster than anticipated, with solar PV build-out increasing seven times faster. A continuation of these trends, supported by additional policies, would bring the world on track to triple renewable energy capacity by 2030 and increase the share of wind and solar in electricity generation to levels consistent with the lowest possible 1.5°C overshoot scenario. 

Extending the goal related to transitioning away from fossil fuels in energy systems would require globally reducing the share of coal, oil and gas in total energy supply by at least 55, 15 and 5 per cent by 2035 relative to 2025. Reductions of at least 75, 30 and 35 per cent would be required in 2040.

At the same time, electricity generation from coal would need to fall by at least 75 per cent in 2035 relative to 2025 and be effectively phased out globally by 2040. Methane emissions would need to be at least 25 per cent lower than 2025 levels by 2035 and at least 40 per cent lower by 2040.

United Nations Environment Programme (2026). Emissions Gap Report 2026: The point of return – Urgent emissions cuts needed to come back from overshoot of 1.5°C. Olhoff, A. (chief ed.), Lamb, W., Kuramochi, T., Rogelj, J., Pelz, S., Khanna, T., Boehm, S., den Elzen, M., Jeffery, L., Minx, J., Muûls, M., Pachauri, S., Pathak, M., Riahi, K. and Sudharmma Vishwanathan, S. (eds). Nairobi

Download here (PDF 6.48MB)

About the UN Environment Programme (UNEP)

UNEP is the leading global voice on the environment. It provides leadership and encourages partnership in caring for the environment by inspiring, informing and enabling nations and peoples to improve their quality of life without compromising that of future generations.

CCWA calls for answers on massive methane leak detected above Chevron's Barrow Island facility

October 20 2026

The Conservation Council of WA (CCWA) is calling on Chevron and the state government to come clean about a massive methane leak detected above its Barrow Island facility.

According to a Data Desk report published on 15 October, “massive clouds of methane have been observed at Chevron’s Gorgon liquefied natural gas (LNG) plant in Australia on five consecutive satellite overpasses dating back to November (2025)”. 

Report authors Aaron Clark and Naish Gawen said, “the most recent public observation was made on August 29 by Carbon Mapper’s Tanager-1 satellite and triggered an alert from the United Nations, which issues notifications to operators and governments on the world’s most urgent methane emissions in a bid to stop them”.   

CCWA Executive Director Matt Roberts said it was alarming that it remains unclear if the leakage has been stopped. He called on the State Government to take urgent action to seek answers from Chevron. 

“It’s unacceptable for Chevron, which is profiteering to the tune of billions of dollars from war in the Middle East, to be carelessly spewing out methane pollution from its Western Australian facilities,” Mr Roberts said. 

“Methane gas is an extra potent fossil fuel, and Chevron’s leak is adding fuel to the climate crisis, which is already costing lives around the world. 

"With hundreds of international delegates in Perth for the Global Citizen NOW summit talking about renewable energy, this is yet another example of how the State Government has failed to deal with the main source of WA's emissions problems, the gas industry. 

"A large number of delegates have spoken about the need to end further extraction of fossil fuels in order to make the transition to a renewable energy future and meet emissions reductions consistent with 1.5c alignment. 

"Gas is a dirty fossil fuel playing a key role in driving the current climate crisis. 

“WA's emissions have risen 19% since 2005 and continue to climb - we remain the only state without an interim emissions reduction target. In the meantime, we’ve got Chevron proving once again that it’s unable, or unwilling, to meet emissions obligations." 

In April this year, the National Offshore Petroleum Safety and Environmental Management Authority (NOPSEMA) approved further development of the Gorgon project.  

“The installation of new wells and pipelines will maintain production rates of about 15.6 million tonnes of LNG a year, equating to 468 million tonnes of gas over the next three decades, handing Chevron a $300 billion windfall without paying a cent in royalties. Enough is enough.” 

A cloud of the potent methane gas observed at the Gorgon LNG plant in Australia. Source: Carbon Mapper

The ABC reported this week the repeated detections, the latest far exceeding a "super emitter" event under US EPA guidelines, prompted a United Nations (UN) warning to Chevron.

According to the UN, methane is responsible for about 25 per cent of global warming and is a greenhouse gas 80 times more harmful than carbon dioxide.

Chevron confirmed it had received the alert and was working with the UN Environmental Programme (UNEP) to address it.

However, a UNEP spokesperson told the ABC it had not received formal feedback from Chevron or the Australian government, and would update its publicly available data when it had.

Further background on Chevron gas leaks: 

In July 2025, it was identified that an unknown amount of gas was seeping to the surface on Barrow Island, where the company ceased oil production two months earlier.

At the time, Chevron said it had informed the Department of Mines, Petroleum and Exploration (DMPE) of the problem and was working with them to investigate the leak from the Gearle Formation, beneath the surface of the island. 

“There have been ongoing compliance issues associated with Chevron’s Gorgon LNG project at Barrow Island, and further reports of gas releases indicate the process is continuing to fail,” Mr Roberts said.  

ACCC releases guidance on business emissions claims to consumers

Received Tuesday October 20, 2026

Australian businesses making greenhouse gas emissions claims should use credible, science-based accounting standards, be transparent about the use of purchased credits, and, above all else, consider what average consumers would understand their claims to mean.

These recommendations are contained in new ACCC guidance to assist businesses in making accurate and credible emissions claims, titled Making emissions claims to consumers – a guide for business.

Businesses that want to promote their efforts to address climate change are encouraged to use the guidance to understand potentially problematic behaviour and risks in failing to consider the consumer perspective when advertising emissions data.

False or misleading environmental claims risk breaching the Australian Consumer Law.

“Consumers should be able to trust the emissions-related claims that businesses make,” ACCC Deputy Chair Mick Keogh said.

“Greenwashing not only limits the ability of consumers to make informed purchasing decisions, but it also disadvantages businesses that have invested in the development of products or services that are genuinely more environmentally sustainable.”

“We recognise that greenhouse gas emissions accounting is complex and increasingly regulated. Our guidance is particularly aimed at helping businesses to understand their consumer law obligations when making voluntary marketing claims to consumers,” Mr Keogh said.

“We strongly encourage businesses to review their consumer facing emissions claims in light of our guidance. If any existing claims raise concerns, businesses should update their messaging, gather stronger evidence, or reconsider using it.”

The guidance emphasises the need for transparency, so consumers truly understand what emissions changes are occurring, and can distinguish direct emissions reductions from credits bought from projects that happen elsewhere.

The ACCC also urges businesses to:

  • Ensure that emissions claims are based on complete, reputable and clear accounting.
  • Avoid highly selective, broad or non-specific claims.
  • Avoid “double counting” changes to emissions.
  • Be clear in any marketing claims about individual business efforts, broader changes available to all, and legal obligations; and,
  • Only make claims about the future where they have reasonable grounds to do so.

The guidance recognises the role of carbon credits and other certificates as a complement to direct emissions reductions. However, if marketing gives the impression two activities are equivalent, neutralise or cancel each other out, businesses must have a reasonable basis to make these claims.

Consumer and fair-trading concerns in relation to environmental claims and sustainability, with a focus on greenwashing, is a current ACCC compliance and enforcement priority. 

Since making greenwashing a compliance and enforcement priority in 2023 and releasing its first set of Environmental Claims Guidance, the ACCC has observed significant changes in some of the sustainability claims of large companies across sectors such as aviation, energy, logistics and telecommunications.

The ACCC has observed some companies move away from vague, widely advertised, carbon neutral claims, distant future targets and limited transparency about their reliance on credits, to be more transparent with customers about their actual, real-world environmental impacts. This includes making clear that certain activities are not sustainable and purchasing credits is not the most effective way for consumers to reduce their emissions.

The ACCC will continue to monitor this positive trend, which supports informed consumer decision making, and will consider targeted enforcement action for on-going problematic conduct where it is appropriate.

Background

The ACCC published general guidance on environmental claims in 2023 to address growing concerns of greenwashing in the marketing claims of Australian businesses.

The new emissions claims guidance complements and builds on the 2023 general guidance, applying the same principles and providing examples in the context of emissions-related claims.

Businesses have broad obligations under the Australian Consumer Law not to make false or misleading representations or engage in misleading or deceptive conduct, including in relation to environmental claims.

ASIC also enforces laws that require businesses offering sustainability-related financial products, such as managed funds, to comply with misleading statement prohibitions under the ASIC Act.

The ACCC has taken enforcement against several companies for alleged greenwashing in recent years. This includes:

  • The Federal Court ordering Clorox Australia to pay $8.25m in penalties for misleading “ocean plastic” claims about certain GLAD products.
  • Commencing Federal Court proceedings against Australian Gas Networks over allegations of greenwashing in its renewable gas campaign.
  • Commencing Federal Court proceedings against the maker of Banana Boat and Hawaiian Tropic sunscreens for allegedly engaging in greenwashing when claiming its sunscreens were “reef friendly”.

 

MACH Energy High Court decision

Statement released: 7 October 2026 by NSW Minister for Natural Resources, the Hon. Courtney Houssos MLC

The NSW Government acknowledges the High Court of Australia’s ruling on MACH Energy’s Mount Pleasant coal mine extension and will carefully consider the full judgment.

We want to be very clear with workers and their families, Mount Pleasant has a separate approval to continue operating until 2032. This decision does not change that.

The Court’s decision relates to the way the mine’s expansion was assessed and approved in 2022, under the former government. It does not mean the expansion cannot be reconsidered or that coal mine extensions cannot be approved.

The Minns Labor Government’s NSW Coal Industry 2026–2050 policy provides a clear framework for the industry. It supports important coal mining jobs that sustain so many of our regional communities, while charting a course to net zero.

We have also made significant planning reforms. The recent approval of the Hunter Valley Operations project included detailed consideration of Scope 3 emissions and conditions to minimise them.

We believe the current planning framework is capable of addressing these issues, and we'll carefully examine the judgment to ensure future decisions meet the requirements of the law.

MACH Energy has indicated it will continue to pursue options for the project, and we will engage closely with the company as it does so.

Australia's reputation as a reliable coal exporter matters. That includes meeting the environmental standards and expectations of international markets, many of which have their own commitments to reducing emissions.

Coal has underpinned the state's economic prosperity for generations, powering industry and supporting regional communities. It will continue to play an important role in NSW for decades to come. 

Minns Labor Government steps in to protect 400 Hunter jobs ahead of Christmas

Statement Released: 19 October 2026

The Minns Labor Government will introduce legislation in the next sitting fortnight to protect 400 jobs at MACH Energy’s Mount Pleasant coal mine in the Hunter, providing certainty to workers and their families in the lead-up to Christmas.

As part of the intervention, MACH Energy has agreed to a Jobs Guarantee with the NSW Government to maintain its current permanent workforce until 2032.

The legislation will address the unique legal uncertainty arising from the High Court’s judgment on 7 October 2026.

The NSW Government has been working closely with MACH Energy since the decision, with the company advising that without legislative intervention, it would need to scale back production, putting hundreds of jobs at risk and affecting businesses across the mine's supply chain.

At a time when families are already under pressure, the Government is acting now to prevent hundreds of workers from facing the prospect of losing their livelihoods.

MACH Energy has been scaling up their operations in line with the Independent Planning Commission’s original decision in 2022.

The Government is taking targeted action to protect those jobs while the court process in relation to the IPC's 2022 decision continues.

It is anticipated MACH Energy will continue working through the court process to gain approval to continue its existing operations until 2048.

The Bill addresses the immediate uncertainty by authorising an increased annual production limit of 16.5 million tonnes (MT) until 2032. This is consistent with their current workforce and coal production profile.

The Jobs Guarantee will establish a legal obligation to maintain current staffing levels. Currently 826 permanent workers and contractors are employed at Mt Pleasant.

Importantly, the provisions granting the mine statutory consent will not take effect until MACH Energy has signed the Jobs Guarantee, ensuring the company makes a legally binding commitment to workers before receiving the benefit of the legislation.

The legislation will also place additional conditions on the mine to mimimise its Scope 3 emissions in line with the Independent Planning Commission’s requirements for the Hunter Valley Operations mine and the NSW Coal Industry 2026-50 document.

This legislation responds to the unique circumstances facing Mt Pleasant’s workers. It will not be extended to any other projects.

The Minister for Planning and Public Spaces and Minister for Natural Resources will produce a technical appendix to the NSW Coal Industry 2026-50 policy document to provide additional guidance for the industry and planning authorities on how Scope 3 emissions should be addressed.

A similar action was taken by the Government in 2024 when the Net Zero Act came into effect.

The Minns Labor Government has a record of stepping in to protect regional jobs and the communities that depend on them.

We’ve taken action to protect jobs and the state’s financial interests at Tahmoor Colliery.

We will continue to support the workers and industries regional communities rely on today, while creating new jobs and opportunities for the future.

Premier of New South Wales the Hon. Chris Minns, said:

“At a time when families are doing it tough, the last thing they need is the uncertainty of losing their livelihood just before Christmas.”

“For 400 workers at Mount Pleasant, that’s the uncertainty they’ve been facing, and we’re not prepared to stand by and let that happen.

“Labor has always been the party of working people, and that means standing up for jobs and the communities that depend on them.

“Our commitment to tackling climate change hasn’t changed, but neither has our commitment to protecting working people.

“We have a responsibility to cut emissions and make sure there are good jobs in the years ahead, but we can't turn our backs on the workers and families who rely on these jobs today.”

NSW Minister for Natural Resources, the Hon. Courtney Houssos, said:

“We understand miners, their families and industry want certainty. Our Minns Labor Government is making this one-off intervention to support the 400 workers and guarantee their future.

“Our NSWCoal Industry 2026-50 document now provides a clear framework for the industry to support jobs at existing mines and also address emissions. This issue – and the IPC consent – pre-dates our government, and this framework.

“We have engaged closely with MACH Energy since the High Court decision and thank the Mining and Energy Union and the Mayor of Muswellbrook Jeff Drayton for their advocacy.”

"Coal mines are writing the laws", Minns overrules High Court Climate Decision

Received Monday October 19 2026 from NSW Greens

The Minns Labor Government has announced it will bypass the independent planning process and legislate an increase in coal production at MACH Energy's Mount Pleasant mine, following the landmark High Court decision that found the mine's expansion approval was invalid because the climate pollution from exported coal had not been properly considered.

The Government has capitulated to the company and will allow extraction up to 16.5 million tonnes of coal annually until 2032, four million tonnes more than its existing approval, after MACH Energy threatened that hundreds of workers could lose their jobs before Christmas without Government intervention.

Sue Higginson, former public interest environmental solicitor and Greens Spokesperson for Climate Change and Planning, said: 

“This is an incredible new low for the Minns Labor Government, bypassing the planning process and the law as laid down by the High Court of Australia. One thing is clear, under Labor the coal mining giants are writing the laws, and they are laws that will cause significant unassessed climate pollution and hurt communities,” 

“The community have been working tirelessly to uphold the law and hold this mining giant accountable. Mach Energy have been acting outside the law and mining more coal than they were allowed under their current approval for sometime, and rather than require the corporation to operate under the law, the Premier has capitulated to their threats and taken the side of the billionaire coal company over the community,”

“Minns’ new law is explicitly to allow more coal to be mined and exported, contrary to the High Court’s decision. This is significant over reach by Premier Minns and NSW Labor, writing special laws to protect specific projects sets a dangerous precedent, nobody and no coal company should be above the law of the land and receive such special treatment. It’s threatens our democracy,”

“The multi-national mining corporations, that are now threatening to sack workers before Christmas if they don’t get their way, are the same billionaire corporations that have failed to plan for the transition to net-zero and that have made record profits off the back of the Climate crisis,”

“The NSW Government does have a responsibility to look after the people of NSW, and that should mean looking after workers that are left behind by climate polluting corporations that were only ever interested in their own profits. But, you don’t do this by selling out to the mining giant that is holding the gun,” Ms Higginson said.

Background - previous reports in Environment News October 2026 - Week One

'MACH Energy is misleading the Government - new jobs advertised': Greens

Two days later on October 21, it was revealed claims by MACH Energy, that they would sack 400 workers at the Mount Pleasant Mine unless the Minns Labor Government passes legislation to increase their rate of coal mining, are being questioned after it was revealed that new job advertisements were posted by MACH shortly after the Minns Government announced special laws to allow more coal to be mined.

The announcement by Premier Chris Minns, that special laws would be written for MACH Energy, has caused former Supreme Court Judge Anthony Whealy to call for an independent investigation into the Government decision over public integrity concerns.

Sue Higginson, public interest environmental solicitor and Greens Spokesperson for Climate Change and Planning, said:

“The Government is being fed lies about the job numbers at Mount Pleasant, and they are lapping them up while selling the integrity of the NSW planning and legal systems down the river,”

“MACH Energy’s own documents show that the increased coal mining that will be allowed by Minns’ special laws would only create around 100 jobs, completely undermining their threat to fire 400 workers if they didn’t get their way,”

“This is state capture, a form of modern day corruption in our democracy, where billion dollar corporations are writing laws that benefit them, in defiance of the law as laid down by the High Court of Australia and there is no public oversight of that process. Anthony Whealy is right to call for an independent review of this Government decision and the Greens support this,”

“The Government has decided to step over the independent planning process, they are stepping over the High Court of Australia, and they are trashing the rule of law and supplanting the rule of coal, all while the available evidence suggests that they are being lied to by a massive international mining company,”

Cate Faehrmann, Greens Spokesperson for Mining, Coal and Gas said:

“When wealthy mining companies say jump, Chris Minns says how high. Stuff what the courts say, stuff what our planning laws say and stuff the climate.

“The Premier has clearly been taken for a ride by MACH Energy and this job ad proves it. The company didn’t need special legislation to authorise it to increase coal production. It was doing it anyway.

“The Planning Minister knew for almost a year that MACH Energy was mining more coal than its approval allowed, but he sat back and did nothing.

“Despite the courts ruling that MACH Energy’s approval to mine coal out to 2048 was invalid, it told the world it had approval to do so.''

NSW Planning acting against court ruling and public interest in approving Mt Pleasant coal extension

On October 19 Greens MP and mining spokesperson Cate Faehrmann. said the NSW planning department can no longer be trusted to act in the public interest after it granted a 6-year extension to MACH Energy’s Mt Pleasant coal mine on Friday, despite a recent legal ruling declaring an approval for the mine to operate out to 2048 invalid on climate grounds.

The department’s approval also comes while the High Court of Australia was yet to rule on an appeal from MACH Energy. Cate Faehrmann wrote to the Planning Minister last Tuesday (detailed below) seeking urgent clarification about MACH Energy’s apparent breaches of development consent conditions at Mount Pleasant. 

“For the planning department to give MACH Energy the tick of approval despite the NSW Court of Appeal ruling that its consent out to 2048 is invalid is totally outrageous,” said Ms Faehrmann. 

“Worse, just last week I wrote to the Planning Minister with concerns that MACH Energy appeared to be operating outside its current consent. That is, despite the Court ruling its 2048 consent invalid, it appeared to be operating under that consent anyway.

“This action by the planning department sends a very clear message that mining companies can do whatever they like, even if they have no approval to do so, and the government will tidy things up for them afterwards.”

“The Government has also effectively rewarded MACH Energy for breaching its consent conditions by increasing the extraction limits to accommodate the very over‑extraction they were warned about. Instead of enforcing the law, the Government has changed the law to suit the company.

“This decision raises serious questions about whether the Department of Planning has investigated MACH Energy’s conduct at all and whether any enforcement action has been taken.

“The Minister also needs to explain why MACH Energy was able to get an approval granted while community groups have not even been given a response to the very legitimate concerns raised.

“There are serious questions to answer, including whether MACH Energy had been operating unlawfully and whether planning department officials have chosen to validate those activities,” said Ms Faehrmann.

