Blue-faced Honeyeaters Return: Spring in Pittwater

Photos taken: Wednesday October 28 - 31, 2026: Careel Bay, PON backyard

This juvenile Blue-faced Honeyeater (above) was spotted catching insects and then eyeing off the nest it was just about to fly back up to - to feed a baby bird.

We've been hearing an unfamiliar bird-call in recent weeks and wondering 'what bird is that?' and now we know.

This one may be related to the family of Blue-faced Honeyeaters photographed in January 2026 - returning to the trees that tower above us.

Both the male and female tend the young birds, sometimes with the assistance of helpers. The fledglings remain with the parents for some time after fledging.

On Saturday morning, October 31, one of the babies, with a shorter body and tail, was spotted out of the nest and calling for food - and a feeder bird was getting insects from the tree surfaces and bringing them to it. 

Although a little too high up for the camera we have, some fuzzy pics of one of this year's little ones shows the difference in size and the difference in the colour around the eye when they're this young - hopefully a few clear photos of this littlie being fed may be yours to be see over the next few Issues:

The Blue-faced Honeyeater, Entomyzon cyanotis, is a large black, white and golden olive-green honeyeater with striking blue skin around the yellow to white eye. The crown, face and neck are black, with a narrow white band across the back of the neck. The upperparts and wings are a golden olive green, and the underparts are white, with a grey-black throat and upper breast. 

The blue facial skin is two-toned, with the lower half a brilliant cobalt blue. Juvenile birds are similar to the adults but the facial skin is yellow-green and the bib is a lighter grey. This honeyeater is noisy and gregarious, and is usually seen in pairs or small flocks. It is known as the Banana-bird in tropical areas, due to its habit of feeding on banana fruit and flowers.

The Blue-faced Honeyeater forms breeding pairs, and may sometimes be a cooperative breeder, where immature birds help the main breeding pair to feed nestlings - and what may have been captured by this photo. 

Most nests are made on the abandoned nests of Grey-crowned Babblers, Noisy, Silver-crowned and Little Friarbirds, Noisy Miner, Red Wattlebird, Australian Magpie, Magpie-Lark and, rarely, butcherbirds or the Chestnut-crowned Babbler. Sometimes the nests are not modified, but often they are added to and relined. If a new nest is built, it is a neat round cup of rough bark, linked with finer bark and grass. 

On the morning of Friday January 30 2026 these two fledglings and their parents were spotted bathing and drinking then drying off in the PON yard at Careel Bay.

Marita Macrae of the Pittwater Natural Heritage Association (PNHA) who has hosted many Bird Walks in Pittwater for decades, stated that it’s very unusual to see those birds here, and breeding too!, but not the first time though.

Blue-faced honeyeater (Entomyzon cyanotis), juvenile/fledgling pair in PON yard, January 30 2026 - they're wet as they just had a bath/drink in one of the 4 birdbaths in the PON yard - each at a compass point and at least 1 under shade as sun shifts during the day. They are calling for food from parents birds it would seem.

The Blue-faced honeyeater (Entomyzon cyanotis), is a passerine bird of the honeyeater family, Meliphagidae. It is the only member of its genus, and it is most closely related to honeyeaters of the genus Melithreptus. 

Three subspecies are recognised.:

• E. c. albipennis was described by John Gould in 1841 and is found in north Queensland, west through the Gulf of Carpentaria, in the Top End of the Northern Territory, and across into the Kimberley region of Western Australia. It has white on the wings and a discontinuous stripe on the nape. The wing-patch is pure white in the western part of its range, and is more cream towards the east. It has a longer bill and shorter tail than the nominate race. The blue-faced honeyeater also decreases in size with decreasing latitude, consistent with Bergmann's rule. Molecular work supports the current classification of this subspecies as distinct from the nominate subspecies cyanotis.
• E. c. cyanotis, the nominate form, is found from Cape York Peninsula south through Queensland and New South Wales, into the Riverina region, Victoria, and south-eastern South Australia.
• E. c. griseigularis is found in southwestern New Guinea and Cape York, and was described in 1909 by Dutch naturalist Eduard van Oort. It is much smaller than the other subspecies. The original name for this subspecies was harteri, but the type specimen, collected in Cooktown, was found to be an intergrade form. The new type was collected from Merauke. This subspecies intergrades with cyanotis at the base of the Cape York Peninsula, and the zone of intermediate forms is narrow. The white wing-patch is larger than that of cyanotis and smaller than that of albipennis. Only one bird (from Cape York) of this subspecies was sampled in a molecular study, and it was shown to be genetically close to cyanotis.