High Court’s landmark ruling on coal mine is a win, with important limits

A landmark High Court decision has confirmed that decision-makers in New South Wales need to consider downstream emissions – generated when the coal is eventually burned by end users – in assessing fossil fuel projects.

A majority of the High Court has today dismissed an appeal by coal company MACH Energy Australia over the expansion of the Mount Pleasant coal mine in the Hunter Valley. 

The case is highly significant and is the first climate change case to reach Australia’s highest court. It confirmed that decision-makers in New South Wales must consider imposing conditions on fossil fuel projects to minimise to the greatest extent practicable all greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, including scope 3 emissions.

However, this case is not a ‘home run’ for climate action. In fact, the case did not raise any issue concerning climate change other than how to interpret the relevant environmental legislation in the case. It did not consider whether or not the fossil fuel project in question ought to be approved or not in light of climate change concerns. 

The implications of the decision for future climate-related project approvals will therefore depend on how the legal principles identified by the Court are applied in subsequent cases.

The Mount Pleasant mine expansion

The case concerned MACH Energy’s proposal to extend the life of its open-cut Mount Pleasant coal mine to December 2048, as well as a proposal to substantially increase production over the extended life of the mine.

This project has a long history. 

In September 2022, the Commission approved the project expansion. This was unsuccessfully challenged by the Denman Aberdeen Muswellbrook Scone Healthy Environment Group (DAMSHEG), a community environmental organisation, in the NSW Land and Environment Court.

DAMSHEG then, however, appealed the case to the NSW Court of Appeal. In a significant turn of events, DAMSHEG were successful in the Court of Appeal and that court overturned the approval. 

However, MACH Energy appealed the decision to the High Court which led to the decision today.

The High Court decision

In a narrow decision, three of the five High Court judges found that the Commission had failed to discharge its statutory obligations in assessing the proposed coal mine. They therefore refused MACH Energy’s appeal. 

More specifically, the three judges held that the Commission had failed to consider imposing conditions directed at minimising, to the greatest extent practicable, the GHG emissions associated with the project, including its scope 3 emissions. Scope 3 emissions accounted for approximately 98 per cent of the project’s total GHG emissions. 

Scope 3 emissions are indirect GHG emissions occurring downstream in a company or project's value chain. These are usually much larger than the scope 1 and 2 emissions associated with the mine site.

This error means that the case will now have to be returned to the Commission to be re-assessed in accordance with the law. 

Getty Images/CUHRIG

The Court left the bigger climate causation question open

This case has attracted considerable attention because of a broader question: whether GHG emissions from an individual fossil fuel project can be legally connected to climate impacts in a particular locality.

The NSW Court of Appeal had approached the case through this question, finding that the Commission had failed to consider the likely environmental impacts of climate change in the Hunter Valley.

However, four judges on the High Court rejected that aspect of the Court of Appeal's reasoning. They found that it was not for the court to decide whether the project’s contribution to climate change would be disproportionately felt by the Hunter Valley. 

Significantly, two judges explicitly said that climate impacts were not relevant in this case. As they put it, this case "does not raise for consideration any issue concerning climate change outside of the meaning and application of the EPA Act. Nor does it concern any aspect of the merits of the development, which are extraneous to the questions in the appeal".

The case’s implications

The fact that scope 3 emissions must be considered when imposing conditions on a fossil fuel project is highly significant. This confirms jurisprudence, including the ruling of the International Court of Justice, that scope 3 emissions are a crucially important consideration in fossil fuel approvals. 

This will mean that in future cases in NSW, and potentially beyond, decision-makers will need to consider imposing conditions directed at minimising all GHG emissions, not just scope 1 and 2.

However, the judgment does not mean that fossil fuel projects can no longer be approved.

Nor does it establish that scope 3 emissions must always lead to refusal of a project.

Instead, where the law requires GHG emissions to be minimised, downstream emissions cannot simply be put to one side because they occur after the product leaves the project or because they may be emitted outside Australia.

This is progress, but leaves the door wide open for future cases to consider the causal contribution of fossil fuel projects to harm in particular circumstances.

This article was first published on Monash Lens. Read the original article

Coal-producing regions to lead the way under NSW Government’s new Future Jobs and Investment Authority

Announced: Wednesday October 21, 2026

The Minns Government states it has delivered on its election commitment to provide certainty to workers and communities in coal-producing regions by establishing the Future Jobs Investment Authority.

In passing the Future Jobs and Investment Bill 2025 the Minns Labor Government will boost support for the state’s four coal-producing regions – the Hunter, the Illawarra, the Central West and the North West.

This work is backed by $29.7 million of ongoing funding for the Authority and more than $170 million under the new Future Jobs and Investment Fund, with additional contributions each year.

It will place workers, their families and communities at the centre of planning for future economic change.

Coal has played an important role across the state for generations and will continue to do so for decades to come. Around 25,000 people in NSW work directly in the coal mining industry. This includes more than 1,500 at the Hunter Valley Operations project which last month received approval to extend operations into the 2040s under the NSW Government’s Coal Industry 2026-5 0 policy document.

The Authority will be a new capability within government that has the power to: 

  • attract investment to support new industries, skills development and job creation, 
  • facilitate post-mining land use for productive purposes, 
  • lead genuine community engagement through the establishment of four Local Divisions, 
  • report on mine closures to keep communities informed, and 
  • provide workforce support.

It will be set up to ensure that communities most affected by change have a direct voice in shaping their future, through the Local Divisions in each region.

The Local Divisions will include representatives of workers, industry, local government and the community. The Chair of each Local Division will sit on the Board of the Authority, alongside representatives from unions and industry.

The legislation also introduces new requirements for coal mine operators to give workers the time and certainty they need to access new employment opportunities, retraining or retirement. Requirements on operators include providing: 

  • notice of mine closure in specified timeframes and 
  • plans outlining how workers will be supported when mining operations cease.

The passing of this legislation marks a major step forward after more than three years of consultation and engagement with the community in coal-producing regions, unions, industry, local councils and community groups.

The Hunter and Central West Local Divisions will be the first to be established, with the Government to make announcements about appointments in due course.

Minister for the Illawarra and the South Coast Ryan Park said:

“The Illawarra Shoalhaven is one of Australia's great powerhouses. This region has driven the nation for generations and will continue to do so for generations to come.

"The Future Jobs and Investment Authority will place workers and communities at the heart of decision making, ensuring we continue to build a bright future for our region and the State.

“This is about supporting these key industries and their workers, and giving them and their communities the certainty they deserve now and into the future."

Minister for the Hunter Yasmin Catley said:

“The Hunter has never been a region that waits for opportunity to arrive. We build it, mine it, grow it and power it, and this week, we have legislated to protect just that.

"The Future Jobs and Investment Authority will give Hunter families a direct voice in shaping their own future and ensure the next generation has certainty and can continue to access high-quality jobs across the Hunter for generations to come.

"The people of the Hunter have highly-transferrable skills and capability that they have built over generations, and our region is enriched by the thousands of skilled workers who call the Hunter home."

Minster for Planning and Public Spaces Paul Scully said:

“The Minns Labor Government is acting now to plan for the future of our regions.

“The Future Jobs and Investment Authority will help provide a clear pathway for former mining land to support new industries, investment and jobs for decades to come.

"The Minns Labor Government has already started this work with major post-mining land transformations plans at Macquarie Coal Complex and Mt Arthur Mine which could unlock more than 7000 jobs in the future.”

Minister for Natural Resources Courtney Houssos said:

“Today our Minns Labor Government has delivered on an important election commitment. The Future Jobs and Investment Authority will empower workers, communities and industry to create opportunities across mining, manufacturing, rail, energy and infrastructure.

“The passing of this crucial legislation begins a new partnership between government and our coal-producing regions. It means the regions that have powered NSW for generations get the support they need to attract new industries and support job creation in the long term. 

“Around 25,000 people are directly employed by the coal mining industry, and these workers have sustained communities for generations. This is a new capability of government that empowers local communities to plan for their futures as the world moves to low-carbon economies.

“The establishment of the Future Jobs and Investment Authority is the culmination of extensive consultation with industry, workers and communities.

 

Call-Out for Iconic Trees

The council is inviting the community to nominate remarkable public trees for inclusion on the new Iconic Tree Register, with nominations opening 25 September 2026.

The register will recognise significant public trees that contribute to the area’s natural beauty, biodiversity, history and sense of place.

Nominated trees must meet one or more criteria, including visual, ecological, historical,  botanic or social significance.

Most public native and exotic trees are eligible, including those exempt for removal under council or State Government controls if they demonstrate they meet the criteria.

The council stated it will launch the official Iconic Tree Register platform in January 2027, after the first nominations have been assessed. The interactive platform will contain images, locations and informative details of each tree.

A council chosen 'panel with expertise in biodiversity, arboriculture, heritage and landscape architecture will assess nominations against the Iconic Tree Register criteria' the statement out of the council says.

The first intake will allow approximately 30 eligible trees to be recommended for inclusion, with future assessment rounds happening on a regular basis.

Listed trees will be managed under the council’s ''Tree Management Policy'' and monitored for health and condition.

For more information and to nominate, visit the council webpage.

A magnificent Grey Gum (E. punctata) example on the hill heading down Riviera Avenue with a Spotted Gum (Eucalyptus maculata) growing alongside it. Pic: AJG/PON

NSW Snapper Harvest Strategy: Have Your Say

The government is seeking feedback on a draft harvest strategy for NSW Snapper. Share your views on the draft harvest strategy and management framework, which will contribute to the sustainable management of Snapper in NSW.

Public consultation commenced on 1 September 2026 and was initially set to close on 18 October 2026. The consultation period has been extended until 15 February 2027 to ensure opportunity for all stakeholders to provide feedback.

A draft harvest strategy for NSW Snapper has been developed, along with a new stock assessment identifying the stock is at sustainable but low levels.

Documents

The government states on the consultation webpage:

'Harvest strategies are a best-practice way to manage fisheries. They provide a clear plan for balancing environmental, economic, social and Aboriginal cultural interests while helping to keep fish stocks healthy for future generations.

A new integrated stock assessment has estimated the NSW component of the Snapper stock to be approximately 23% of unfished biomass. The assessment indicates the NSW stock has been building from lower levels since the 1990s, so there is some confidence stock biomass will continue increasing under similar catch levels.

The harvest strategy sets clear goals to build the NSW stock to target levels. The first goal is to build the stock to 30% of its unfished biomass. Over time, the aim is to build the stock further to 50% of unfished biomass.

To help achieve this building goal, the harvest strategy sets initial total annual catch (fishing mortality) to 300 tonnes per year, and a defined share to the commercial and recreational sectors. Assessment modelling estimates building to 30% of unfished biomass in 2035 under this level of total catch.

Based on current data, the following management changes would be needed to keep Snapper catches at or below the target level, and within sector shares. These arrangements will be reviewed and updated before commencement and as new information becomes available:'

*Recreational and charter boat limits are not proposed for Snapper.

**Current data indicates a monthly limit of around 950 kg per endorsement holder. Limits will be recalculated before commencement and for each fishing period.

Have your say by filling in a submission form HERE

Consultation will be open from Tuesday 1 September until Monday 15 February 2027.

Your feedback will help to finalise the harvest strategy and management actions to improve the long-term health of the NSW Snapper stock. Please review the harvest strategy and FAQs for further information.

NSW Yellowtail Kingfish Harvest Strategy: Have Your Say

The Government is seeking feedback on a draft harvest strategy for Yellowtail Kingfish in NSW. Share your views on the draft harvest strategy and management framework, which will contribute to the sustainable management of Yellowtail Kingfish in NSW.

Public consultation commenced on 1 September 2026 and was initially set to close on 18 October 2026. The consultation period has been extended until 15 February 2027 to ensure opportunity for all stakeholders to provide feedback.

The government states on the consultation webpage:

'A draft harvest strategy for NSW Yellowtail Kingfish has been developed, along with a new stock assessment identifying the stock as depleted.

Harvest strategies are a best-practice way to manage fisheries. They provide a clear plan for balancing environmental, economic, social and Aboriginal cultural interests while helping to keep fish stocks healthy for future generations.

A new integrated stock assessment has estimated the NSW component of the Yellowtail Kingfish stock to be approximately 5.5% of unfished biomass. The assessment indicates the NSW stock has remained at a relatively consistent but unresponsive level over the past 2 decades.

The harvest strategy sets clear goals to rebuild the NSW stock to healthy levels. The first goal is to rebuild the stock to 30% of its unfished biomass. Over time, the aim is to rebuild the stock further to 50% of unfished biomass.

To help achieve this rebuilding goal, the harvest strategy sets initial total annual catch (fishing mortality) to 120 tonnes per year, which will be shared equally between the recreational and commercial sectors (60 tonnes each). Assessment modelling estimates rebuilding to 20% of unfished biomass in around 9 years, and 30% in around 12 years under this level of total catch.

Recent average total catches are around 250 tonnes per year. Based on current data, the following management changes would be needed to keep Yellowtail Kingfish catches at or below the target level, and within sector shares. These arrangements will be reviewed and updated before commencement and as new information becomes available.

*A recreational catch and release only season may be needed if the bag, possession and boat limits are not sufficient to reduce recreational catch to 60 tonnes for each fishing period. The duration would be assessed based on updated recreational data.

**Current data indicates a monthly limit of around 650 kg per endorsement holder to maintain catch to 60 tonnes for each fishing period. Limits will be recalculated before commencement and for each fishing period.

Lord Howe Island waters are currently excluded from the proposed management changes, recognising Yellowtail Kingfish are likely to comprise a distinct, self-recruiting component of the eastern stock.

Have your say by filling in a submission form HERE.

Consultation will be open from Tuesday 1 September until Monday 15 February 2027.

Your feedback will help to finalise the harvest strategy and management actions to improve the long-term health of the NSW Yellowtail Kingfish stock. Please review the harvest strategy and FAQs for further information.

NSW consulting on Australia's first mandatory solar panel recycling scheme: Have your say

Opened: Monday September 21 2026
Closes: Monday 16 November 2026

The Minns Government is consulting on Australia's first mandatory solar panel recycling scheme to ensure valuable solar panel materials are recovered, reused and recycled rather than sent to landfill.

The proposed regulation will help drive investment and jobs in the solar recycling industry and support the potential development of a solar panel remanufacturing industry in NSW.

NSW leads the nation in solar uptake, with more than 1.18 million rooftop solar systems across homes, businesses, schools and community facilities. As these systems age, increasing numbers of solar panels are ending up in landfill.

Around 14,000 tonnes of solar panel waste is generated in NSW each year. This is predicted to increase to 89,000 tonnes by 2045.

The proposed mandatory product stewardship scheme would require solar panel brand owners to take responsibility for the end-of-life management of their products, helping fund collection, recycling and resource recovery across NSW.

Recycling solar panels is not simply about reducing waste. It is also about capturing valuable resources and creating new economic opportunities.

Valuable materials such as aluminium, glass, silicon, copper and silver can be recovered and reused in new products and manufacturing industries. As larger volumes of materials are recovered, NSW will be better placed to build local supply chains, strengthen manufacturing capability, encourage innovation and create skilled jobs across the state.

To help shape this opportunity, the NSW Government has released an issues paper alongside the draft regulation, seeking feedback on how the state can support the growth of solar panel recycling, remanufacturing and manufacturing industries.

Consultation will seek views from unions, industry, recyclers, manufacturers, researchers, local government, workers and the community on the opportunities, challenges and investment needed to build a circular economy for solar panels in NSW.

Feedback will inform the design of the mandatory product stewardship scheme with the aim of establishing a system that reduces waste, recovers valuable resources and positions NSW as a leader in solar panel recycling and circular manufacturing.

Submissions on the draft regulation and issues paper are now open. For more information and to have your say, visit /yoursay.epa.nsw.gov.au/solar.

Minister for the Environment Penny Sharpe said:

“NSW has embraced rooftop solar, and now we’re making sure those panels don’t become tomorrow’s landfill problem. Solar panels contain valuable materials that can be recovered and put back to work.

“A mandatory product stewardship scheme can help build a circular economy for solar panels, while supporting new recycling and manufacturing opportunities here in NSW.” 

Garigal + Ku-ring Gai National Park: 1080 Operation

NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service will be conducting a baiting program using manufactured baits, fresh baits and Canid Pest Ejectors (CPEs) containing 1080 poison (sodium fluroacetate) for the control of foxes. 

The program is continuous and ongoing between 1 August 2026 and 31 January 2027 in Garigal National Park. Don’t touch baits or ejector devices. Penalties apply for non-compliance. 

Ku-ring Gai Chase Applies from Fri 31 Jul 2026, 10.25pm to Mon 01 Feb 2027, 2.26am. 

NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service will be conducting a baiting program using manufactured baits, fresh baits and Canid Pest Ejectors (CPEs) containing 1080 poison (sodium fluroacetate) for the control of foxes. The program is continuous and ongoing between 1 August 2026 and 31 January 2027 in Ku-ring-gai Chase National Park.

All baiting locations are identifiable by signs.

Domestic pets are not permitted in NSW national parks and reserves. Pets and working dogs may be affected (1080 is lethal to cats and dogs). Pets and working dogs must be restrained or muzzled in the vicinity and must not enter the baiting location. In the event of accidental poisoning seek immediate veterinary assistance.

Fox baiting in these reserves is aimed at reducing their impact on threatened species.

For more information, contact the local park office on:

  • Forestville 9451 3479 (business hours)
  • NPWS after-hours call centre: 1300 056 294 (after hours)

Public comment opens on industrial port and dredging proposal threatening Exmouth Gulf-Ningaloo

  • WA EPA has released Gascoyne Gateway’s environmental review documents for its proposed industrial port in Exmouth Gulf for public scrutiny. 
  • AMCS-Protect Ningaloo is campaigning to stop the port that would attract shipping through a critical humpback whale resting and nursing ground, require extensive dredging and cause other wide-ranging impacts.
  • Exmouth Gulf, Ningaloo will become WA’s newest marine park and is under formal assessment for National Heritage listing – AMCS-Protect Ningaloo maintains that an industrial port would be entirely incompatible with these vital conservation measures.

Australians have 12 weeks to voice their concerns about the industrialisation of Exmouth Gulf after Western Australia’s Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) today released the Environmental Review Document for Gascoyne Gateway’s port proposal for public comment. Submissions close 16 November 2026.

The Australian Marine Conservation Society states the proposal poses such widespread potential impacts to matters of national environmental significance that it has also triggered a federal assessment that will be part of this public comment period.

Gascoyne Gateway wants to build an industrial port 10km south of Exmouth town next to Qualing Pool – a rare freshwater oasis that the WA Government has earmarked as a class A nature reserve. The port would attract large vessels including fuel tankers, cargo ships, cruise liners and other heavy shipping into Exmouth Gulf, which the WA Government has earmarked for a marine park and which is under formal assessment by the Australian Government as a National Heritage treasure. 

This ecologically rich marine and coastal area is closely linked to the World Heritage-listed Ningaloo Coast and holds high conservation value. The area is home to many threatened and listed species, including dugongs, turtles, manta rays, sea snakes and dolphins, as well as corals, seagrass meadows, and sponge gardens. The proposed port would attract massive ships that would pass through a critical resting and nursing ground for one of the world’s largest humpback whale populations, posing serious threats of vessel strike and disturbance. 

Tens of thousands of people have joined AMCS-Protect Ningaloo, the Exmouth-based Cape Conservation Group and many local community members, in opposing the proposal since plans were first announced in 2020.  Over 20,000 emails have been sent to the current and past WA environment ministers calling for them to reject the proposal because it would fundamentally diminish the environmental values of Exmouth Gulf.

AMCS Chief Executive and Protect Ningaloo Director Paul Gamblin said: 

“The Gascoyne Gateway industrial port and dredging proposal is completely incompatible with the environmentally fragile Exmouth Gulf – Ningaloo’s Nursery – and would change this marine wonder forever.  