Adult bird of Subspecies cyanotis feeding, south-eastern Australia, feeding. Photo: Benjamin444

The Blue-faced Honeyeater is found in tropical, sub-tropical and wetter temperate or semi-arid zones. It is mostly found in open forests and woodlands close to water, as well as monsoon forests, mangroves and coastal heathlands. It is often seen in banana plantations, orchards, farm lands and in urban parks, gardens and golf courses.

The Blue-faced Honeyeater is found in northern and eastern mainland Australia, from the Kimberley region, Western Australia to near Adelaide, South Australia, being more common in the north of its range. They are considered sedentary in the north of its range, and locally nomadic in the south. It is not found in central southern New South Wales or eastern Victoria now. This species is also found in Papua New Guinea.

Around Wellington in central New South Wales, birds were once recorded over Winter months, and were more common in autumn around the Talbragar River. Birds were present all year round near Inverell in northern New South Wales, but noted to be flying eastwards from January to May, and westwards in June and July.

The Blue-faced Honeyeater feeds mostly on insects and other invertebrates, but also eats nectar and fruit from native and exotic plants. It forages in pairs or noisy flocks of up to seven birds (occasionally many more) on the bark and limbs of trees, as well as on flowers and foliage. These flocks tend to exclude other birds from the feeding area, but they do feed in association with other species such as Yellow-throated Miners and Little Friarbirds.

Their colouring reminds us of the Australasian Figbird Pair we've also seen nesting in our yard - although there are clear differences there too:

Australasian Figbirds(Sphecotheres vieilloti) pair

Males have bare, red skin around the eye, contrasting against a black crown and grey neck and throat. The remainder of the body is olive-green, except for a white under-tail area.  There are two distinct colour forms of the males of this species. Males north of Proserpine in Queensland have a yellow front.

Females have grey skin around the eye and lack distinctive head markings. They are brown-green above and dull-white below, streaked with brown. Both sexes have a blackish bill. 

Blue-faced Honeyeater leaping off the back fence this past week to take a feast of spider home

Watch out - Ground Nesting Birds are about everywhere in Spring!: Masked Lapwing Plovers

Marita Macrae, PNHA, sent in:

Tuesday Oct. 27 2026 - saw these 2 in a very unsuitable area on corner of Catalina and North Avalon Road. But checked tonight and no sign of eggs:

The pair on the grass near Nth Avalon road bus stop have a tiny chick. There is a Council sign on post there asking people not to disturb nesting birds:

Earlier in October 2026 the RSPCA sent in a Notice asking people to show more kindness towards our species of ground nesting birds - especially those they encounter in these birds historical ranges - it's not the wildlife's fault humans are cutting roads through their habitats and ecosystems.

Pittwater is one of the few places in Sydney you will encounter aquatic, bush and field or wetland birds - everything from Bush Stone Curlews, Buff Banded Rails to Painted Button Quails and Bush Turkeys lives here and raises their bubs here, and a lot of those bubs are emerging from their eggs now. 

See: Pittwater's Ground Nesting Birds 

That RSPCA Notice reads:

Be plover lovers: RSPCA NSW calls for kindness during nesting season

RSPCA NSW is calling on the community to be plover lovers this nesting season, as interactions between people and protective plover parents increase. 

Sadly, since the start of nesting season, RSPCA NSW has received several reports of young people disturbing or harassing plovers in their local areas. 

Plovers, also known as masked lapwings, are native birds and protected under the Biodiversity Conservation Act. 

They are commonly found in large grassy areas, where they usually lay their eggs on the ground in open spaces to better spot potential predators. 

Plover eggs take about 28 days to hatch and while chicks become remarkably independent soon after hatching, their parents remain highly protective of their nests and young. 

This protective behaviour can sometimes include swooping at people who come too close, but it is generally a warning display, and actual physical contact is rare. 

Although swooping can be unsettling, it is important to remember that plover parents are simply trying to protect their chicks and should be treated with patience and respect. 

FUN FACT: Along with occasional swooping and loud calls, plover parents may also pretend to have a broken wing to draw predators away from their nest or chicks. 

RSPCA Australia Chief Science Officer Dr Suzie Fowler stressed that the right response to nesting birds like plovers is crucial.  

“Although these swoops can be alarming, they are typically brief and targeted, rather than random acts of aggression,” Dr Fowler said. “Approaching nests or attempting to harm an animal can increase future risk of swooping and is never an appropriate response.” 

If you come across a nesting plover, the best thing you can do is keep your distance, take an alternative route where possible, and allow the family the short period of protection they need until the chicks are safely on their way. 

Plovers are devoted parents doing their best to keep their chicks safe at a vulnerable stage of life and deserve the love of their local communities. 

If you have animal welfare concerns, please call RSPCA NSW to investigate on 1300 CRUELTY (1300 278 3589) or 9770 7555.

nesting Masked Lapwing Plovers - in their usual spot at Sydney Sports Academy, Narrabeen, again this year. Photo: Joe Mills

Endangered plant Pomaderris mediora: Researchers Call out for sightings

Call-Out for Iconic Trees

A magnificent Grey Gum (E. punctata) example on the hill heading down Riviera Avenue with a Spotted Gum (Eucalyptus maculata) growing alongside it. Pic: AJG/PON

NSW Government introduces fire ant Biosecurity Control Order to enable long term monitoring & compliance

Announced: Monday October 26 2026

The NSW Government is implementing a fire ant Biosecurity Control Order covering a two-kilometre radius zone around the Enfield Intermodal Logistics centre following an intensive public engagement program in the area to educate businesses and people on how the regulation of the movement of high-risk fire ant carrier materials would work.

Consultation with local government, businesses and the community has helped shape the Control Order, which will today come into effect.

So far, the NSW Government has not detected any more fire ants since the initial nest found in late September despite nearly 400 public reports to the hotline.

Surveillance has been intensive around the inner 500-metre inner zone of the two-kilometre fire ant zone of activity where the control order will come into effect.

The team of nine sniffer dogs and 60 personnel have not detected any more fire ant nests along the streets, parks, or schools.

Due to the unique mix of heavy industrial, business, parkland and concentration of people where English was a second language in the two-kilometre focus zone, the expert advice was that the first priority had to be to raise awareness of fire ants and educate people on how to treat high risk materials.

A significant number of sites within the zone have been visited by biosecurity officers to discuss, educate and inspect premises.

A permanent community information drop-in centre has been set up in at Strathfield Park with a live high security fire ants' tank, that is a “ant farm” with live fire ants to show people what they look like. This follows pop-up stands at Chullora Marketplace and Bunnings over the last two weeks.

Now that the local community have a good awareness and understanding of what is required, the next step the NSW Government could take was to introduce the control order.

The introduction of the control order sets up a long-term approach of monitoring and compliance for the next six to 24 months.

The Control Order will only apply to the movement of high-risk carrier material such as turf, mulch, soil, potted plants and heavy equipment.

Businesses will need to properly treat and handle these types of materials before they can transport the materials out of or through the Control Zone.

The Control Order will not limit the movement of people going about their daily business.

It will only apply if you plan to carry a defined fire ant carrier material out of or through the Control Zone. Movements within the zone are not included.

It is expected the conditions in the Order will be achievable and NSW Government experts will keep working closely with businesses to support them in meeting the conditions.

The NSW Government is continuing to ask the community and businesses, if you suspect the presence of fire ants:

• LEAVE IT: Do not destroy or treat the nest or try to capture ants. Fire ants are prohibited matter in NSW. 
• SNAP IT: Safely take a clear photo or video for identification.
• CALL IT: Call the helpline on 1800 680 244 or submit an online form at www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/fire-ants

For information about red imported fire ants, visit the NSW Government’s website: nsw.gov.au/fireants

Minister for Regional NSW Tara Moriarty said:

"We've worked closely with local councils, businesses and the community to shape this Biosecurity Control Order so it is practical, targeted and based on the best available advice.

"Now that the community have that requisite understanding of what needs to be done it is reasonable and appropriate to now introduce the Control Order. This enables a longer-term approach to monitoring and managing the fire ant risk.