“An industrial port proposal, jutting nearly a kilometre into Exmouth Gulf and dredging of more than a million cubic metres of the seafloor in one of the world’s most important whale nursing grounds beggars belief.

“Tens of thousands of people have already made clear that industrialisation is unacceptable for Exmouth Gulf. People know that Exmouth Gulf obviously is no place for a port – its future is one of conservation and sustainable, light-touch economic activity, not industrialisation.

“Both the WA and federal governments have signalled that they are committed to protecting Exmouth Gulf so it’s time they made it clear that the future of this natural wonder is economic activity that treads lightly on its fragile environment. They must reject this proposal.

Cape Conservation Group Chair Denise Fitch said: “Exmouth Gulf is where Ningaloo’s whales rest and give birth, where our dugongs and manta rays feed. Dredging a port in the middle of this precious nursery goes against the spirit of stewardship that’s made Ningaloo the conservation and tourism success it has become. 

“Ningaloo is already under pressure from climate change. We’ve recently experienced unprecedented coral bleaching and seagrass damage from marine heatwaves, and further destruction from Cyclone Narelle. Now is not the moment to be adding industrial stressors to this fragile ecosystem. And this is no place for an industrial port. 

“We encourage those who know and love Ningaloo’s nursery to make a submission to the EPA and say no to this unwelcome proposal.”

Protect Ningaloo is calling on Gascoyne Gateway to do the right thing, as two other companies which pursued industrial projects in the Gulf have already done, and withdraw its proposal. 

Overview of Proposed Project

Gascoyne Gateway Ltd proposes to build, own and operate a multipurpose marine complex in Exmouth that will service a variety of vessels including but not limited to cruise liners and associated ecotourism activities, Defence and marine supply vessels. The project will not be utilised for livestock or iron ore.

The Proposal site is located 10 kilometres south of the Exmouth township and immediately south of the Ingram Street light industrial area; opposite the Exmouth landfill site and to the north of the Wilderness Estate residential area.

The proposal has a land-based component (including fuel storage and laydown, supporting marine facilities, desalination plant, renewables precinct, and access and utilities corridor), and a marine component (including marine infrastructure, vessel berths/channels, and anchorages).

An Environmental Review Document (ERD) has been prepared by Gascoyne Gateway Ltd in accordance with Environmental Protection Authority procedures and is released for public review.

The ERD describes the proposal, examines the likely environmental effects and the proposed environmental management procedures associated with the proposed development.

The Proposal includes a land based component (106.54 ha footprint within a 119.02 ha terrestrial development envelope) to support the marine infrastructure (61.63 ha marine footprint within and 79.44 ha marine development envelope) which includes a combination rock groyne and pylon steel construction to a berth-face. The berth face will require 13.5 m of cleared depth (at chart datum, equivalent to depth at LAT) to meet design vessel draughts, achieved by both natural depth and some dredging of sand and seabed limestone at the berth pocket. Marine construction includes piling and dredging, with dredge spoil used in the causeway construction. Three anchorage locations of 1nm diameter each are located in Exmouth Gulf approximately 9.5 km to the north east of the end of the causeway, within a nominal anchorage development envelope of 1153.14 ha. 

The ERD is available for download from Gascoyne Gateway Marine Complex | EPA Western Australia under 3. Assessment > Environmental Review.

The document is also available on the proponent’s website at Gascoyne Gateway Marine Complex.

Submissions should be made here: https://consultation.epa.wa.gov.au/assessment-and-compliance/gascoyne-gateway-marine-complex-per/

Submissions close November 16

Katandra Bushland Sanctuary Season 2026

Dedicated to the Study & Preservation of Native Flora & Fauna of the warriewood, Mona Vale & Ingleside Area

Website: katandrabushlandsanctuary.com/home

Email: katandrainfo@gmail.com

Katandra is open to visitors 10am to 4pm every Sunday from July to October (inclusive). Group visits can be organised at alternative times. Please visit the Katandra Bushland Sanctuary website for more information.

Katandra Bushland Sanctuary is situated in on the face of the Ingleside escarpment, overlooking the Warriewood Valley and the seaside suburb of Pittwater's Mona Vale. Enter Lane Cove road via the traffic lights to access.

PNHA Activities 2026

Our walks for 2026 are listed below. 

You are very welcome to bring friends and older children on these outings. Please book by emailing pnhainfo@gmail.com and include  your PHONE NUMBER so we can contact you in case of changes because of weather etc. 

Looking forward to getting out and about in our lovely area! 

Your PNHA Committee

Pittwater Natural Heritage Association

The Pittwater Natural Heritage Association has been formed to act to protect and preserve the Pittwater areas major and most valuable asset - its natural heritage.

PNHA is an incorporated association seeking broad based community membership and support to enable it to have an effective and authoritative voice speaking out for the preservation of Pittwater's natural heritage.

Our Aims

  • To raise public awareness of the conservation value of the natural heritage of the Pittwater area: its landforms, watercourses, soils and local native vegetation and fauna.
  • To raise public awareness of the threats to the long-term sustainability of Pittwater's natural heritage.
  • To foster individual and community responsibility for caring for this natural heritage.
  • To encourage Pittwater Council and the NSW Government to adopt and implement policies and works which will conserve, sustain and enhance the natural heritage of Pittwater.

Some of our interests and concerns include:

  • Native Tree Canopy
  • "Wildlife Friendly" Gardens
  • Weed Infestation
  • Keeping our Waterways Healthy
  • Beaches and Dunes

Act to Preserve and Protect!

If you would like to join us, please fill out the Membership Form. Visit: https://pnha.org.au

Sunday September 27. Spring in the Bush: Terrey Hills

Meet 9am at corner of Mallawa Rd and Bulara St, Terrey Hills. Walk ends about 11am. With a focus on botany, we’ll see flowering plants in the Proteaceae plant family, waratahs, endangered Grevillea caleyi , and others in the major Australian Proteaceae plant family. You can choose to lengthen this walk which connects to the Perimeter Track. Birds, too.

Sunday October 25: Katandra by Night

Meet 6.45pm at Katandra Bushland Sanctuary on Lane Cove Rd Ingleside. Walk ends about 8.45pm. Sunset is about 7.15. The bush by night is wonderful. We hope to see fireflies again as on previous walks here in October. Bring a torch, or headtorch, preferably with a red light option so as not to dazzle possums. Moderate fitness needed for the bush track and steps. Limit: 15 people, so please book early. 

Sunday November 22: Deep Creek Reserve

Meet 9am in Deep Creek reserve, off Wakehurst Parkway. Walk ends about 11am. Birds and bushland. From the bridge across the creek we may see Dollarbirds, summer breeding migrants that nest in hollows, with their youngsters. Black Bitterns have been observed along the creek margins, so bring binoculars. 

Coming up at Kimbriki

Solar for apartment residents: Co-funding

Less than 2% of apartment buildings in NSW have solar installed, but the NSW Department of Climate Chnage, Energy, the Environment and Water are on a mission to change this.

Their Solar for Apartment Residents grant is co-funding shared solar panel installations on eligible apartment buildings and multi-unit dwellings and has already helped thousands of households.

They’ve extended the program to help more homeowners and renters reduce their energy bills and have also allocated extra funds through a separate Boost grant to help priority communities too.

Application closes: 4 December 2026, 5:00 pm

Share this with your Owners Corporation or Stata Manager and check your building's eligibility at: www.nsw.gov.au/grants-and-funding/solar-for-apartment-residents-soar-grant-program

Birdwood Park Bushcare Group Narrabeen

The council has received an application from residents to volunteer to look after bushland at 199/201 Ocean street North Narrabeen.

The group will meet once a month for 2-3 hours at a time to be decided by the group. Activities will consist of weeding out invasive species and encouraging the regeneration of native plants. Support and supervision will be provided by the council.

If you have questions or are interested in joining the group please email the council on bushcare@northernbeaches.nsw.gov.au

Sydney Wildlife (Sydney Metropolitan Wildlife Services) Needs People for the Rescue Line

We are calling on you to help save the rescue line because the current lack of operators is seriously worrying. Look at these faces! They need you! 

Every week we have around 15 shifts either not filled or with just one operator and the busy season is around the corner. This situation impacts on the operators, MOPs, vets and the animals, because the phone line is constantly busy. Already the baby possum season is ramping up with calls for urgent assistance for these vulnerable little ones.

We have an amazing team, but they can’t answer every call in Spring and Summer if they work on their own.  Please jump in and join us – you would be welcomed with open arms!  We offer lots of training and support and you can work from the office in the Lane Cove National Park or on your home computer.

If you are not able to help do you know someone (a friend or family member perhaps) who might be interested?

Please send us a message and we will get in touch. Please send our wonderful office admin Carolyn an email at  sydneywildliferescueline@gmail.com

622kg of Rubbish Collected from Local Beaches: Adopt your local beach program

Sadly, our beaches are not as pristine as we'd all like to think they are. 

Surfrider Foundation Northern Beaches' Adopt A beach ocean conservation program is highlighting that we need to clean up our act.

Surfrider Foundation Northern Beaches' states:
''The collective action by our amazing local community at their monthly beach clean events across 9 beach locations is assisting Surfrider Foundation NB in the compilation of quantitative data on the volume, type and often source of the marine pollution occurring at each location.

In just 6 sessions, clear indicators are already forming on the waste items and areas to target with dedicated litter prevention strategies.

Plastic pollution is an every body problem and the solution to fixing it lies within every one of us.
Together we can choose to refuse this fate on our Northern beaches and turn the tide on pollution. 
A cleaner coast together !''

Join us - 1st Sunday of the month, Adopt your local for a power beach clean or donate to help support our program here. https://www.surfrider.org.au/donate/

Event locations 
  • Avalon – Des Creagh Reserve (North Avalon Beach Lookout)
  • North Narrabeen – Corner Ocean St & Malcolm St (grass reserve next to North Narrabeen SLSC)
  • Collaroy– 1058 Pittwater Rd (beachfront next to The Beach Club Collaroy)
  • Dee Why Beach –  Corner Howard Ave & The Strand (beachfront grass reserve, opposite Blu Restaurant)
  • Curl Curl – Beachfront at North Curl Curl Surf Club. Shuttle bus also available from Harbord Diggers to transport participants to/from North Curl Curl beach. 
  • Freshwater Beach – Moore Rd Beach Reserve (opposite Pilu Restaurant)
  • Manly Beach – 11 South Steyne (grass reserve opposite Manly Grill)
  • Manly Cove – Beach at West Esplanade (opposite Fratelli Fresh)
  • Little Manly– 55 Stuart St Little Manly (Beachfront Grass Reserve)
… and more to follow!

Surfrider Foundation Northern Beaches

This Tick Season: Freeze it - don't squeeze it

Notice of 1080 Poison Baiting

The NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS) will be conducting a baiting program using manufactured baits, fresh baits and Canid Pest Ejectors (CPE’s/ejectors) containing 1080 poison (sodium fluoroacetate) for the control of foxes. The program is continuous and ongoing for the protection of threatened species.

This notification is for the period to 31 July 2026 at the following locations:

  • Garigal National Park
  • Lane Cove National Park (baits only, no ejectors are used in Lane Cove National Park)
  • Ku-ring-gai Chase National Park
  • Sydney Harbour National Park – North Head (including the Quarantine Station), Dobroyd Head, Chowder Head & Bradleys Head managed by the NPWS
  • The North Head Sanctuary managed by the Sydney Harbour Federation Trust
  • The Australian Institute of Police Management, North Head

DO NOT TOUCH BAITS OR EJECTORS

All baiting locations will be identifiable by signs.

Please be reminded that domestic pets are not permitted on NPWS Estate. Pets and working dogs may be affected (1080 is lethal to cats and dogs). Pets and working dogs must be restrained or muzzled in the vicinity and must not enter the baiting location. Penalties apply for non-compliance.

In the event of accidental poisoning seek immediate veterinary assistance.

For further information please call the local NPWS office on:

NPWS Sydney North (Middle Head) Area office: 9960 6266

NPWS Sydney North (Forestville) Area office: 9451 3479

NPWS North West Sydney (Lane Cove NP) Area office: 8448 0400

NPWS after-hours Duty officer service: 1300 056 294

Sydney Harbour Federation Trust: 8969 2128

Volunteers for Barrenjoey Lighthouse Tours needed

Details:

Johnson Brothers Mitre 10 Recycling Batteries: at Mona Vale + Avalon Beach

Over 18,600 tonnes of batteries are discarded to landfill in Australia each year, even though 95% of a battery can be recycled!

That’s why we are rolling out battery recycling units across our stores! Our battery recycling units accept household, button cell, laptop, and power tool batteries as well as mobile phones! 

How To Dispose Of Your Batteries Safely: 

  1. Collect Your Used Batteries: Gather all used batteries from your home. Our battery recycling units accept batteries from a wide range of products such as household, button cell, laptop, and power tool batteries.
  2. Tape Your Terminals: Tape the terminals of used batteries with clear sticky tape.
  3. Drop Them Off: Come and visit your nearest participating store to recycle your batteries for free (at Johnson Brothers Mitre 10 Mona Vale and Avalon Beach).
  4. Feel Good About Your Impact: By recycling your batteries, you're helping support a healthier planet by keeping hazardous material out of landfills and conserving resources.

Environmental Benefits

  • Reduces hazardous waste in landfill
  • Conserves natural resources by promoting the use of recycled materials
  • Keep toxic materials out of waterways 

Reporting Dogs Offleash - Dog Attacks to Council

If the attack happened outside local council hours, you may call your local police station. Police officers are also authorised officers under the Companion Animals Act 1998. Authorised officers have a wide range of powers to deal with owners of attacking dogs, including seizing dogs that have attacked.

You can report dog attacks, along with dogs offleash where they should not be, to the NBC anonymously and via your own name, to get a response, at: https://help.northernbeaches.nsw.gov.au/s/submit-request?topic=Pets_Animals

If the matter is urgent or dangerous call Council on 1300 434 434 (24 hours a day, 7 days a week).

If you find injured wildlife please contact:
  • Sydney Wildlife Rescue (24/7): 9413 4300 
  • WIRES: 1300 094 737

Plastic Bread Ties For Wheelchairs

The Berry Collective at 1691 Pittwater Rd, Mona Vale collects them for Oz Bread Tags for Wheelchairs, who recycle the plastic.

Berry Collective is the practice on the left side of the road as you head north, a few blocks before Mona Vale shops . They have parking. Enter the foyer and there's a small bin on a table where you drop your bread ties - very easy.

A full list of Aussie bread tags for wheelchairs is available at: HERE 


Stay Safe From Mosquitoes 

NSW Health is reminding people to protect themselves from mosquitoes when they are out and about.

NSW Health states Mosquitoes in NSW can carry viruses such as Japanese encephalitis (JE), Murray Valley encephalitis (MVE), Kunjin, Ross River and Barmah Forest. The viruses may cause serious diseases with symptoms ranging from tiredness, rash, headache and sore and swollen joints to rare but severe symptoms of seizures and loss of consciousness.

A free vaccine to protect against JE infection is available to those at highest risk in NSW and people can check their eligibility at NSW Health.

People are encouraged to take actions to prevent mosquito bites and reduce the risk of acquiring a mosquito-borne virus by:
  • Applying repellent to exposed skin. Use repellents that contain DEET, picaridin, or oil of lemon eucalyptus. Check the label for reapplication times.
  • Re-applying repellent regularly, particularly after swimming. Be sure to apply sunscreen first and then apply repellent.
  • Wearing light, loose-fitting long-sleeve shirts, long pants and covered footwear and socks.
  • Avoiding going outdoors during peak mosquito times, especially at dawn and dusk.
  • Using insecticide sprays, vapour dispensing units and mosquito coils to repel mosquitoes (mosquito coils should only be used outdoors in well-ventilated areas)
  • Covering windows and doors with insect screens and checking there are no gaps.
  • Removing items that may collect water such as old tyres and empty pots from around your home to reduce the places where mosquitoes can breed.
  • Using repellents that are safe for children. Most skin repellents are safe for use on children aged three months and older. Always check the label for instructions. Protecting infants aged less than three months by using an infant carrier draped with mosquito netting, secured along the edges.
  • While camping, use a tent that has fly screens to prevent mosquitoes entering or sleep under a mosquito net.
Remember, Spray Up – Cover Up – Screen Up to protect from mosquito bite. For more information go to NSW Health.

Mountain Bike Incidents On Public Land: Survey

This survey aims to document mountain bike related incidents on public land, available at: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/K88PSNP

Sent in by Pittwater resident Academic for future report- study. 

Report fox sightings

Fox sightings, signs of fox activity, den locations and attacks on native or domestic animals can be reported into FoxScan. FoxScan is a free resource for residents, community groups, local Councils, and other land managers to record and report fox sightings and control activities. 

Our Council's Invasive species Team receives an alert when an entry is made into FoxScan.  The information in FoxScan will assist with planning fox control activities and to notify the community when and where foxes are active.



marine wildlife rescue group on the Central Coast

A new wildlife group was launched on the Central Coast on Saturday, December 10, 2022.

Marine Wildlife Rescue Central Coast (MWRCC) had its official launch at The Entrance Boat Shed at 10am.

The group comprises current and former members of ASTR, ORRCA, Sea Shepherd, Greenpeace, WIRES and Wildlife ARC, as well as vets, academics, and people from all walks of life.

Well known marine wildlife advocate and activist Cathy Gilmore is spearheading the organisation.

“We believe that it is time the Central Coast looked after its own marine wildlife, and not be under the control or directed by groups that aren’t based locally,” Gilmore said.

“We have the local knowledge and are set up to respond and help injured animals more quickly.

“This also means that donations and money fundraised will go directly into helping our local marine creatures, and not get tied up elsewhere in the state.”

The organisation plans to have rehabilitation facilities and rescue kits placed in strategic locations around the region.

MWRCC will also be in touch with Indigenous groups to learn the traditional importance of the local marine environment and its inhabitants.

“We want to work with these groups and share knowledge between us,” Gilmore said.

“This is an opportunity to help save and protect our local marine wildlife, so if you have passion and commitment, then you are more than welcome to join us.”

Marine Wildlife Rescue Central Coast has a Facebook page where you may contact members. Visit: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100076317431064


Watch out - shorebirds about

Pittwater is home to many resident and annually visiting birds. If you watch your step you won't harm any beach-nesting and estuary-nesting birds have started setting up home on our shores.

Did you know that Careel Bay and other spots throughout our area are part of the East Asian-Australasian Flyway Partnership (EAAFP)?

This flyway, and all of the stopping points along its way, are vital to ensure the survival of these Spring and Summer visitors. This is where they rest and feed on their journeys.  For example, did you know that the bar-tailed godwit flies for 239 hours for 8,108 miles from Alaska to Australia?

Not only that, Shorebirds such as endangered oystercatchers and little terns lay their eggs in shallow scraped-out nests in the sand, NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS) Threatened Species officer Ms Katherine Howard has said.
Even our regular residents such as seagulls are currently nesting to bear young.

What can you do to help them?
Known nest sites may be indicated by fencing or signs. The whole community can help protect shorebirds by keeping out of nesting areas marked by signs or fences and only taking your dog to designated dog offleash area. 

Just remember WE are visitors to these areas. These birds LIVE there. This is their home.

Four simple steps to help keep beach-nesting birds safe:
1. Look out for bird nesting signs or fenced-off nesting areas on the beach, stay well clear of these areas and give the parent birds plenty of space.
2. Walk your dogs in designated dog-friendly areas only and always keep them on a leash over summer.
3. Stay out of nesting areas and follow all local rules.
4. Chicks are mobile and don't necessarily stay within fenced nesting areas. When you're near a nesting area, stick to the wet sand to avoid accidentally stepping on a chick.