"For most people, daily life will continue as normal. People can go to work, visit friends and family, and move around the area as they always do. The restrictions only apply to the movement of specific high-risk materials that could carry fire ants.

"While there have been no further detections during the initial surveillance efforts, it is important we stay vigilant.

“Human movement of materials is the primary way fire ants spread, which is why we're asking everyone to stay alert and report anything suspicious."

Background on fire ants:

Fire ants are small, with ants in a colony varying between 2–6mm long, dark red-brown in colour with a darker brown-black abdomen.

You’re more likely to spot their nests before you see ants – nests appear as areas of bare, loose soil ranging from flat patches up to mounds reaching 40cm high with no visible entrance hole.

Fire ants thrive in humid, sunny regions and almost all of Australia is suitable habitat.

They are highly adaptable and nests are most commonly found in open, disturbed areas such as lawns, open parks and fields, garden beds, roadsides and medians, and utility pits.

More information available at: www.nsw.gov.au/regional-and-primary-industries/biosecurity/fire-ants-nsw

Fire ants - Pic: NSW Government

South Coast rail line to be electrified and duplicated in the largest investment in rail infrastructure in generations

Announced: Monday October 26 2026

A re-elected Minns Labor Government will deliver the largest single investment in heavy rail infrastructure in generations for the Illawarra and South Coast, committing $6.8 billion to the South Coast Rail Plan to electrify the Kiama to Bomaderry service and double the tracks at key bottlenecks, the government stated on Monday October 26.

'For over 100 years the South Coast Line has been the backbone of the Illawarra and Shoalhaven economies, but without significant investment it will not meet passenger and freight demand which is expected to grow by 29% and 26% respectively by 2041.

Communities in the Illawarra and Shoalhaven have been calling for improvements for decades, with reliability, capacity and speed constrained by steep terrain and single track sections.

The Minns Labor Government’s South Coast Rail Plan will deliver the rail infrastructure required to improve and increase services for the 7.6 million passengers who currently use it each year, and for the industry, tourism and jobs that the rail line supports.' the government said

Work already underway

'The people of the South Coast and Illawarra have heard promises of upgrades many times before.

This plan consists of an immediate investment of $621 million, with work already underway to upgrade critical infrastructure ahead of electrification and duplication work beginning.' the government stated

This includes:

• Renewal and upgrade of power and signalling infrastructure.
• Upgrading drainage, culverts and raising sections of track to reduce flooding impacts.
• Strengthening embankments and stabilising slopes to prevent landslips and rockfalls between Waterfall and Wollongong.
• Work to better protect critical rail infrastructure from bushfire and extreme heat conditions.

This work which has been informed by the Illawarra Rail Resilience Plan promised at the last election, is expected to reduce delays, increase frequency and reliability of services and reduce journey times.

Electrification and duplication

The government stated this investment will deliver increased track capacity, improved reliability and reduce journey times for the T4 Illawarra and South Coast lines. 

Key elements include:

• Electrify the Kiama to Bomaderry line: this will facilitate the replacement of the ageing diesel trains with new electric trains, and allow a direct connection to Central, removing the need for passengers to interchange at Kiama.
• Installation of additional tracks and passing loops between Wollongong to Kiama: this section is predominantly single track which limits capacity and reliability. Additional tracks will allow increased capacity, more frequent services with regular stopping patterns.
• Removing South Coast bottlenecks: detailed planning work will address key issues including flat junctions, level crossings, and station and track locations.
• Installing quadruple tracks between Hurstville to Sutherland: this section currently has two tracks which are shared by passenger and freight services on the South Coast Line and the T4 Illawarra Line. Doubling capacity will separate these two lines leading to increased frequency, capacity and reliability.

Detailed planning works for electrification and duplication will commence in 2027 and confirm the final scope and cost of the upgrades, with construction expected to be complete by the mid to late 2030s.

Investment in the South Coast

The government said 'the Minns Government has a strong record of delivering essential infrastructure on the South Coast, without privatising public assets.

After more than a decade of neglect under the former Government, this government is upgrading schools, hospitals and delivering critical road and transport projects the region needs.

We’re investing billions in major health infrastructure including upgrades to Shoalhaven Hospital, a new hospital for Shellharbour, a new Community Health Centre in Warrawong and upgrades at Wollongong Hospital.'

'The NSW Government is also delivering on our commitment to deliver Calderwood Public School and extend the Tripoli Way, a project neglected by the former government, which will ease congestion through Albion Park and Calderwood.

Major upgrades to Ulladulla High School and Milton Primary School are also ahead of schedule, and nine new fee-free public preschools are under construction.'

Premier of New South Wales Chris Minns said:

“We know that South Coast communities need faster, more frequent and more reliable trains which is why a re-elected NSW Labor Government will electrify and upgrade this train line through the largest investment in rail infrastructure in generations – all without privatising public assets.

“This isn’t just about better trains for commuters. It’s about backing local jobs, supporting industry and boosting tourism in the region.

“For too long, the Liberals only funded Sydney metros while regional communities missed out. We’re changing that by investing in regional communities up and down the Illawarra and South Coast.

“The South Coast have heard promises before, but they can judge us on what we’re delivering – new and upgraded schools that are being delivered ahead of schedule, Tripoli Way being delivered after decades of promises and the upgrade of Shoalhaven Hospital that is almost complete.”

Minister for Transport John Graham said:

“This is one of the biggest investments in South Coast rail since the steam trains first came down the line in the 1880s. The benefits of this will be felt from the Shoalhaven up to St George on the T4.

“If we don’t duplicate key sections of track, there’s no way to increase the capacity that this growing community will need.

“It’s 25 years since electric services were extended to Kiama, it’s now time to give the rest of those communities through to Bomaderry the same level of service as everyone else.

“While the transformational infrastructure is delivered, we’re starting work immediately to fix the key issues that affect the line on a day-to-day basis.”

Minister for the Illawarra and the South Coast and Member for Keira Ryan Park said:

"This is a generational investment in one of the most critical and historically under-serviced lines in the State.

"Our region has been calling for more investment and better services for decades. A re-elected NSW Labor Government will deliver that, with $6.8 billion to completely transform the South Coast rail line.

"This investment will mean more reliable services, faster journeys, and increased capacity, delivering better transport for more than 7.6 million passengers every single year.

"The Liberals and Nationals failed to invest in this region for more than a decade. Labor is delivering the essential services our communities rely on, without privatisation."

Minister for Regional Transport Jenny Aitchison said:

“We’re pleased to be delivering an investment of this size for passengers across the South Coast, ensuring they have a public transport network that is fit for purpose for generations to come.

“Communities have been calling for upgrades and improvements for decades, particularly electrification of the line from Kiama to Bomaderry. We have listened and are already getting on with essential infrastructure works.

“Not only will this investment see commuters receive the train network they deserve, but we’re also backing local jobs and regional industries in the process.

“We want to make it easier for people to travel to work and education and access healthcare across the state. This commitment of $6.8 billion is a massive investment in the communities of the South Coast.”

Member for South Coast Liza Buter said:

“This is an incredibly exciting announcement for the South Coast, delivering more frequent and reliable train services and finally allowing passengers to travel directly to Sydney without changing trains at Kiama.

“When I was elected, I made a commitment to fight for the infrastructure and essential services our community deserves. We are already seeing that commitment delivered through record investments in our hospitals, schools and roads, and now this extraordinary $6.8 billion commitment to transform our rail network.

“The South Coast has waited long enough. I make no apologies for continuing to fight for our fair share of investment, and I am incredibly proud that a re-elected Minns Labor Government is committed to delivering the modern, reliable rail network our community deserves.”

Member for Kiama Katelin McInerney said:

“This will be absolutely game changing for our community, building the public transport our growing region needs to get commuters out of their cars and onto a faster, reliable and a more frequent rail service. It will also be a game changer for tourism.

“This region was promised so much for 12 years, with nothing but broken promises by the previous Liberal leadership and this is the significant investment we need as we grow. I am so proud to be part of a government committed to making sure our regions get the investment we need and gets us ready for the future.”

As the section of the NSW South Coast Line between Kiama and Bomaderry runs on diesel-powered trains, the shift, should the South Coast Rail Plan progress in 2027, will also lessen reliability on a fossil fuel which has become increasingly expensive due to foreign politics, as well as be another step towards net zero in the state's transport system.