Possums In Your Roof?: do the right thing

Possums in your roof? Please do the right thing 
On the weekend, one of our volunteers noticed a driver pull up, get out of their vehicle, open the boot, remove a trap and attempt to dump a possum on a bush track. Fortunately, our member intervened and saved the beautiful female brushtail and the baby in her pouch from certain death. 

It is illegal to relocate a trapped possum more than 150 metres from the point of capture and substantial penalties apply.  Urbanised possums are highly territorial and do not fare well in unfamiliar bushland. In fact, they may starve to death or be taken by predators.

While Sydney Wildlife Rescue does not provide a service to remove possums from your roof, we do offer this advice:

✅ Call us on (02) 9413 4300 and we will refer you to a reliable and trusted licenced contractor in the Sydney metropolitan area. For a small fee they will remove the possum, seal the entry to your roof and provide a suitable home for the possum - a box for a brushtail or drey for a ringtail.
✅ Do-it-yourself by following this advice from the Department of Planning and Environment: 

❌ Do not under any circumstances relocate a possum more than 150 metres from the capture site.
Thank you for caring and doing the right thing.



Sydney Wildlife photos

Aviaries + Possum Release Sites Needed

Pittwater Online News has interviewed Lynette Millett OAM (WIRES Northern Beaches Branch) needs more bird cages of all sizes for keeping the current huge amount of baby wildlife in care safe or 'homed' while they are healed/allowed to grow bigger to the point where they may be released back into their own home. 

If you have an aviary or large bird cage you are getting rid of or don't need anymore, please email via the link provided above. There is also a pressing need for release sites for brushtail possums - a species that is very territorial and where release into a site already lived in by one possum can result in serious problems and injury. 

If you have a decent backyard and can help out, Lyn and husband Dave can supply you with a simple drey for a nest and food for their first weeks of adjustment.

Mona Vale Dunes bushcare group: 2026 Dates

What’s Happening? Mona Vale Dunes Bushcare group catch-up. 

In 2026 our usual work mornings will be the second Saturday and third Thursday of each month. You can come to either or both. 

We are maintaining an area south of Golf Avenue. This was cleared of dense lantana, green cestrum and ground Asparagus in 2019-2020. 600 tubestock were planted in June 2021, and natural regeneration is ongoing. 

Photos: The site In November 2019, chainsaws at the ready. In July 2025, look at the difference - coastal dune vegetation instead of dense weeds. But maintenance continues and bushcarers are on the job. Can you join us?

(access to this southern of MV Dunes  - parking near Mona Vale Headland reserve, or walk from Golf Ave.) 

For comparison, see this image of MV dunes in 1969!, taken from atop the home units at the end of Golf Avenue. 

2026 Dates

Bangalley Headland WPA Bushcare 2026

Watch out for PNHA signs telling you about bush regeneration and our local environment. This is one of many coming up.

Bushcare in Pittwater: where + when

For further information or to confirm the meeting details for below groups, please contact Council's Bushcare Officer on 9970 1367 or visit Council's bushcare webpage to find out how you can get involved.

BUSHCARE SCHEDULES 
Where we work                      Which day                              What time 

Avalon     
Angophora Reserve             3rd Sunday                         8:30 - 11:30am 
Avalon Dunes                        1st Sunday                         8:30 - 11:30am 
Avalon Golf Course              2nd Wednesday                 3 - 5:30pm 
Careel Creek                         4th Saturday                      8:30 - 11:30am 
Toongari Reserve                 3rd Saturday                      9 - 12noon (8 - 11am in summer) 
Bangalley Headland            2nd Sunday                         9 to 12noon 
Catalpa Reserve              4th Sunday of the month        8.30 – 11.30
Palmgrove Park              1st Saturday of the month        9.00 – 12 

Bayview     
Winnererremy Bay                 4th Sunday                        9 to 12noon 

Bilgola     
North Bilgola Beach              3rd Monday                        9 - 12noon 
Algona Reserve                     1st Saturday                       9 - 12noon 
Plateau Park                          1st Friday                            8:30 - 11:30am 

Church Point     
Browns Bay Reserve             1st Tuesday                        9 - 12noon 
McCarrs Creek Reserve       Contact Bushcare Officer     To be confirmed 

Clareville     
Old Wharf Reserve                 3rd Saturday                      8 - 11am 

Elanora     
Kundibah Reserve                   4th Sunday                       8:30 - 11:30am 

Mona Vale     
Mona Vale Beach Basin          1st Saturday                    8 - 11am 
Mona Vale Dunes                     2nd Saturday +3rd Thursday     8:30 - 11:30am 

Newport     
Bungan Beach                          4th Sunday                      9 - 12noon 
Crescent Reserve                    3rd Sunday                      9 - 12noon 
North Newport Beach              4th Saturday                    8:30 - 11:30am 
Porter Reserve                          2nd Saturday                  8 - 11am 

North Narrabeen     
Irrawong Reserve                     2nd Saturday                   2 - 5pm 

Palm Beach     
North Palm Beach Dunes      3rd Saturday                    9 - 12noon 

Scotland Island     
Catherine Park                          2nd Sunday                     10 - 12:30pm 
Elizabeth Park                           1st Saturday                      9 - 12noon 
Pathilda Reserve                      3rd Saturday                      9 - 12noon 

Warriewood     
Warriewood Wetlands             1st Sunday                         8:30 - 11:30am 

Whale Beach     
Norma Park                               1st Friday                            9 - 12noon 

Western Foreshores     
Coopers Point, Elvina Bay      2nd Sunday                        10 - 1pm 
Rocky Point, Elvina Bay           1st Monday                          9 - 12noon

Friends Of Narrabeen Lagoon Catchment Activities

Bush Regeneration - Narrabeen Lagoon Catchment  
This is a wonderful way to become connected to nature and contribute to the health of the environment.  Over the weeks and months you can see positive changes as you give native species a better chance to thrive.  Wildlife appreciate the improvement in their habitat.

Belrose area - Thursday mornings 
Belrose area - Weekend mornings by arrangement
Contact: Phone or text Conny Harris on 0432 643 295

Wheeler Creek - Wednesday mornings 9-11am
Contact: Phone or text Judith Bennett on 0402 974 105
Or email: Friends of Narrabeen Lagoon Catchment : email@narrabeenlagoon.org.au

Gardens and Environment Groups and Organisations in Pittwater


Ringtail Posses 2023

Long-range forecast: First look – November to January

The Bureau's long-range forecast video provides a look at likely rainfall, streamflow, and temperature for the months ahead.

Our long-range forecast for November to January currently shows above-average rainfall likely for areas of western and central Australia and parts of the east.

Below-average rainfall is likely in parts of the south-east and parts of the far north.

Temperatures are very likely to be above average for most of the country, and El Niño continues to strengthen.

September temperatures were above average across most of the country, except in the far north.

Each state and territory recorded temperatures that ranked among their top ten warmest Septembers on record.

Rainfall during September was above average for parts of the north and much of the west.

In contrast, September rainfall was below average in the south-west and in much of the eastern half of the country.

Some areas had their driest September on record.

Root zone soil moisture as of 13 October is above average across much of the southern and central interior.

Soil moisture is below average in parts of western and eastern Australia, including Tasmania.

Looking ahead, November to January rainfall is likely to be above average for areas of western and central Australia and parts of the east.

Below-average rainfall is likely in parts of the south-east and parts of the far north for November to January.

For October to December, low streamflow is likely at around 84% of sites across Australia.

High streamflow is likely at 3% of sites, and near-median flow at 8% of sites, scattered across the country.

Most of the country has an increased chance of unusually warm daytime temperatures for November to January.

Chances of unusually warm days are highest across southern and far northern parts of Australia.

There's a very high chance of unusually warm night-time temperatures across most of Australia for November to January.

Surface temperatures across the Australian region are forecast to warm during November to January.

This raises the risk of marine heatwaves, especially across parts of the west and in the south. El Niño continues to strengthen and is expected to peak in November or December.

A positive Indian Ocean Dipole is likely to develop during Spring.

We update our long-range forecast regularly. Select your location to find out more. Visit www.bom.gov.au/climate/

We must prepare entire cities for extreme heat. Our new study reveals how

Nicky Morrison, Western Sydney University; Patrick Harris, UNSW , and Vanita Yadav, Western Sydney University

In Australia, the days are growing longer and summer is fast approaching. But a very strong El Niño – a natural weather phenomenon that drives variations in temperature and winds across the Pacific – could make this summer a sweltering one.

This raises the question: are we ready for extreme heat?

Our new research examined how Australia’s Greater Sydney region is preparing for surging temperatures and more frequent heatwaves. In particular, Western Sydney is known for its stifling temperatures, at times being the hottest place on the planet.

We found this city-wide approach involves much more than simply telling people what to do when temperatures soar.

A societal problem

Many Australians know how to cope with hot weather. We drink plenty of water, close blinds and curtains, stay indoors when the sun is at its strongest and regularly check on family, friends and neighbours.

This is good advice. However, not everyone can act on it.

For some people, staying cool is much easier said than done. Not everyone can afford to keep the air conditioner running. Not everyone has a well-insulated home, particularly those living in older homes. Not everyone is well-connected to their neighbours and wider community.

This raises several crucial questions:

  • how can we protect those most vulnerable to extreme heat, including the elderly, pregnant women and people with existing health conditions?

  • how should we design houses, streets and neighbourhoods to reduce heat exposure in the first place?

  • where else can residents go if they need relief from soaring temperatures?

Preparing a city for heat

Our latest research took a closer look at how one city is preparing for extreme heat.

The Greater Sydney Heat Taskforce, established in 2023 and led by the Western Sydney Regional Organisation of Councils and Resilient Sydney, aims to help nearly 5.6 million Sydneysiders cope with rising temperatures.

This taskforce brought together 373 representatives from more than 40 organisations across government, health, emergency services and other sectors. Over an 18-month period, these representatives developed the Greater Sydney Heat Smart City Plan. The plan was launched in December 2024 and is now being implemented.

The plan sets out 40 recommendations for action between 2025 and 2030. These cover topics such as raising awareness about heat-related risks, designing cooler homes and neighbourhoods and protecting vulnerable communities.

The plan also underscores the need for better coordination of services and emergency responses. Unlike floods and bushfires, which trigger specific, established emergency actions, extreme heat has historically fallen between different areas of government.

As researchers working within the taskforce, we examined how the Heat Smart City Plan helped bridge these gaps and identified ways to turn its recommendations into action.

Here are our three main findings.

Coordination is key

To create an effective plan, the Greater Sydney Heat Taskforce had to overcome organisations working in silos. For example, health agencies focus on heat-related illness, while councils manage how public spaces and planning authorities shape the built environment. This means responses to heat risk are often fragmented. By contrast, the Heat Smart City Plan helped organisations build trust, clarify responsibilities and identify gaps in governance.

Communities must be involved

By engaging community groups, including Sweltering Cities and the Western Sydney Community Forum, the taskforce built community experiences into the plan. This boosted support for initiatives like Extreme Heat Awareness Day.

A graphic showing various people living in extreme heat, with the text
A graphic from Sweltering Cities, a national organisation that advocates on issues related to extreme heat. Sweltering Cities

Collaboration alone isn’t enough

Long-term funding, clear responsibilities and ongoing support from local institutions are key to the success of any city-wide heat plan. The Heat Smart City Plan identifies the lead organisation responsible for turning recommendations into action. We found this encouraged organisations to take ownership and incorporate heat preparedness into existing planning, emergency management and climate adaptation frameworks.

The NSW government, for instance, is exploring how urban greening, improved shade and heat-sensitive building design can be incorporated into planning through its draft State Environmental Planning Policy.

More work needed

The Greater Sydney Heat Smart City Plan is a step forward, but the challenge now is turning its ambitions into practical, lasting changes across government and industry.

Promising initiatives already exist. The Australian Red Cross’s TeleRedi program, currently run in South Australia and Western Australia, sees volunteers check in on vulnerable people during dangerous weather.

In Blacktown, libraries and other air-conditioned public facilities offer places to escape the heat, as outlined in the council’s Beat the Heat guidance.

These initiatives are not complicated or new. But making them available where needed requires long-term funding and coordination across housing, infrastructure, health and emergency services. Only then can we protect lives and communities in a warming world.


We’d like to thank Kerry Robinson (Greater Sydney Heat Taskforce Chair), Judith Bruinsma and Kelly Gee (Western Sydney Regional Organisation of Councils, WSROC) and Melinda Dewsnap (Resilient Sydney) for facilitating the taskforce, alongside all its members. We particularly recognise the late Charles Casuscelli, former CEO of WSROC, whose leadership was instrumental in driving this work forward.The Conversation

Nicky Morrison, Professor of Planning and Director of Urban Transformations Research Centre, Western Sydney University; Patrick Harris, Associate professor, UNSW International Centre for Future Health Systems, UNSW , and Vanita Yadav, Senior Research Fellow, Urban Transformations Research Centre, Western Sydney University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

From ‘gentle’ and ‘graceful’ to the ‘cane toad of the sky’: how Australia turned on the common myna

common myna bird on branch against blurred out background
Malik Parwaiz Akhter/Pexels, CC BY-NC-ND
Simon Farley, The University of Melbourne

The common myna is sometimes referred to as “Australia’s most hated bird”. Originally from South and Central Asia, the introduced species from the starling family is abundant, raucous and bold.

Mynas thrive just about everywhere they’ve been introduced, from Taiwan to Mauritius to Florida. In 2000, they made the list of the 100 worst invasive species worldwide compiled by the International Union for Conservation of Nature.

This year, Queensland communities are trying to eradicate these introduced birds. But the same story has been written many times. In 2012, Canberra residents launched their own grassroots efforts to keep myna populations down. In 2004, an ABC article titled “Myna fightback” called for war on the bird.

Mynas – and humans’ efforts to monitor, trap and kill them – make for easy headlines. But there’s a cycle. People notice mynas are in abundance. Community organisations distribute traps. Bounties are offered. Myna numbers appear to decrease. But then people get complacent and the bird bounces back.


Every Australian knows common myna birds are bad, rabbits are worse and feral cats kill native animals unchecked.

But how do we decide what makes an introduced species “good” or “bad” – and will we ever concede that some species are here to stay?

Our new series on invasive species explores these questions.


We don’t know if myna numbers are actually soaring in Queensland, or whether people are simply noticing them more. But my research suggests introduced birds come under more scrutiny at times of anxiety about national identity. Earlier panics over the “immigrant bird” (the red-whiskered bulbul) made it explicit.

It’s too soon to say if similar dynamics are playing out for mynas. But it does raise a question. Is it time to acknowledge mynas are here to stay?

From admiration to loathing

I’m a fifth-generation settler Australian. But the ancestors of the mynas in my suburb were probably here before mine were. They’ve been in Victoria since 1862. In Queensland, they were introduced around Ingham and Townsville in 1883 in the hope they would control locusts and other insects (not unlike the later cane toad).

Attitudes towards mynas have shifted greatly over their 164 year presence in Australia. Though the bird’s ability to eat or damage fruit crops was recognised as early as 1868, its value as an insect eater seemed to balance this out.

Around the turn of the 20th century, birdwatching became a well-organised and popular Australian hobby. The “birdos” of this era often praised the myna.

An anonymous 1886 writer in Sydney’s Globe newspaper described mynas as “dear, gentle, sprightly, and highly amusing”. In 1906, naturalist Charles Barrett described Melbourne’s mynas as “extremely spruce and graceful”.

Even as late as 1971, Alec Chisholm – perhaps Australia’s most revered birdwatcher – wrote in the Sydney Morning Herald:

Obviously, then, this bird from India is now part of the Australian landscape. And it is not, I suggest, an objectionable feature. It does no economic damage, and its assured strutting, combined with its hearty chatter as it forages for insects and scraps in streets and parklands causes it to be regarded as an entertainer

a myna bird feeding its babies who have heads sticking out of a hole in palm tree.
Brought to Australia to eat insects, myna birds were long admired. Aneesh Bhaskaran/Pexels, CC BY-NC-ND

In North Queensland, mynas were accepted much as they were in Melbourne and Sydney. In 1949, an amateur naturalist from the region declared the myna “may be foreign in origin – but he’s Aussie here”.

It was only in the 1970s that public opinion noticeably turned. Hatred for the myna became entrenched in the 1980s and 1990s as part of a broader backlash against what were increasingly called “invasive” species.

The “cheerful” and “dapper” bird was gone. Now it was “bold, arrogant […] and fiercely aggressive”.

Some language bordered on crudely xenophobic. In 1988, a piece in the Canberra Times described a stand of old, native trees as:

housing commission flats for mynahs, with an occasional crimson and eastern rosella occurring in a neighbourhood swamped and dominated and altered by the migrants, a metaphor for the worst fears of those opposed to “Asian” migration

A 1990 piece by the same author described mynas as “invaders” and “foreign bullies”.

Despite the shift in public opinion, it wasn’t until the late 1990s that peer-reviewed research began being published on the effect mynas had on native wildlife.

Researchers found mynas could outcompete native parrots for scarce breeding space. The most high-profile research called mynas “flying cane toads” and the “common thugs of the bird world”.

Here’s the thing. The common myna has certainly expanded its range and numbers over the decades. But the bird hadn’t changed. It looked and behaved the same as it did in the 1860s or the 1940s. What changed was public attitudes, which transformed it from a friendly creature into something malevolent and repulsive.

group of mynas on a roof in australia
Mynas now attract loathing. They’re often caught in traps in an effort to keep numbers down. Tara Malhotra/Getty

Here to stay?

Hatred of mynas is now the norm in Australia. But these birds are likely here to stay, no matter how we feel about them. Where trapping programs are common, mynas live in smaller groups and spend more time hiding. The sense trapping is reducing their numbers might be an illusion. Sometimes, in some places, we might be able to eradicate the common myna – but not everywhere.

Even if we do successfully bring myna numbers down, that will not resolve all our ecological issues. Efforts to reduce their numbers by trapping can create a gap which can be filled by the noisy miner. While this bird is a native honeyeater, it can also drive more vulnerable species away from dwindling habitat. There’s a risk of swapping one “problem” species for another.

As an environmental historian, I worry many people who are passionate about native wildlife are wasting their energy and talents fighting an unwinnable war. But I can also understand the desire to cull mynas.

Humans grow attached to the places we live. We tend not to like it when our places change around us – even when change comes in the form of a bird. Of course, some ecological changes do represent a crisis – but not all. Sometimes, the best response is to sit back, observe and hope for a new equilibrium to emerge.The Conversation

Simon Farley, Lecturer in History, The University of Melbourne

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Feral – and threatened? Endangered camels, banteng and hog deer have found an unexpected refuge in Australia

herd of wild camels in Australian bush.
JohnCarnemolla/Getty
Daniel Ramp, University of Technology Sydney; Erick Lundgren, University of Alberta; Jens-Christian Svenning, Aarhus University, and Martin Schlaepfer, Université de Genève

Millions of large feral animals roam Australia. Pigs, camels, deer, horses, water buffalo, cattle and goats were introduced deliberately as transport, livestock or to hunt. Many have since established wild populations.

Governments spend millions every year trying to keep feral animal numbers down because these animals can have strong effects on ecosystems by eating plants and trampling. In recent decades, populations of these largely herbivorous feral species have grown.


Every Australian knows common myna birds are bad, rabbits are worse and feral cats kill native animals unchecked.

But how do we decide what makes an introduced species “good” or “bad” – and will we ever concede that some species are here to stay?

Our new series on invasive species explores these questions.


Dozens of native species have gone extinct since colonisation and many others are in decline. In response, conservationists have rightly focused on reducing threats to surviving species to stave off further extinctions. Feral animals are thought to contribute to the problem, alongside fragmented habitats, climate change and the end of most First Nations’ fire regimes.

But there’s a paradox here. Some feral animals are abundant in Australia – but threatened, endangered or extinct in the wild in their original regions. For these species, Australia is acting as a last refuge.

How can a feral animal be threatened?

Wild herds of dromedaries (one-humped camels) haven’t roamed the deserts of North Africa and the Middle East for about 2,000 years. The species is now considered extinct in the wild. It survived as a domesticated animal – until Australia imported camels as pack animals for the dry interior.

In the early 20th century, many were left to fend for themselves. Large wild herds of dromedaries once again roam, but this time in Australia’s arid rangelands and deserts.

Other large endangered herbivores roaming Australia include banteng, water buffalo, horses, donkeys, and three species of deer. Many of these have domesticated populations in other countries, but are threatened with extinction in the wild.

Banteng are especially noteworthy. Endemic to Southeast Asia, these wild bovines were brought to Australia’s tropical north to provide meat and milk for an attempted British settlement on the Couburg Peninsula near Darwin. When the settlers withdrew, the banteng were left behind. They thrived.

In modern time, banteng have become critically endangered in their home range due to hunting, habitat loss and disease. One of their most important strongholds is now the Northern Territory.

Of the six deer species introduced to Australia, three are at risk globally. In the 1860s, hog deer were introduced in Victoria as a game species. They, too, are now endangered in their original range in South and Southeast Asia.

Javan rusa deer and sambar deer are considered vulnerable and declining in their native ranges, but both have well-established populations in Australia.

close up of bull and cow from banteng species.
Banteng are a species of wild cattle native to Southeast Asian rainforests. Rudolf Ernst/Getty

A dilemma for conservation

For decades, Australian authorities have treated feral animals as pests to be controlled or eradicated.

These actions are driven by care for Australia’s native species. Free-roaming deer, cattle and camels can compete with native species and livestock for food, as do all large wild herbivores.

In response, large numbers of dromedaries, deer and banteng are shot or poisoned every year.

But is this the right approach, given that Australian populations of these animals may represent an unexpected insurance policy against extinction?

Globally, around 20% of introduced mammal species are threatened in their native range, while roughly 50% of all introduced megafauna (animals weighing over 45 kilograms) are either threatened or extinct where they originally evolved.

hog deer buck hiding in grassland in Australia.
Hog deer are now rare across the Indian subcontinent and other areas – but their numbers are rising in Australia. Martin Auldist/Getty

Should introduced species be conserved?

Debate over introduced species is often polarised. Many conservationists argue they should be controlled because they threaten native wildlife, agriculture and ecosystems.

Others argue conservation should value all species in a world of global reshuffling, particularly when introduced populations may help prevent extinction.

Both arguments have merit. The challenge is to avoid reducing the issue to a simple choice: kill or protect.

European rabbits are endangered in their native range in Western Europe. But Australia’s rabbits can have strong effects on soil and chow through plants, particularly in land cleared for farming. Blanket protection of Australia’s rabbits would have little support. By contrast, there’s a case to be made to protect banteng.

Too often, there’s little space for these difficult questions to be raised and worked through in conservation.

The limits of control

Eradication is no longer the goal for most introduced species. Few see the eradication of all feral rabbits, cats, foxes, camels, deer, goats, horses and pigs from the continent as a possibility.

Management has often shifted, quietly, towards containment, damage reduction or local control. We should be more explicit about this reality.

Eradication makes most sense on islands, inside fenced reserves, or when an introduced population is small, new and causing abrupt changes. Once a species is widespread, long established, hard to remove or globally important, we should give up on eradication.

Instead, we could ask whether introduced species are the drivers of a changing environment – or passengers. For instance, as farms and cities expand, habitat becomes fragmented. Dingoes are often killed to protect livestock.

These changes can make herbivores (feral and native) more abundant by creating edge habitat with novel food sources, while foxes can benefit from fewer dingoes. Conservation authorities might profit from focusing on these drivers, rather than running expensive culling campaigns every year.

What might we discover if we wrestled with these complexities openly and transparently to understand which feral species might have conservation value?

How to think about conserving ferals

In recent research, we examined what conservation of threatened feral populations could look like.

We found conservation priorities wouldn’t change much. The main change would be that some landscapes in Europe, the southwestern United States and central Australia would become more globally valuable as a way to prevent extinction of species, such as fallow deer and the African wild ass.

Moving to recognise banteng and other species as worthy of some protection in Australia wouldn’t overturn existing conservation work. What would change is the story we tell. Rather than thinking of Australia as a land where the richness of nature is dwindling, we could also think of it as an unexpected refuge for species that are threatened elsewhere – and recovering here.

Wild dromedaries no longer roam the deserts of the Middle East and North Africa. Banteng and hog deer are vanishing from the rainforests and plains of their original homes. Australia may be the last place on Earth to see these species wild and free. Don’t we have responsibilities to protect them?The Conversation

Daniel Ramp, Associate Professor and Director, Centre for Compassionate Conservation, University of Technology Sydney; Erick Lundgren, Postdoctoral Fellow in Ecology, University of Alberta; Jens-Christian Svenning, Professor of Ecology, Aarhus University, and Martin Schlaepfer, Senior Lecturer in Conservation Biology, Université de Genève

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Is Australia’s gas reservation scheme really aimed at Santos?

Samantha Hepburn, Deakin University

Australia is one of the world’s major exporters of liquefied natural gas (LNG). Yet, there are mounting concerns about whether gas from the east coast gas market will remain available and affordable for ordinary Australians.

The federal government’s proposed Domestic Gas Reservation Scheme aims to address these concerns. It will require LNG exporters to supply gas to domestic customers, helping ensure households, manufacturers and businesses can access enough energy. The laws were introduced to federal parliament on October 14, and are yet to be finalised.

But the scope of this scheme has sparked vigorous debate. A key question is whether the scheme addresses a market-wide problem or places a disproportionate burden on single companies, notably energy giant Santos. Will the scheme unfairly target Santos – or give it unfair benefits?

The government has drafted the laws with exemptions designed to accommodate existing gas contracts. But does this benefit Santos, specifically through its Gladstone LNG project, over other companies?

The challenge for policymakers is to ensure the scheme recognises genuine differences between gas producers, without threatening domestic supply or inflating gas prices.

Santos in the spotlight

Santos is an Australian oil and gas company with several major projects across the country, including the Barossa LNG and Beetaloo Basin gas fields.

Most recently, its LNG plant near Gladstone, Queensland has been thrust into the spotlight. This plant is also home to two other major LNG export facilities: Queensland Curtis LNG operated by Shell and Australia Pacific LNG, a joint venture of Origin Energy and ConocoPhillips.

While these projects have supplied gas to the domestic market, Santos’ Gladstone LNG project has relied on gas purchased from the east coast market. This domestic gas is vital to meeting its export commitments, including long-term LNG contracts with South Korea and Malaysia.

The proposed reservation laws could place a greater commercial burden on Santos, given how much its Gladstone project relies on domestic gas. However, Santos could also avoid the most taxing obligations through potential exemptions for existing LNG contracts and contract extensions.

In a National Press Club address in September, Santos Managing Director and CEO Kevin Gallagher said the government’s efforts to honour existing contracts and support gas investment are “very welcome”. However, he emphasised the need for “clear, transparent rules” rather than “sweeping ministerial discretion”.

Overall, this suite of issues creates a challenge for regulators and raises important questions about how existing contracts should be treated, how exemptions should be applied and how the scheme will ensure all exporters contribute fairly to domestic supply.

Why existing contracts matter

Companies enter long-term agreements on the assumption they can obtain the gas needed to fulfil their commitments. Abruptly changing the rules could expose exporters to substantial costs and damage Australia’s reputation as a reliable trading partner.

The government has previously indicated contracts entered into on or before December 22 2025 would be protected under the reservation framework.

But should contract extensions, which prolong an existing supply agreement beyond its original expiry date, also be protected?

This question is particularly relevant to Santos’ agreement with major South Korean LNG customer KOGAS, which covers roughly 3.5 million tonnes of LNG annually and includes a potential five-year extension from 2030. Critics argue exempting this extension could allow Santos to keep exporting gas without being subjected to any domestic supply obligations well beyond the original contract terms – and potentially with no benefit for Australian consumers.

The scheme’s laws must therefore make clear whether extensions qualify for protection, under what conditions and for how long.

Paper compliance

The scheme will succeed if it compels gas companies to meaningfully contribute to domestic supply – not just appear compliant on paper.

One concern is some contractual arrangements could allow companies to meet their obligations without actually increasing the total volume of gas available to Australian customers.

For example, an exporter might buy gas from another producer under an existing supply agreement. It can then count that transaction towards its reservation obligations, even though the gas was already available to domestic customers.

The government recognises companies should be free to use standard commercial arrangements, including buying gas from other producers, to meet their obligations.

However, the scheme must distinguish between two types of commercial arrangements. Some arrangements deliver additional gas to the domestic market. Others, however, merely change which company is credited with supplying a certain amount of gas but don’t contribute any physical gas to the Australian market.

Attracting investment

LNG exporters operate within a high-cost industry shaped by long-term contracts, expensive infrastructure and international competition. Poorly designed obligations could increase costs and make contracts more complicated, discouraging companies from investing in new gas projects.

Energy heavyweight Shell has warned the proposed reservation scheme could be a “sledgehammer” to future investment, arguing it is too restrictive or could make gas production unprofitable. These concerns are worth considering, particularly given Australia remains dependent on gas peaking plants.

However, the scheme can’t only focus on securing future investment. This would likely lead to broad exemptions that defeat its original purpose.

Measuring true success

The success of the scheme should ultimately be judged on four key factors:

  • how much extra gas actually reaches Australian customers

  • which exporters receive fewer obligations, and on what grounds

  • whether exemptions simply allow companies to export vast volumes of gas without consequence

  • whether the scheme improves domestic supply without discouraging investment.

When considering exemptions and reductions, regulators should apply consistent criteria and explain their decisions. They should also monitor whether reported compliance actually translates into more gas for Australian buyers. This information should be made public.

It’s unknown if Santos will face a greater burden because its Gladstone LNG project operates differently. But while economic differences should inform the design of the rules, they should not provide an escape route.The Conversation

Samantha Hepburn, Professor of Law, Deakin University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Snowy 2.0 was never going to be cheap. But it will be much cheaper than relying on batteries for storage

Andrew Blakers, Australian National University

The final cost estimate for Snowy 2.0 has been released. The conversion of the original Snowy hydroelectric scheme to a large pumped hydro energy storage scheme will cost A$22-25 billion and will be completed in late 2029.

Much media coverage has focused on the major blowouts in cost and time. When the scheme was announced in 2017, then-Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull gave a rough costing of just $2 billion – extremely low for a project this size – and said it could be finished in four years. Engineering issues, stalled tunnelling machines and surging costs of construction all contributed to the blowouts.

The project has endured a remarkable amount of negative press, including from renewable energy advocates. Some of it is warranted – early cost estimates were overly optimistic. Some is debatable, such as claims it won’t work as advertised.

But let’s zoom out. Snowy 2.0 is about 80% done. It will likely be finished within three years. Once up and running, it will convert the original Snowy scheme into a giant rechargeable battery, able to back up solar and wind overnight and during calm and cloudy weather. It will arrive in time to allow ageing coal plants to retire. Once up and running, it will last 150 years. $22 billion sounds like a lot – but it translates to about $5 per Australian per year of operation.

As more and more renewables enter Australia’s power grids, we will need much more energy storage. Building grid-scale batteries with the same energy storage as Snowy 2.0 would cost three times more than the final cost ($22 billion). But batteries last 20 years, while Snowy 2.0 will last for 150 years.

Why do we need so much energy storage?

Renewables currently provide about 50% of the power in the National Electricity Market, Australia’s largest power grid. The government’s target is 82% by 2030 (mostly solar and wind).

Reaching this goal will require much more storage. That’s because over half the demand for electricity is overnight (defined as 4pm to 8am). During these hours, solar output is minimal or nonexistent. Wind provides some power, but not enough.

Coal plants currently meet most of the overnight demand. But Australia’s coal fleet is ageing rapidly and will not be replaced. Almost all will close over the next ten years.

How can we keep the lights on overnight as coal exits? We can use wind (which is intermittent), gas (expensive and responsible for high emissions), or store energy for use overnight and on cloudy days.

Energy storage has shot to prominence in recent years, driven by rapid falls in battery costs. Home batteries and battery-electric vehicles are surging in popularity for consumers.

In the grid, batteries are muscling in and taking a role once occupied by gas-powered plants to cover short spikes in demand. Because batteries can do this job more cheaply than gas, electricity costs are falling for everyone, not just the owners of batteries.

View of smokestacks and cooling towers at a coal power station.
Nearly all of Australia’s remaining coal power stations will close in the next decade. Tenedos/Getty

So why do we need pumped hydro?

Batteries are an increasingly cheap way to store energy short term, meaning minutes to hours. But they’re an expensive way to cover longer periods, such as overnight and during cloudy days.

This is where pumped hydro can help.

Pumped hydro turns a normal hydroelectric plant into a giant water battery. When power prices are low, water is pumped uphill to a high reservoir. When power prices rise, water is run downhill through turbines to produce power. These schemes excel at long-duration storage, as very large volumes of water can be kept in dams and released as needed.

Every year, Australia’s science agency, CSIRO, releases GenCost, an update on changes to the costs for all components of the clean energy transition.

The latest figures show pumped hydro can store and release power much more cheaply than batteries can. The cost advantage is highest now, but it will still be there in ten and 20 years time. That’s because the steep falls in battery costs are expected to taper off.

Pumped hydro typically lasts five to ten times longer than batteries. Keeping water behind a rocky dam is an extremely cheap and durable way to store energy long term compared to extracting metals to make batteries. Pumped hydro also stimulates the local economy more, compared to imported batteries.

Time to take a longer view

Once up and running, Snowy 2.0 will roughly quadruple Australia’s total rechargeable electricity storage.

Behind the 45-metre high wall of its upper reservoir, Tantangara, is up to 254 gigalitres of water. That’s about 50% of the water in Sydney Harbour (500GL).

This enormous volume of water represents 350 gigawatt-hours of storage – the equivalent of the energy available in the batteries of seven million electric vehicles.

Six white pressure pipes stretch over a hillside, as part of the large renewable energy project Snowy 2.0.
Pressure pipes feed water from the Talbingo Dam to the Snowy Hydro Tumut 3 Power Station. PjHickox/Getty

To stop climate change from worsening, we have to stop burning fossil fuels. To do that, we have to triple or quadruple how much electricity we produce so that we can electrify transport, heating, industry and other sectors.

Almost all of this new electricity will come from solar and wind. We will also need large-scale energy storage so renewable power can be released at night or as needed.

Energy storage is becoming a solved problem. Batteries and pumped hydro can do the job of storing power over shorter and longer periods.

As electrification gathers pace, Australia will need more pumped hydro projects – some as large as Snowy 2.0. The good news is that the technical issues and tunnelling problems Snowy 2.0 has faced have taught us a great deal about how to overcome them.

The key challenge the engineers of Snowy 2.0 faced is the need for a 27-kilometre-long tunnel. Australia has hundreds of excellent options for off-river pumped hydro sites between Brisbane and Melbourne, located close to transmission lines and away from national parks and rivers. These options require much shorter tunnels compared to Snowy 2.0, meaning they would be much quicker to build.

Snowy 2.0 is no longer a bargain. But it’s still a very good long-term investment.

It’s Australia’s first large hydro project for many decades. Much has been learned, and we now have a highly skilled workforce

Like the Sydney Harbour Bridge, Snowy 2.0 will still be working a century after the controversy over cost blowouts is forgotten.The Conversation

Andrew Blakers, Professor of Engineering, Australian National University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Why the humble rabbit might be Australia’s worst introduced species

swarm of feral rabbits at a waterhole in Australia
Wild rabbits drinking from a waterhole on Wardang Island, 1938. Bettman/Getty
Ina Smith, CSIRO and Elena Smertina, CSIRO

The 19th century pastoralist Thomas Austin was homesick. He yearned for the pastimes of his home in England – especially rabbit hunting. He asked his family to send him some rabbits.

On Christmas Day in 1859, around two dozen wild and domestic rabbits arrived in Australia.

Delighted, Austin released them on his Barwon Park estate near Geelong. A member of the Acclimatisation Society of Victoria, Austin was among many working to bring European animal species to Australia. Of his efforts, he would later write:

the introduction of a few rabbits could do little harm and might provide a touch of home, in addition to a spot of hunting

Domestic rabbits first came to Australia with the First Fleet. But these introductions were domestic rabbits and didn’t establish.

Austin’s rabbits fared differently, as they were from wild genetic stock and much better suited to establishing self-sustaining populations. These rabbits began one of the most devastating biological invasions in Australia’s history. Rabbits, after all, breed like rabbits.


Every Australian knows common myna birds are bad, rabbits are worse and feral cats kill native animals unchecked.

But how do we decide what makes an introduced species “good” or “bad” – and will we ever concede that some species are here to stay?

Our new series on invasive species explores these questions.


It didn’t take long for rabbits to go from desirable to undesirable. In the 1950s, CSIRO scientists began releasing biocontrols – viruses lethal to rabbits. Rabbit numbers are now estimated at around 200 million, vastly lower than a century ago. Even so, rabbits are resilient. They remain one of Australia’s most widespread and damaging invasive species – perhaps even the worst.

historic engraving of rabbit hunting party.
An 1867 engraving shows the Duke of Edinburgh shooting rabbits in Thomas Austin’s Barwon Park estate, where rabbits were first successfully introduced. Engraving by Robert Bruce, 1867

What’s the issue with rabbits?

As rabbits spread across the continent, their numbers grew to plague proportions. Farmers came to loathe them for their ability to eat through pastures, spread weeds and dig huge warrens.

Desperate farmers resorted to traps and poisons, while many people worked as rabbiters. Some farmers were forced to abandon their properties.

In 1901, West Australian authorities saw rabbits approaching and began building enormously long fences to keep them out. It was pointless. By 1920, Australia had an estimated 10 billion rabbits.

map of australia showing the expansion of rabbits
Rabbits spread out rapidly across Australia after successfully gaining a foothold. CSIRO, CC BY-NC-ND

Rabbits don’t just affect farmers

As highly efficient grazers, rabbits compete for food with endangered yellow-footed and brush-tailed rock-wallabies, southern hairy-nosed wombats and many other native herbivores.

Rabbits consume up to a third of their body weight each day. Even at very low densities, they can stop regrowth of native trees and shrubs by selective grazing. Their digging of large warrens can increase erosion, degrade the surrounding land and accelerate the spread of invasive weeds.

Rabbits are incredibly good at making more rabbits. A doe can get pregnant and give birth about 30 days later to between three and eight kittens. A single doe can produce up to 50 kittens a year. Young rabbits begin breeding at around 4 months old.

Their sheer fecundity makes them hard for native or introduced predators to control. In some areas of Australia, European rabbits can breed year-round.

As a result, Australia’s rabbits threaten over 300 species of native animals and plants.

Rabbits also represent an abundant source of prey for foxes and feral cats, two introduced species which have become apex predators in Australia. These opportunistic hunters kill and eat threatened bilbies, bandicoots, lizards and birds, too. Foxes also target lambs and other young livestock, leading to major losses for farmers.

The sheer size of the rabbit population supports large numbers of cats and foxes, intensifying the damage to native species.

Biocontrols work – but are not a silver bullet

In the 1950s, scientists at CSIRO researched and then released the first biological control for rabbits, Myxoma virus. This virus causes the lethal disease myxomatosis, which slashed rabbit numbers by an estimated 95% in some areas.

Over time, the surviving rabbits built up resistance to Myxoma virus.

In 1984, another virus was identified in domestic rabbits in China. Rabbit calicivirus – otherwise known as Rabbit haemorrhagic disease virus – spread and infected rabbits in many countries.

In 1995, scientists began testing calicivirus on South Australia’s Wardang Island. It was an ideal biocontrol candidate, as it only infected rabbits, was stable in the environment and caused a disease with rapid onset and progress.

During testing, the virus was carried by flies to the mainland. In the wild, it proved highly effective at keeping rabbit numbers down, though surviving rabbits began to develop immunity.

About 20 years later, a highly virulent new strain appeared in Europe and spread to Australia, where it cut rabbit numbers by 60%.

In 2017, authorities released a new strain of the calicivirus, known as K5, to augment the effectiveness of the naturally circulating virus strains.

This year, sharp rises in rabbit numbers have been reported. We don’t yet know if this is due to a mild winter and plant growth after good rainfall, a reduction in effectiveness of the circulating viruses, or both.

So how can we get on top of this trend before the rabbits get out of hand again?

At CSIRO, we have developed a new way of growing rabbit calicivirus in the lab to speed up selection of new variants with potential to boost control.

We are also tracking virus strains circulating in Australia to map the activity of the various rabbit biocontrol viruses. Anyone can send in samples from rabbit carcasses to be tested through our citizen science project.

CSIRO researchers have begun investigating longer-term solutions such as genetic biocontrol (commonly known as gene drives) for key pests – including rabbits.

large numbers of rabbits in rural australia.
Rabbit populations can grow rapidly into plague proportions. JohnCarnemolla/Getty

There is no single answer

While rabbit viruses work very well for a time, they are not a silver bullet.

To keep numbers down long-term, we need to combine viruses with other control methods such as baiting, fumigation and destruction of rabbit warrens and, ultimately, novel technologies such as gene drives.

If we do nothing, we will once again have a true plague of rabbits. Keeping them under control is essential.The Conversation

Ina Smith, Senior Research Scientist, Team Leader Rabbit Biocontrol, CSIRO and Elena Smertina, Molecular Virologist, CSIRO

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Earth’s oldest evidence of life is written in stone – but it’s at risk of disappearing

A lakeshore under blue sky with curious black rock like shapes strewn across the sand.
Stromatolites at Hamelin Pool, Shark Bay, viewed from the boardwalk. Heidi Allen
Heidi Jane Allen, The University of Melbourne

Today, our planet is teeming with life, but it has not always looked the same. Long before forests reached skyward, animals walked on land, and the rise and fall of dinosaurs, our planet was shaped by a much smaller, more unassuming form of life. And we can still find traces of it today.

These ancient fossils, the earliest visible evidence of life on Earth, are known as microbialites.

Western Australia contains an extraordinary record of microbialites: from the oldest known examples, preserved in rocks almost 3.5 billion years old in the Pilbara, to living examples in the UNESCO World Heritage area of Shark Bay.

Our review of 50 years of microbialite research in Western Australia, published today in the journal Alcheringa, summarises what this archive can tell us about the evolution and resilience of life on Earth.

Despite a fossil record that spans billions of years, microbialites are surprisingly fragile. Fossil sites remain vulnerable to over-collection and degradation, while living microbialites are facing growing pressures.

At sites such as Lake Clifton and Shark Bay, some events may have already caused irreparable damage. One such example was in May 2024, when dozens of aurora chasers trampled 2,000-year-old thrombolites in a restricted area at Lake Clifton.

Red rocks in close up in a green landscape.
Fossil microbialites preserved in rocks almost 3.5 billion years old in Western Australia’s Pilbara region. Heidi Allen

Earth’s oldest evidence of life

Microbialites are mounded structures that come in many shapes and sizes. They form when communities of microbes either precipitate minerals, or trap and bind sediment.

Types of microbialites can be characterised by their internal structure. Stromatolites are the best known, and have distinctive layers. Thrombolites, by contrast, have a clotted texture.

Proterozoic stromatolites preserved in an array of shapes and sizes. Heidi Allen

The microbialite record can tell us a great deal about life on Earth. It gives us clues about where some of the earliest life lived, where we might look for life beyond Earth, and how our atmosphere became oxygen rich, paving the way for more complex life to follow.

Modern sites are particularly important because they help us better understand processes that formed microbialites in the ancient rock record. Living microbialites from Shark Bay have even been described as a “Rosetta Stone” for understanding their fossil counterparts.

Microbialites also preserve evidence of how life responded to environmental upheaval in the past. Western Australia’s microbialite record spans at least one, and potentially two, of Earth’s five major mass extinctions.

This deep-time record suggests microbialites may act as early indicators of ecological stress. Evidence suggests that the sudden increase of microbialites often preceded or coincided with major ecological disruption and mass extinction in the past.

A boardwalk on a lakeside under blue skies, with mounds in the sand.
The living thrombolite reef at Lake Clifton, Western Australia, where microbial communities continue to build structures much like those preserved in the ancient rock record. Heidi Allen

Yet our review highlights several significant knowledge gaps.

Scientists are still debating how to distinguish structures built by life from those produced by non-biological processes. We also cannot always say with certainty what environments ancient microbialites formed in.

There is further uncertainty about what controls the shape and structure (morphology) of microbialites. We also don’t fully know how closely modern examples reflect fossil forms.

Why the internal structure of thrombolites is clotted rather than layered, as in stromatolites, remains a conundrum. So does how far back they extend in the geological record. Western Australia may contain some of the oldest known thrombolites, but these examples have not yet been documented in detail.

Striated rocks in a grassy landscape with a hammer placed on them for scale.
2.7-billion-year-old thrombolites from Western Australia that remain undescribed. These may represent some of the oldest known thrombolites in the world. Heidi Allen

In short, Earth’s oldest biological record is not a finished story, although the gaps are slowly being filled. Preserving the evidence, both living and fossil, is essential if future scientists are to answer questions we don’t have answers for yet, or perhaps even to ask questions we have not yet thought to ask.

An ancient archive at risk

A sign at Lake Clifton reminding visitors to stay off the fragile living thrombolites, which can take decades or even centuries to recover from physical damage. Heidi Allen

Despite their geological longevity and seemingly unchanging nature, microbialites are surprisingly fragile. Their rock-like appearance can make this difficult to appreciate.

Living microbialites can be highly sensitive to environmental disturbance. Their extremely slow growth rates mean physical damage can take decades or centuries to repair, if at all.

Many modern microbialite sites face growing pressures from changes in water quality, climate change and increasing visitation.

Fossil microbialites are also vulnerable. Across Western Australia, tourism, inappropriate collecting and even scientific sampling can damage or diminish these irreplaceable sites. As geological features, their protection falls under geoheritage.

Aerial view in Hamelin Pool, Shark Bay. Paths still evident through the microbialites cut by carts more than 90 years ago are still visible today. Image courtesy of the Geological Survey of Western Australia, Department of Mines, Petroleum and Exploration. Heidi Allen, CC BY

Yet geoheritage remains poorly recognised and under resourced in Australia at both the federal and state levels. The 2021 Australian State of the Environment report concluded that “the overall outlook for geoheritage is poor” due to the lack of national frameworks, focus and resourcing for this area of heritage. Unfortunately, little has changed.

Today, we face an unprecedented and accelerating loss of biodiversity. The microbialite archive offers a deep-time perspective on how ecosystems respond to environmental change, ecological disruption and changing conditions. How far these insights can inform our understanding of the challenges facing life today remains an open question.

Just as important is whether the archives themselves, both living and fossil, will remain intact and accessible for future generations to investigate not only the questions we are asking today, but those we have yet to conceive.The Conversation

Heidi Jane Allen, Paleontologist, The University of Melbourne

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

There’s a hidden bias affecting what we know – and don’t know – about nature

A cute sugar glider sits on an extended palm.
S. Mahdi H. Miangoleh/Unsplash
Pietro Pollo, UNSW and Michael Kasumovic, UNSW

Our knowledge about life on Earth is built through research on how organisms function, evolve and interact with each another and the environment. Yet there are far more species on our planet than scientists can study in detail.

So how should scientists decide which species to focus on? Fairly representing all species seems like a useful approach. It’s like predicting an election result: we can’t interview every citizen, so we need a sample that truly represents the overall population.

What drives scientists to uncover nature’s mysteries is curiosity. So, the organisms chosen for research are determined by what makes scientists most curious. And that’s causing a problem with fair representation.

In our new research, we examined research in ecology and evolution (an umbrella term for biological sciences outside biomedicine) to understand which animals are most studied and why.

Our results suggest emotion plays a bigger role in research choices than scientists usually admit.

Which animals are studied?

Our world is mostly filled with invertebrates: creatures such as bugs, spiders, worms and slugs. Vertebrates (amphibians, birds, fish, mammals and reptiles) make up only 5% of all animal species on Earth. So, if scientists want to represent animals fairly in their work, most research should be on invertebrates.

To understand how scientists’ time is spent researching the diversity of animals, we analysed almost 1.4 million scientific articles from more than 600 journals. Unsurprisingly, we found that more than half of these articles focused on vertebrates, demonstrating a huge bias in what scientists prefer to study.

Our results also demonstrate things haven’t improved in over two decades (when this bias was first discovered), and in some cases have gotten worse. For example, the focus on fish in marine and freshwater biology research increased from 35.8% of articles in 2001 to 49.7% in 2025. This was all at the expense of the largest group of marine creatures, aquatic invertebrates such as molluscs, crustaceans, corals and more.

The bias we found was compounded by social media and news coverage, where popular animal groups attracted more attention from other scientists and the general public. Many scientists are therefore no different to everyone else in which animals they deem interesting or important.

Why does this happen?

Although many factors determine which research organisms scientists might select, emotions do play a significant role. Using an online survey, we asked 868 animal behaviour researchers about their experiences and preferences.

We found that popular groups in animal behaviour research, such as birds and mammals, were regarded more favourably than others, especially arachnids (such as spiders).

This is perhaps unsurprising as perceptions of animals are shaped early in childhood. Ingrained societal values – such as which animals are cute – tend to persist by the time someone becomes a scientist.

Fortunately, we found that familiarity breeds admiration. Participants that worked with a certain animal group tended to view that group more positively after their experience. In other words, they tried it and liked it.

Does it matter?

Studying the saliva of the Gila monster (a lizard) in the 1980s paved the way for recently developed weight loss drugs such as Ozempic. Research on snake, spider and scorpion toxins is being used for new pain-relieving drugs. The discovery of green fluorescent proteins from bioluminescent jellyfish in the 1960s led to the 2008 Nobel Prize because it sparked a scientific revolution by making it possible to tag individual cells.

These examples show that scientific advancement often requires serendipity and time. It disregards whether the organisms involved are charismatic. Creatures commonly seen as ugly, disgusting, or dangerous (which they rarely are) can be as, if not more, useful for society as fluffy, pretty animals.

Our work indicates that society’s negative perceptions of certain organisms, which are often rooted in disconnection from nature and misinformation, are shared by the very scientists responsible for understanding biological processes and patterns. Understanding scientists’ choices matters because these decisions shape the direction of scientific progress.

We urgently need to shift our perception of animals because human-made effects are accelerating biodiversity losses. For example, insects are declining at unprecedented rates, but we know little (if anything) about most insect species. Many haven’t even been described and may go extinct before we even know they existed. This means we’ll lose not just the benefits they bring to ecosystems, but any benefits they may have held for humanity.

What can we do?

There is hope. Our research shows that when people spend more time with the “ugly” and “scary” animals, they often appreciate them more. Once people realise that all organisms (even spiders) play a vital part in ecosystems, it becomes a lot easier to give these overlooked creatures the attention they deserve.

Organisations like Invertebrates Australia and many social media influencers are already helping by showing just how fascinating and important invertebrates really are.

But we still need more support to reduce research biases, especially from governments and universities. They can make a huge difference by funding research on never-before studied species and neglected animal groups.

If nothing changes, we risk slowing progress because we’re drawn to what looks cute. Next time an animal video pops up on your feed, try sharing something beyond the fluffy favourites. The less glamorous species are just as essential and just as worthy of our curiosity.The Conversation

Pietro Pollo, Visiting Fellow, Evolution and Ecology Research Centre, UNSW and Michael Kasumovic, Evolutionary Biologist, ARC Future Fellow, UNSW

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Honey bee hives have ‘living immune systems’ which defend against disease

Four bees seen on a hive.
Elizabeth Frost
Kenya Fernandes, University of Sydney

Open a honey bee hive on a warm afternoon and the first thing you’ll notice is movement.

Thousands of bees stream across the frames, tending brood, processing nectar and pollen, building wax, and maintaining the colony. A constant hum of activity and the smell of honey fill the air.

But this bustling environment is also home to something much smaller: a vast community of bacteria and fungi.

Some are harmless. Some are essential. Others can cause serious disease.

For honey bees, living together in such dense numbers creates an obvious problem. An infection that enters a colony has tens of thousands of potential hosts. Yet healthy honey bee colonies are remarkably good at keeping harmful microbes under control. How do they do it?

Our new research, published in ISME Communications, suggests that part of the answer lies in the way the hive is organised.

Mapping the hive’s defences

To understand how a colony keeps microbes under control, we first need to look at the hive as a whole.

The hive is not one place. Thousands of hexagonal wax cells are packed into combs, serving as nurseries, pantries, and storerooms.

At the centre is the brood, tended by nurse bees. Beyond it are the food stores, and at the edge is the entrance, where foragers come and go. Bees modify these spaces with materials they collect and produce.

Plant resins are turned into propolis, a sticky antimicrobial glue used to seal cracks and line parts of the hive. Nectar becomes honey, and pollen is fermented into “bee bread”.

Each of these materials has been studied before, but we wanted to know whether they work together as part of a coordinated defence system.

So we sampled 24 colonies from five apiaries in New South Wales, collecting honey, propolis, pollen, wax, and nurse and forager bees.

We used DNA sequencing to map bacterial and fungal communities, tested the ability of hive materials to inhibit microorganisms, and used nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (a chemical fingerprinting technique) to investigate their composition.

This allowed us to look at the hive as one connected system.

A floor plan for fighting disease

What we found was striking.

A healthy hive is not a sterile one. Many of the microorganisms living in and around a colony are harmless or beneficial, so eliminating them all would be neither possible nor desirable.

Instead, the colony uses different kinds of defence in different places: selective protection around the vulnerable brood and broader antimicrobial activity in more exposed parts of the hive.

Different materials also have different antimicrobial chemistry. For example, honey relies heavily on hydrogen peroxide – the same molecule in a bottle of antiseptic.

Propolis leans on flavonoids, the same class of plant compounds that give red wine and green tea their antioxidant kick.

Pollen’s defences look more like fermented food, rich in the short-chain acids produced by fermentation.

Rather than relying on one all-purpose disinfectant, the colony combines multiple types of antimicrobial activity across different parts of the hive. In effect, the hive has a chemical floor plan for disease defence.

Two people wearing protective suits working on a beehive.
Researchers sampled 24 bee colonies from five apiaries in New South Wales, collecting honey, propolis, pollen, wax, and nurse and forager bees. Kenya Fernandes

The landscape becomes part of the defence system

Perhaps the most important finding emerged when we looked beyond the hive.

The strongest predictor of the chemical potency of hive materials wasn’t disease history or health status. It was which apiary the hive came from.

This points to the surrounding landscape. Bees typically forage only a few kilometres from home, so local plants determine not only what they eat, but also the raw materials available for their chemical defences.

A colony surrounded by diverse flowering plants may therefore have access to a broader chemical toolkit than one foraging in a simplified landscape dominated by a single crop.

In other words, much of a colony’s chemical defences are built from what is growing outside its front door.

A broader view of bee health

We often think about threats to bee health in direct terms: the varroa mite, pesticides, and pathogens.

But our findings suggest that the ecological complexity of the landscape around a hive may also shape its ability to cope with disease.

As native vegetation is cleared and flowering resources become less diverse, bees lose access to a wider range of plants and the resources they provide. Maintaining diverse habitat around bee colonies could therefore be an important part of supporting healthy colonies.

And this idea may extend beyond honey bees. Ants, termites and stingless bees also use antimicrobial compounds to protect their colonies, often drawing on materials collected from their surroundings.

For these animals, the landscape may provide more than food and shelter. It may provide part of their medicine cabinet.The Conversation

Kenya Fernandes, Research Fellow, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Deadly fungi are harming Australia’s wild reptiles. This is how to stop the spread

A red-bellied black snake in leaf foliage.
A red-bellied black snake. Patrick Champagne
Patrick Champagne, The University of Queensland; Laura Grogan, The University of Queensland, and Shelly Butcher, The University of Queensland

With spring underway and the weather warming, reptiles are on the move in suburbs, parks and bushland across Australia. Snake catchers and wildlife carers are responding to calls for help, and reptile enthusiasts – known as “herpers” – are heading outdoors in search of their next sighting.

Australia is rich in reptiles, with many of them found nowhere else. But our diverse species face increasing threats from fungal diseases.

Imagine you call a snake catcher to take a carpet python out of your roof, and they later attend another call-out across town. The same equipment they used at your home could potentially carry fungal pathogens from one encounter to the next, moving disease between animals and places.

In our new research, we explore how people handling reptiles may unknowingly spread fungal diseases, and what they can do to reduce this happening. The fixes are simple, inexpensive and easy to use in the field.

Diseases already affecting our wildlife

Several fungal pathogens are now known to infect wild Australian reptiles, including Ophidiomyces ophidiicola, the cause of snake fungal disease, and Nannizziopsis barbatae, which affects eastern water dragons and carpet pythons.

These infections can cause severe skin disease, disrupt shedding – where a snake discards its outer layer of skin to allow for growth – and leave animals weak and emaciated. In many cases they can be fatal. Overseas, snake fungal disease has been linked to a fall in wild snake populations.

We know relatively little about which Australian reptile species are the most vulnerable, making prevention especially important. Since these diseases were found in captive Australian reptiles in the past, the pet trade is a likely source of introduction into wild populations.

A picture of a flaky, discoloured snake head.
Snake fungal disease (ophidiomycosis) has recently been found in carpet pythons in southeast Queensland. Shelly Butcher

Infections are not always visible

The obvious advice is to leave sick-looking reptiles alone. But that’s not enough.

Reptiles can carry and shed fungal pathogens without obvious signs of disease. An animal may be newly infected, tolerate the infection without becoming visibly sick, or have recently recovered.

The fungi also persist in the environment, in the soil or decaying matter. Research on Brisbane’s water dragons found they were more likely to become infected from contaminated habitat, rather than direct contact with infected dragons.

So, a muddy boot, a used snake bag or an unwashed snake hook could potentially move fungal pathogens between animals and places without anyone realising.

A picture showing the infected and damaged skin on the hind legs of a water dragon.
Infections can be obvious, like in this eastern water dragon. But reptiles can also carry the infection without clinical signs. Shelly Butcher

How people could spread deadly fungus

Many people handle wild reptiles, including snake catchers, wildlife carers, ecotourism operators, ecological consultants, researchers and recreational “herpers”. Importantly, you should avoid handling wild reptiles unless appropriately trained, authorised or licensed to do so.

People who handle reptiles often move between locations in a short period of time, taking equipment with them. Although wildlife biosecurity guidelines recommend routine disinfection of equipment and clothing to prevent pathogen spread, this is not routine outside specialist programs. This means fungal pathogens can easily hitch a ride.

We don’t yet have evidence that people are spreading reptile fungal pathogens between wild Australian reptile populations. But the pathways exist, and similar concerns have arisen with other wildlife diseases. Amphibian chytrid fungus, which has devastated frog populations worldwide, has been spread to remote refuges through human activities, including tourism.

People who keep pet reptiles and also handle wild reptiles should take particular care. Snake fungal disease was detected in captive Australian snakes years before it was found in the wild, highlighting the importance of strong biosecurity.

What to do if you handle reptiles

We recommend a few simple steps to reduce the risk of spreading fungal pathogens:

  • clean your hands between animals. Change disposable gloves, or use alcohol hand gel or wipes

  • use one bag per animal, carry spare bags and wash before using them again

  • clean your hooks and tools, then disinfect with 70% ethanol, diluted bleach or veterinary disinfectant and leave it on for 2-10 minutes

  • clean your boots between sites by removing soil and disinfecting

  • keep captive and wild reptiles separate, and use separate equipment

  • if you see a sick-looking reptile with crusty or discoloured skin, leave it where it is, take a photograph and contact your local wildlife hospital or veterinarian.

None of these measures are expensive or difficult: a spray bottle of disinfectant, spare gloves and a few extra bags can fit easily into a field kit. Tour operators, wildlife groups and reptile organisations can make basic biosecurity equipment such as brushes, buckets and disinfectant readily available.

The bulbous head of a central netted dragon.
A healthy central netted dragon. Preventing the spread of emerging fungal diseases is an important part of protecting Australia’s diverse and unique reptile fauna. Laura Grogan

Handle with care, not fear

We are not asking people to stop interacting with reptiles. Rescue work, relocation, and research all rely on people working safely with reptiles, under specific authorisations. Close encounters with wildlife can inspire curiosity and support conservation.

Instead, we are asking reptile handlers to treat biosecurity as part of responsible wildlife stewardship, as frog researchers have done for years. A small change in your routine could make a big difference for Australia’s most unique reptiles.The Conversation

Patrick Champagne, PhD Candidate in Biology, The University of Queensland; Laura Grogan, Senior Lecturer in Wildlife Science, The University of Queensland, and Shelly Butcher, PhD candidate in Wildlife Disease, The University of Queensland

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

A botanist weighs in on our love‑hate relationship with crepe myrtles

A crepe myrtle blossom is pink and pretty
Dion Wijaya/Pexels
Gregory Moore, The University of Melbourne

The crepe myrtle – a medium sized-tree often covered in an explosion of white, pink, purple or red flowers – lines many an Australian street. Lots of people love them but others think of them as an inadequate and over-planted species. Some even refer to them as “crap myrtle”, which is a little harsh.

In the right numbers, these small trees can be a good choice and do well in a small urban courtyard.

But perhaps large scale planting in urban streetscapes is not the best place for them – they can shed large volumes of flowers, which can get mushy and slippery as they decay.

Getting to know the crepe myrtle

Crepe myrtle is the common name for a number of Lagerstroemia species.

There are about 50 different species: one native to northern Australia.

That native, Lagerstroemia archeriana, is also known as the Queensland or native crepe myrtle; it’s also just crepe myrtle to many.

It is a purple or pink flowering species found in Queensland and Western Australia, and occurs naturally in drier forests. It has been cultivated for a long time but tends to be better suited to northern Australia.

However, the specimen that most people are familiar with is Lagerstroemia indica, the common crepe myrtle – also known as crape myrtle or crapemyrtle.

The name crepe is thought to relate to the crinkled nature of the flower petals resembling a crêpe (a type of French pancake).

Lagerstroemia indica is a small tree up to about five metres in height, with lovely smooth, silver to coppery coloured bark. But it is best known for its impressive and abundant flowering in white, pink, purple or red.

In full flower and en masse, it’s a stunner. It has been very widely planted in the streets of new urban developments where small blocks, large houses and narrow roads are de rigeuer.

However, Lagerstroemia indica can be prone to some fungal diseases like powdery mildew to which hybrid crepe myrtles are more resistant.

There are also hybrid crepe myrtles – usually a cross between Lagerstroemia indica and the Japanese crepe myrtle Lagerstroemia fauriei, which only produces white flowers.

These hybrids have the advantages of the more robust vigour, mottled bark and disease resistance of the Japanese species but retain the full colour range and magnificent flowering of Lagerstroemia indica. They also have great mottled bark – overall a magnificent combination.

Lush pink crepe myrtle flowers in full bloom during summer, creating a vibrant garden scene.
In the right place and in the right numbers, crepe myrtles can be a good choice. Q. Hưng Phạm/Pexels

A common street tree – but not always loved

Local governments love to plant crepe myrtle as a street tree – it’s compact, boasts impressive flowers and reaches structural maturity in five to ten years. It tolerates a variety of soils and climates, lives for up to 100 years

However, these trees can look or feel a bit small in dense housing estates with big houses; they are just not large enough to give an appropriate sense of scale to this kind of streetscape.

Crepe myrtles also provide less shade and cooling than larger trees, and fewer habitats for organisms such as birds, insects and fungi. Apart from the native version, most crepe myrtle species provide little food source (for humans or animals).

Compared to elms, oaks or eucalypts, the crepe myrtle is a modestly-sized tree; there are no vaulted cathedral-like ceilings of branches with crepe myrtle.

In some places residents top or lop the trees to promote more prolific flowering. This treatment, which shortens the lifespan of trees, is known colloquiolly as crape murder and is not recommended in Australia.

And people often pile clippings high around the trunks, which can result in trunk damage from pest and diseases. It is better to mulch under trees (but don’t let the clippings touch the trunk). You can prune young trees to shape their canopies for appearance.

Tree fashions come and go

Perhaps, to some people, the crepe myrtle just feels out of fashion.

Municipal horticulture has always had an element of fashion, even fads attached to it.

In the past there have been mass plantings of elms, palms, even southern conifers, and more recently of the ornamental pear (Pyrus calleryana) or Manchurian pear (Pyrus ussuriensis). There were doubts about the pears from the start given their history of weediness in the US. But now, despite some great spring flowering, they are going out of fashion and many people strongly dislike them.

Crepe myrtle seems to be on a similar trajectory to the pears. Despite some staunch support for this tree and its lovely flowers, they do not meet the long-term aspirations many people have for urban street trees. Some people fell out of love with them; others wanted them gone altogether.

They have their virtues

Despite the hate, crepe myrtles are likely to to be climate change hardy, as they tend to occur in hotter and drier regions of northern Australia and across Asia.

In the right place and in the right numbers, these small trees can be a good choice. They can look lovely in a garden or courtyard – but perhaps they are not the best pick for large scale planting in urban streetscapes.

In the longer term, only time will tell how successful crepe myrtle will be as street trees and in winning over the hearts and minds of residents.The Conversation

Gregory Moore, Senior Research Associate, School of Agriculture, Food and Ecosystem Sciences, The University of Melbourne

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Careel Head Road Shops and the Bangalley- Burrowong Creeks: Some History 
Careel Bay Marina Environs November 2024 - Spring Celebrations
Careel Bay Playing Fields History and Current
Careel Bay Steamer Wharf + Boatshed: some history 
Careel Creek 
Careel Creek - If you rebuild it they will come
Church Point Public Wharf - 1885 to 2025: Some History 
Clareville Beach
Clareville/Long Beach Reserve + some History
Clareville Public Wharf: 1885 to 1935 - Some History 
Coastal Stability Series: Cabbage Tree Bay To Barrenjoey To Observation Point by John Illingsworth, Pittwater Pathways, and Dr. Peter Mitchell OAM
Community Concerned Over the Increase of Plastic Products Being Used by the Northern Beaches Council for Installations in Pittwater's Environment
Cowan Track by Kevin Murray
Crown Reserves Improvement Fund Allocations 2021
Crown Reserves Improvement Fund 2022-23: $378,072 Allocated To Council For Weed Control - Governor Phillip Park Gets a Grant This Time: full details of all 11 sites
Crown Reserves Improvement Fund Allocations 2023-2024
Crown Reserves Grants 2025 Announced: Local focus on Weeds + Repairs to Long Reef Boardwalk + some pictures of council's recent works at Hitchcock Park - Careel Bay playing fields - CRIF 2025
Curl Curl To Freshwater Walk: October 2021 by Kevin Murray and Joe Mills
Currawong and Palm Beach Views - Winter 2018
Currawong-Mackerel-The Basin A Stroll In Early November 2021 - photos by Selena Griffith
Currawong State Park Currawong Beach +  Currawong Creek
Deep Creek To Warriewood Walk photos by Joe Mills
Microplastic assessment report 2026: Dee Why Lagoon Among Most Polluted in New South Wales - 56.55% of Manly Lagoon's plastic pollution is Artificial Turf - Pittwater Least Polluted
Milton Family Property History - Palm Beach By William (Bill) James Goddard II with photos courtesy of the Milton Family   - Snapperman to Sandy Point, Pittwater
Mona Vale Beach - A Stroll Along, Spring 2021 by Kevin Murray
Mona Vale Headland, Basin and Beach Restoration
Mona Vale Woolworths Front Entrance Gets Garden Upgrade: A Few Notes On The Site's History 
Mother Brushtail Killed On Barrenjoey Road: Baby Cried All Night - Powerful Owl Struck At Same Time At Careel Bay During Owlet Fledgling Season: calls for mitigation measures - The List of what you can do for those who ask 'What You I Do' as requested
Mount Murray Anderson Walking Track by Kevin Murray and Joe Mills
Mullet Creek
Muogamarra Nature Reserve in Cowan celebrates 90 years: a few insights into The Vision of John Duncan Tipper, Founder 
Muogamarra by Dr Peter Mitchell OAM and John Illingsworth
Off-leash Dog in Long Reef Aquatic Reserve Attacks Seal
Out and About July 2020 - Storm swell
Out & About: July 2024 - Barrenjoey To Paradise Beach To Bayview To Narrabeen + Middle Creek - by John Illingsworth, Adriaan van der Wallen, Joe Mills, Suzanne Daly, Jacqui Marlowe and AJG
Palm Beach Headland Becomes Australia’s First Urban Night Sky Place: Barrenjoey High School Alumni Marnie Ogg's Hard Work
Palm Beach Public Wharf: Some History 
Paradise Beach Baths renewal Complete - Taylor's Point Public Wharf Rebuild Underway
Realises Long-Held Dream For Everyone
Paradise Beach Wharf + Taylor's Wharf renewal projects: October 2024 pictorial update - update pics of Paradise Wharf and Pool renewal, pre-renewal Taylors Point wharf + a few others of Pittwater on a Spring Saturday afternoon
Pictures From The Past: Views Of Early Narrabeen Bridges - 1860 To 1966
Pittwater Beach Reserves Have Been Dedicated For Public Use Since 1887 - No 1.: Avalon Beach Reserve- Bequeathed By John Therry 
Pittwater Reserves: The Green Ways; Bungan Beach and Bungan Head Reserves:  A Headland Garden 
Pittwater Reserves, The Green Ways: Clareville Wharf and Taylor's Point Jetty
Pittwater Reserves: The Green Ways; Hordern, Wilshire Parks, McKay Reserve: From Beach to Estuary 
Pittwater Reserves - The Green Ways: Mona Vale's Village Greens a Map of the Historic Crown Lands Ethos Realised in The Village, Kitchener and Beeby Parks 
Pittwater Reserves: The Green Ways Bilgola Beach - The Cabbage Tree Gardens and Camping Grounds - Includes Bilgola - The Story Of A Politician, A Pilot and An Epicure by Tony Dawson and Anne Spencer  
Pittwater spring: waterbirds return to Wetlands
Pittwater's Koalas Driven to Extinction: Some History
Pittwater's Lone Rangers - 120 Years of Ku-Ring-Gai Chase and the Men of Flowers Inspired by Eccleston Du Faur 
Pittwater's Great Outdoors: Spotted To The North, South, East + West- June 2023:  Palm Beach Boat House rebuild going well - First day of Winter Rainbow over Turimetta - what's Blooming in the bush? + more by Joe Mills, Selena Griffith and Pittwater Online
Threatened Species Day 2025 + A few insights into Pittwater's Past + Present Threatened Species 
$378,072 Allocated To Council For Weed Control: Governor Phillip Park Gets a Grant This Time: full details of all 11 sites - Crown Reserves Improvement Fund (CRIF) March 2023
Topham Track Ku-Ring-Gai Chase NP,  August 2022 by Joe Mills and Kevin Murray
Towlers Bay Walking Track by Joe Mills
Trafalgar Square, Newport: A 'Commons' Park Dedicated By Private Landholders - The Green Heart Of This Community
Tranquil Turimetta Beach, April 2022 by Joe Mills
Tree Management Policy Passed
Trial to remove shark nets - NBC - Central Coast - Waverly approached to nominate a beach each
Turimetta Beach Reserve by Joe Mills, Bea Pierce and Lesley
Turimetta Beach Reserve: Old & New Images (by Kevin Murray) + Some History
Turimetta Headland
Turimetta Moods by Joe Mills: June 2023
Turimetta Moods (Week Ending June 23 2023) by Joe Mills
Turimetta Moods: June To July 2023 Pictures by Joe Mills
Turimetta Moods: July Becomes August 2023 by Joe Mills
Turimetta Moods: August Becomes September 2023 ; North Narrabeen - Turimetta - Warriewood - Mona Vale photographs by Joe Mills
Turimetta Moods August 2025 by Joe Mills
Turimetta Moods: Mid-September To Mid-October 2023 by Joe Mills
Turimetta Moods: Late Spring Becomes Summer 2023-2024 by Joe Mills
Turimetta Moods: Warriewood Wetlands Perimeter Walk October 2024 by Joe Mills
Turimetta Moods: November 2024 by Joe Mills
Turimetta Moods: March 2026 by Joe Mills - includes new Sydney Fish Markets

Pittwater's Birds

Attracting Insectivore Birds to Your Garden: DIY Natural Tick Control - small bird insectivores, species like the Silvereye, Spotted Pardalote, Gerygone, Fairywren and Thornbill, feed on ticks. Attracting these birds back into your garden will provide not only a residence for tick eaters but also the delightful moments watching these tiny birds provides.
Aussie Backyard Bird Count 2017: Take part from 23 - 29 October - how many birds live here?
Aussie Backyard Bird Count 2018 - Our Annual 'What Bird Is That?' Week Is Here! - This week the annual Aussie Backyard Bird Count runs from 22-28 October 2018. Pittwater is one of those places fortunate to have birds that thrive because of an Aquatic environment, a tall treed Bush environment and areas set aside for those that dwell closer to the ground, in a sand, scrub or earth environment. To take part all you need is 20 minutes and your favourite outdoor space. Head to the website and register as a Counter today! And if you're a teacher, check out BirdLife Australia's Bird Count curriculum-based lesson plans to get your students (or the whole school!) involved

Australian Predators of the Sky by Penny Olsen - published by National Library of Australia

Australian Raven  Australian Wood Duck Family at Newport

A Week In Pittwater Issue 128   A Week In Pittwater - June 2014 Issue 168

Baby Birds Spring 2015 - Rainbow Lorikeets in our Yard - for Children 

Baby Birds by Lynleigh Greig, Southern Cross Wildlife Care - what do if being chased by a nesting magpie or if you find a baby bird on the ground

Baby Kookaburras in our Backyard: Aussie Bird Count 2016 - October

Balloons Are The Number 1 Marine Debris Risk Of Mortality For Our Seabirds - Feb 2019 Study

Bangalley Mid-Winter   Barrenjoey Birds Bird Antics This Week: December 2016

Bird of the Month February 2019 by Michael Mannington

Birdland Above the Estuary - October 2012  Birds At Our Window   Birds at our Window - Winter 2014  Birdland June 2016

Birdsong Is a Lovesong at This time of The Year - Brown Falcon, Little Wattle Bird, Australian Pied cormorant, Mangrove or Striated Heron, Great Egret, Grey Butcherbird, White-faced Heron 

Bird Songs – poems about our birds by youngsters from yesterdays - for children Bird Week 2015: 19-25 October

Bird Songs For Spring 2016 For Children by Joanne Seve

Birds at Careel Creek this Week - November 2017: includes Bird Count 2017 for Local Birds - BirdLife Australia by postcode

Black Cockatoo photographed in the Narrabeen Catchment Reserves this week by Margaret G Woods - July 2019

Black-Necked Stork, Mycteria Australis, Now Endangered In NSW, Once Visited Pittwater: Breeding Pair shot in 1855

Black Swans on Narrabeen Lagoon - April 2013   Black Swans Pictorial

Blue-faced Honeyeaters Breeding In Pittwater

Brush Turkeys In Suburbia: There's An App For That - Citizen Scientists Called On To Spot Brush Turkeys In Their Backyards
Buff-banded Rail spotted at Careel Creek 22.12.2012: a breeding pair and a fluffy black chick

Cayley & Son - The life and Art of Neville Henry Cayley & Neville William Cayley by Penny Olsen - great new book on the art works on birds of these Australian gentlemen and a few insights from the author herself
Crimson Rosella - + Historical Articles on

Death By 775 Cuts: How Conservation Law Is Failing The Black-Throated Finch - new study 'How to Send a Finch Extinct' now published

Eastern Rosella - and a little more about our progression to protecting our birds instead of exporting them or decimating them.

Endangered Little Tern Fishing at Mona Vale Beach

‘Feather Map of Australia’: Citizen scientists can support the future of Australia's wetland birds: for Birdwatchers, school students and everyone who loves our estuarine and lagoon and wetland birds

First Week of Spring 2014

Fledging - Baby Birds coming to ground: Please try and Keep them close to Parent Birds - Please Put out shallow dishes of water in hot weather

Fledgling Common Koel Adopted by Red Wattlebird -Summer Bird fest 2013  Flegdlings of Summer - January 2012

Flocks of Colour by Penny Olsen - beautiful new Bird Book Celebrates the 'Land of the Parrots'

Friendly Goose at Palm Beach Wharf - Pittwater's Own Mother Goose

Front Page Issue 177  Front Page Issue 185 Front Page Issue 193 - Discarded Fishing Tackle killing shorebirds Front Page Issue 203 - Juvenile Brush Turkey  Front Page Issue 208 - Lyrebird by Marita Macrae Front Page Issue 219  Superb Fairy Wren Female  Front Page Issue 234: National Bird Week October 19-25  and the 2015 the Aussie Back Yard Bird Count: Australia's First Bird Counts - a 115 Year Legacy - with a small insight into our first zoos Front Page Issue 236: Bird Week 2015 Front Page Issue 244: watebirds Front Page Issue 260: White-face Heron at Careel Creek Front Page Issue 283: Pittwater + more birds for Bird Week/Aussie Bird Count  Front Page Issue 284: Pittwater + more birds for Bird Week/Aussie Bird Count Front Page Issue 285: Bird Week 2016  Front Page Issue 331: Spring Visitor Birds Return

G . E. Archer Russell (1881-1960) and His Passion For Avifauna From Narrabeen To Newport 

Glossy Black-Cockatoo Returns To Pittwater by Paul Wheeler Glossy Cockatoos - 6 spotted at Careel Bay February 2018

Grey Butcher Birds of Pittwater

Harry Wolstenholme (June 21, 1868 - October 14, 1930) Ornithologist Of Palm Beach, Bird Man Of Wahroonga 

INGLESIDE LAND RELEASE ON AGAIN BUT MANY CHALLENGES  AHEAD by David Palmer

Issue 60 May 2012 Birdland - Smiles- Beamings -Early -Winter - Blooms

Jayden Walsh’s Northern Beaches Big Year - courtesy Pittwater Natural Heritage Association

John Gould's Extinct and Endangered Mammals of Australia  by Dr. Fred Ford - Between 1850 and 1950 as many mammals disappeared from the Australian continent as had disappeared from the rest of the world between 1600 and 2000! Zoologist Fred Ford provides fascinating, and often poignant, stories of European attitudes and behaviour towards Australia's native fauna and connects these to the animal's fate today in this beautiful new book - our interview with the author

July 2012 Pittwater Environment Snippets; Birds, Sea and Flowerings

Juvenile Sea Eagle at Church Point - for children

King Parrots in Our Front Yard  

Kookaburra Turf Kookaburra Fledglings Summer 2013  Kookaburra Nesting Season by Ray Chappelow  Kookaburra Nest – Babies at 1.5 and 2.5 weeks old by Ray Chappelow  Kookaburra Nest – Babies at 3 and 4 weeks old by Ray Chappelow  Kookaburra Nest – Babies at 5 weeks old by Ray Chappelow Kookaburra and Pittwater Fledglings February 2020 to April 2020

Little Penguin Killed on Warriewood Beach: Offleash Dog the likely murderer

Lion Island's Little Penguins (Fairy Penguins) Get Fireproof Homes - thanks to NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service and the Fix it Sisters Shed

Long-Billed Corella

Lorikeet - Summer 2015 Nectar

Lyre Bird Sings in Local National Park - Flock of Black Cockatoos spotted - June 2019

Magpie's Melodic Melodies - For Children (includes 'The Magpie's Song' by F S Williamson)

Manly's Little Penguins to be vaccinated Against H5 Bird Flu + Lion Island Little Penguins Update - (Week 1 September 2026 Report: published August 30) + Little Penguins at Manly begin receiving bird flu vaccine + Update on NSW Cases - Locations (Week 5 September 2026 Update published September 27)

Masked Lapwing (Plover) - Reflected

May 2012 Birdland Smiles Beamings Early Winter Blooms 

Mistletoebird At Bayview

Musk Lorikeets In Pittwater: Pittwater Spotted Gum Flower Feast - May 2020

Nankeen Kestrel Feasting at Newport: May 2016

National Bird Week 2014 - Get Involved in the Aussie Backyard Bird Count: National Bird Week 2014 will take place between Monday 20 October and Sunday 26 October, 2014. BirdLife Australia and the Birds in Backyards team have come together to launch this year’s national Bird Week event the Aussie Backyard Bird Count! This is one the whole family can do together and become citizen scientists...

National Bird Week October 19-25  and the 2015 the Aussie Back Yard Bird Count: Australia's First Bird Counts - a 115 Year Legacy - with a small insight into our first zoos

Native Duck Hunting Season Opens in Tasmania and Victoria March 2018: hundreds of thousands of endangered birds being killed - 'legally'!

Nature 2015 Review Earth Air Water Stone

New Family of Barking Owls Seen in Bayview - Church Point by Pittwater Council

Noisy Visitors by Marita Macrae of PNHA 

Pittwater Becalmed  Pittwater Birds in Careel Creek Spring 2018   Pittwater Waterbirds Spring 2011  Pittwater Waterbirds - A Celebration for World Oceans Day 2015

Pittwater's Little Penguin Colony: The Saving of the Fairies of Lion Island Commenced 65 Years Ago this Year - 2019

Pittwater's Mother Nature for Mother's Day 2019

Pittwater's Waterhens: Some Notes - Narrabeen Creek Bird Gathering: Curious Juvenile Swamp Hen On Warriewood Boardwalk + Dusky Moorhens + Buff Banded Rails In Careel Creek

Plastic in 99 percent of seabirds by 2050 by CSIRO

Plover Appreciation Day September 16th 2015

Powerful and Precious by Lynleigh Grieg

Red Wattlebird Song - November 2012

Restoring The Diamond: every single drop. A Reason to Keep Dogs and Cats in at Night. 

Return Of Australasian Figbird Pair: A Reason To Keep The Trees - Aussie Bird Count 2023 (16–22 October) You can get involved here: aussiebirdcount.org.au

Salt Air Creatures Feb.2013

Scaly-breasted Lorikeet

Sea Birds off the Pittwater Coast: Albatross, Gannet, Skau + Australian Poets 1849, 1898 and 1930, 1932

Sea Eagle Juvenile at Church Point

Seagulls at Narrabeen Lagoon

Seen but Not Heard: Lilian Medland's Birds - Christobel Mattingley - one of Australia's premier Ornithological illustrators was a Queenscliff lady - 53 of her previously unpublished works have now been made available through the auspices of the National Library of Australia in a beautiful new book

7 Little Ducklings: Just Keep Paddling - Australian Wood Duck family take over local pool by Peta Wise 

Shag on a North Avalon Rock -  Seabirds for World Oceans Day 2012

Short-tailed Shearwaters Spring Migration 2013 

South-West North-East Issue 176 Pictorial

Spring 2012 - Birds are Splashing - Bees are Buzzing

Spring Becomes Summer 2014- Royal Spoonbill Pair at Careel Creek

Spring Notes 2018 - Royal Spoonbill in Careel Creek

Station Beach Off Leash Dog Area Proposal Ignores Current Uses Of Area, Environment, Long-Term Fauna Residents, Lack Of Safe Parking and Clearly Stated Intentions Of Proponents have your say until February 28, 2019

Summer 2013 BirdFest - Brown Thornbill  Summer 2013 BirdFest- Canoodlers and getting Wet to Cool off  Summer 2013 Bird Fest - Little Black Cormorant   Summer 2013 BirdFest - Magpie Lark

Summer BirdFest 2026: Play antics of New Locals - Blue-faced Honeyeaters Breeding In Pittwater

The Mopoke or Tawny Frogmouth – For Children - A little bit about these birds, an Australian Mopoke Fairy Story from 91 years ago, some poems and more - photo by Adrian Boddy
Winter Bird Party by Joanne Seve

New Shorebirds WingThing  For Youngsters Available To Download

A Shorebirds WingThing educational brochure for kids (A5) helps children learn about shorebirds, their life and journey. The 2021 revised brochure version was published in February 2021 and is available now. You can download a file copy here.

If you would like a free print copy of this brochure, please send a self-addressed envelope with A$1.10 postage (or larger if you would like it unfolded) affixed to: BirdLife Australia, Shorebird WingThing Request, 2-05Shorebird WingThing/60 Leicester St, Carlton VIC 3053.


Shorebird Identification Booklet

The Migratory Shorebird Program has just released the third edition of its hugely popular Shorebird Identification Booklet. The team has thoroughly revised and updated this pocket-sized companion for all shorebird counters and interested birders, with lots of useful information on our most common shorebirds, key identification features, sighting distribution maps and short articles on some of BirdLife’s shorebird activities. 

The booklet can be downloaded here in PDF file format: http://www.birdlife.org.au/documents/Shorebird_ID_Booklet_V3.pdf

Paper copies can be ordered as well, see http://www.birdlife.org.au/projects/shorebirds-2020/counter-resources for details.

Download BirdLife Australia's children’s education kit to help them learn more about our wading birdlife

Shorebirds are a group of wading birds that can be found feeding on swamps, tidal mudflats, estuaries, beaches and open country. For many people, shorebirds are just those brown birds feeding a long way out on the mud but they are actually a remarkably diverse collection of birds including stilts, sandpipers, snipe, curlews, godwits, plovers and oystercatchers. Each species is superbly adapted to suit its preferred habitat.  The Red-necked Stint is as small as a sparrow, with relatively short legs and bill that it pecks food from the surface of the mud with, whereas the Eastern Curlew is over two feet long with a exceptionally long legs and a massively curved beak that it thrusts deep down into the mud to pull out crabs, worms and other creatures hidden below the surface.

Some shorebirds are fairly drab in plumage, especially when they are visiting Australia in their non-breeding season, but when they migrate to their Arctic nesting grounds, they develop a vibrant flush of bright colours to attract a mate. We have 37 types of shorebirds that annually migrate to Australia on some of the most lengthy and arduous journeys in the animal kingdom, but there are also 18 shorebirds that call Australia home all year round.

What all our shorebirds have in common—be they large or small, seasoned traveller or homebody, brightly coloured or in muted tones—is that each species needs adequate safe areas where they can successfully feed and breed.

The National Shorebird Monitoring Program is managed and supported by BirdLife Australia. 

This project is supported by Glenelg Hopkins Catchment Management Authority and Hunter Local Land Services through funding from the Australian Government’s National Landcare Program. Funding from Helen Macpherson Smith Trust and Port Phillip Bay Fund is acknowledged. 

The National Shorebird Monitoring Program is made possible with the help of over 1,600 volunteers working in coastal and inland habitats all over Australia. 

The National Shorebird Monitoring program (started as the Shorebirds 2020 project initiated to re-invigorate monitoring around Australia) is raising awareness of how incredible shorebirds are, and actively engaging the community to participate in gathering information needed to conserve shorebirds. 

In the short term, the destruction of tidal ecosystems will need to be stopped, and our program is designed to strengthen the case for protecting these important habitats. 

In the long term, there will be a need to mitigate against the likely effects of climate change on a species that travels across the entire range of latitudes where impacts are likely. 

The identification and protection of critical areas for shorebirds will need to continue in order to guard against the potential threats associated with habitats in close proximity to nearly half the human population. 

Here in Australia, the place where these birds grow up and spend most of their lives, continued monitoring is necessary to inform the best management practice to maintain shorebird populations. 

BirdLife Australia believe that we can help secure a brighter future for these remarkable birds by educating stakeholders, gathering information on how and why shorebird populations are changing, and working to grow the community of people who care about shorebirds.

To find out more visit: http://www.birdlife.org.au/projects/shorebirds-2020/shorebirds-2020-program

Surfers for Climate

A sea-roots movement dedicated to mobilising and empowering surfers for continuous and positive climate action.

Surfers for Climate are coming together in lineups around the world to be the change we want to see.

With roughly 35 million surfers across the globe, our united tribe has a powerful voice. 

Add yours to the conversation by signing up here.

Surfers for Climate will keep you informed, involved and active on both the local and global issues and solutions around the climate crisis via our allies hub. 

Help us prevent our favourite spots from becoming fading stories of waves we used to surf.

Together we can protect our oceans and keep them thriving for future generations to create lifelong memories of their own.

Visit:  http://www.surfersforclimate.org.au/

Create a Habitat Stepping Stone!

Over 50 Pittwater households have already pledged to make a difference for our local wildlife, and you can too! Create a habitat stepping stone to help our wildlife out. It’s easy - just add a few beautiful habitat elements to your backyard or balcony to create a valuable wildlife-friendly stopover.

How it works

1) Discover: Visit the website below to find dozens of beautiful plants, nest boxes and water elements you can add to your backyard or balcony to help our local wildlife.

2) Pledge: Select three or more elements to add to your place. You can even show you care by choosing to have a bird appear on our online map.

3) Share: Join the Habitat Stepping Stones Facebook community to find out what’s happening in the natural world, and share your pics, tips and stories.

What you get                                  

• Enjoy the wonders of nature, right outside your window. • Free and discounted plants for your garden. • A Habitat Stepping Stone plaque for your front fence. • Local wildlife news and tips. • Become part of the Pittwater Habitat Stepping Stones community.

Get the kids involved and excited about helping out! www.HabitatSteppingStones.org.au

No computer? No problem -Just write to the address below and we’ll mail you everything you need. Habitat Stepping Stones, Department of Environmental Sciences, Macquarie University NSW 2109. This project is assisted by the NSW Government through its Environmental Trust

Newport Community Gardens

Anyone interested in joining our community garden group please feel free to come and visit us on Sunday at 10am at the Woolcott Reserve in Newport!


Keep in Touch with what's happening on Newport Garden's Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/newportcg/

Avalon Preservation Association


The Avalon Preservation Association, also known as Avalon Preservation Trust. We are a not for profit volunteer community group incorporated under the NSW Associations Act, established 50 years ago. We are committed to protecting your interests – to keeping guard over our natural and built environment throughout the Avalon area.

Membership of the association is open to all those residents and/or ratepayers of Avalon Beach and adjacent areas who support the aims and objectives of our Association.

Report illegal dumping

NSW Government

The RIDonline website lets you report the types of waste being dumped and its GPS location. Photos of the waste can also be added to the report.

The Environment Protection Authority (EPA), councils and Regional Illegal Dumping (RID) squads will use this information to investigate and, if appropriate, issue a fine or clean-up notice. Penalties for illegal dumping can be up to $15,000 and potential jail time for anybody caught illegally dumping within five years of a prior illegal dumping conviction.

The Green Team

Profile
This Youth-run, volunteer-based environment initiative has been attracting high praise from the founders of Living Ocean as much as other local environment groups recently. 
Creating Beach Cleans events, starting their own, sustainability days - ‘action speaks louder than words’ ethos is at the core of this group. 

Australian Native Foods website: http://www.anfil.org.au/

Wildlife Carers and Organisations in Pittwater:

Sydney Wildlife rescues, rehabilitates and releases sick, injured and orphaned native wildlife. From penguins, to possums and parrots, native wildlife of all descriptions passes through the caring hands of Sydney Wildlife rescuers and carers on a daily basis. We provide a genuine 24 hour, 7 day per week emergency advice, rescue and care service.

As well as caring for sick, injured and orphaned native wildlife, Sydney Wildlife is also involved in educating the community about native wildlife and its habitat. We provide educational talks to a wide range of groups and audiences including kindergartens, scouts, guides, a wide range of special interest groups and retirement villages. Talks are tailored to meet the needs and requirements of each group. 

Profile

Found an injured native animal? We're here to help.

Keep the animal contained, warm, quiet and undisturbed. Do not offer any food or water. Call Sydney Wildlife immediately on 9413 4300, or take the animal to your nearest vet. Generally there is no charge. Find out more at: www.sydneywildlife.org.au

Southern Cross Wildlife Care was launched over 6 years ago. It is the brainchild of Dr Howard Ralph, the founder and chief veterinarian. SCWC was established solely for the purpose of treating injured, sick and orphaned wildlife. No wild creature in need that passes through our doors is ever rejected. 

Profile

People can assist SCWC by volunteering their skills ie: veterinary; medical; experienced wildlife carers; fundraising; "IT" skills; media; admin; website etc. We are always having to address the issue of finances as we are a non commercial veterinary service for wildlife in need, who obviously don't have cheque books in their pouches. It is a constant concern and struggle of ours when we are pre-occupied with the care and treatment of the escalating amount of wildlife that we have to deal with. Just becoming a member of SCWC for $45 a year would be a great help. Regular monthly donations however small, would be a wonderful gift and we could plan ahead knowing that we had x amount of funds that we could count on. Our small team of volunteers are all unpaid even our amazing vet Howard, so all funds raised go directly towards our precious wildlife. SCWC is TAX DEDUCTIBLE.

Find out more at: southerncrosswildlifecare.org.au/wp/

Avalon Community Garden

Community Gardens bring people together and enrich communities. They build a sense of place and shared connection.

Profile

Avalon Community Garden is a community led initiative to create accessible food gardens in public places throughout the Pittwater area. Our aim is to share skills and knowledge in creating fabulous local, organic food. But it's not just about great food. We also aim to foster community connection, stimulate creative ideas for community resilience and celebrate our abundance. Open to all ages and skills, our first garden is on the grounds of Barrenjoey High School (off Tasman Road). Become part of this exciting initiative to change the world locally. 

Avalon Community Garden
2 Tasman Road
North Avalon

Newport Community Garden: Working Bee Second Sunday of the month

Newport Community Gardens Inc. is a not for profit incorporated association. The garden is in Woolcott Reserve.

Objectives
Local Northern Beaches residents creating sustainable gardens in public spaces
Strengthening the local community, improving health and reconnecting with nature
To establish ecologically sustainable gardens for the production of vegetables, herbs, fruit and companion plants within Pittwater area 
To enjoy and forge friendships through shared gardening.
Membership is open to all Community members willing to participate in establishing gardens and growing sustainable food.
Subscription based paid membership.
We meet at the garden between 9am – 12 noon
New members welcome

For enquiries contact newportcommunitygardenau@gmail.com

Living Ocean


Living Ocean was born in Whale Beach, on the Northern Beaches of Sydney, surrounded by water and set in an area of incredible beauty.
Living Ocean is a charity that promotes the awareness of human impact on the ocean, through research, education, creative activity in the community, and support of others who sustain ocean health and integrity.

And always celebrating and honouring the natural environment and the lifestyle that the ocean offers us.

Our whale research program builds on research that has been conducted off our coastline by our experts over many years and our Centre for Marine Studies enables students and others to become directly involved.

Through partnerships with individuals and organizations, we conceive, create and coordinate campaigns that educate all layers of our community – from our ‘No Plastic Please’ campaign, which is delivered in partnership with local schools, to film nights and lectures, aimed at the wider community.

Additionally, we raise funds for ocean-oriented conservation groups such as Sea Shepherd.

Donations are tax-deductable 
Permaculture Northern Beaches

Want to know where your food is coming from? 

Do you like to enrich the earth as much as benefit from it?

Find out more here:

Profile

What Does PNHA do?

PROFILE

About Pittwater Natural Heritage Association (PNHA)
With urbanisation, there are continuing pressures that threaten the beautiful natural environment of the Pittwater area. Some impacts are immediate and apparent, others are more gradual and less obvious. The Pittwater Natural Heritage Association has been formed to act to protect and preserve the Pittwater areas major and most valuable asset - its natural heritage. PNHA is an incorporated association seeking broad based community membership and support to enable it to have an effective and authoritative voice speaking out for the preservation of Pittwater's natural heritage. Please contact us for further information.

Our Aims
  • To raise public awareness of the conservation value of the natural heritage of the Pittwater area: its landforms, watercourses, soils and local native vegetation and fauna.
  • To raise public awareness of the threats to the long-term sustainability of Pittwater's natural heritage.
  • To foster individual and community responsibility for caring for this natural heritage.
  • To encourage Council and the NSW Government to adopt and implement policies and works which will conserve, sustain and enhance the natural heritage of Pittwater.
Act to Preserve and Protect!
If you would like to join us, please fill out the Membership Application Form ($20.00 annually - $10 concession)

Email: pnhainfo@gmail.com Or click on Logo to visit website.

Think before you print ; A kilo of recycled paper creates around 1.8 kilograms of carbon emissions, without taking into account the emissions produced from transporting the paper. So, before you send a document to print, think about how many kilograms of carbon emissions you could save by reading it on screen.

Friends Of Narrabeen Lagoon Catchment Activities

Bush Regeneration - Narrabeen Lagoon Catchment  
This is a wonderful way to become connected to nature and contribute to the health of the environment.  Over the weeks and months you can see positive changes as you give native species a better chance to thrive.  Wildlife appreciate the improvement in their habitat.

Belrose area - Thursday mornings 
Belrose area - Weekend mornings by arrangement
Contact: Phone or text Conny Harris on 0432 643 295

Wheeler Creek - Wednesday mornings 9-11am
Contact: Phone or text Judith Bennett on 0402 974 105
Or email: Friends of Narrabeen Lagoon Catchment : email@narrabeenlagoon.org.au

Pittwater's Environmental Foundation

Pittwater Environmental Foundation was established in 2006 to conserve and enhance the natural environment of the Pittwater local government area through the application of tax deductible donations, gifts and bequests. The Directors were appointed by Pittwater Council. 

 Profile

About 33% (about 1600 ha excluding National Parks) of the original pre-European bushland in Pittwater remains in a reasonably natural or undisturbed condition. Of this, only about 400ha remains in public ownership. All remaining natural bushland is subject to encroachment, illegal clearing, weed invasion, feral animals, altered drainage, bushfire hazard reduction requirements and other edge effects. Within Pittwater 38 species of plants or animals are listed as endangered or threatened under the Threatened Species Act. There are two endangered populations (Koala and Squirrel Glider) and eight endangered ecological communities or types of bushland. To visit their site please click on logo above.

Avalon Boomerang Bags


Avalon Boomerang Bags was introduced to us by Surfrider Foundation and Living Ocean, they both helped organise with the support of Pittwater Council the Recreational room at Avalon Community Centre which we worked from each Tuesday. This is the Hub of what is a Community initiative to help free Avalon of single use plastic bags and to generally spread the word of the overuse of plastic. 

Find out more and get involved.

"I bind myself today to the power of Heaven, the light of the sun, the brightness of the moon, the splendour of fire, the flashing of lightning, the swiftness of wind, the depth of the sea, the stability of the earth, the compactness of rocks." -  from the Prayer of Saint Patrick