Inquiry Into Proposed Energy from Waste Facilities: NSW - Report Tabled

This Select Committee was established on 6 August 2025 to inquire into and report on proposed energy from waste facilities.

Background

Existing landfill capacity in Greater Sydney is expected to be reached by 2030, with advocates for incinerators highlighting the technology as a potential solution.

The amended SEARS for the proposed $1 billion Parkes Energy Recovery facility in the New South Wales central west was published by the NSW Planning Department on Tuesday October 20 2026 (Construction and operation of the Parkes Energy Recovery Facility to receive and process approximately 732,000 tonnes per annum of residual waste for the purpose of energy generation (electricity) via thermal treatment.) - the same day the Inquiry report was released.

Almost all of the waste processed would be transferred by rail from Sydney to the site, before being converted into up to 80 megawatts of base load power daily.

A recent ABC Landline report on proposed Energy from Waste (EfW) facilities highlighted deep-seated fears among regional Australian communities regarding potential long-term land, livestock, and crop contamination. 

As major Australian states like Victoria and New South Wales transition away from traditional landfills, regional areas are being selected to host massive rubbish incinerators. This has triggered immense friction between agricultural producers and project proponents.

October 20 2026:

A NSW Upper House committee has today tabled its final report for its inquiry into proposed waste-to-energy facilities in NSW.

The report considers the planning, assessment and regulation of such facilities, concerns about environmental and health impacts, regionally-restricted precincts and levels of community consultation.

It makes 22 recommendations to the NSW Government. Primary among these are that the currently designated facilities at Goulburn-Mulwaree and Parkes not be approved in the absence of critical elements including conclusive social licence. Other recommendations focus on the need for greater reinvestment into the waste sector for better future outcomes, and a moratorium on waste-to-energy proposals for an independent review to be undertaken on site selection criteria and processes.

Chair of the Committee, the Hon Nichole Overall MLC, said that ensuring affected communities have a meaningful role in decisions on large-scale, long-term infrastructure like waste-to-energy was paramount.

‘This inquiry has highlighted valid concerns from regional communities, particularly on the basis of thousands of tonnes of metropolitan waste being transported hundreds of kilometres to regional locations.

While potential environmental and economic benefits were presented, serious questions remain about site selection, cumulative impacts, regulatory oversight and community acceptance,’ Mrs Overall said.

‘Waste management must be well planned, environmentally responsible and above all, supported by host communities. Regulatory approval alone doesn’t establish social licence. Decisions must be informed by transparent processes, independent assessment and genuine opportunities for community input.’

Conducted over the past year, the inquiry received more than 1,400 submissions, held five public hearings and two public forums in Parkes and Goulburn-Mulwaree, and visited the Veolia Woodlawn Eco Precinct at Tarago. Evidence was heard from residents, farmers, councils, Aboriginal Land Councils, health and education professionals, industry, environmental groups, government agencies and technical experts.

‘I’m grateful to everyone who contributed to this inquiry, particularly the regional residents who shared their experiences and concerns about the proposed facilities. The evidence presented to the committee highlighted the importance of fairness, transparency and meaningful community engagement in determining how NSW manages its waste,’ Mrs Overall said.

Details concerning the inquiry, and a copy of the final report, can be found by the following links:

During the current parliament, the following reports and government responses have been tabled:

• Inquiry Report: Proposed energy from waste facilities - 40 Findings and 22 Recommendations
• Report tabled: Tue 20 October 2026
• Government response due: Due on Wed 20 January 2027

TERMS OF REFERENCE

(1) That a select committee be established to inquire into and report on proposed energy from waste facilities, and in particular:

(a) the performance of the technologies proposed for the Tarago and Parkes Energy Recovery Facilities as compared to leading thermal technologies employed in "state of the art" facilities internationally, noting such technologies as proposed are not employed anywhere else on the Eastern seaboard

(b) the spread of the emissions predicted and the quality of emissions to be generated

(c) health impacts from currently operating older technology waste incinerators as compared to the proposed newer technology

(d) impacts on human health including on regional town drinking water, rainwater harvesting and soil contamination

(e) the impact on agriculture locally and across the wider region

(f) alterations to the Parkes Special Activation Precinct specifically in relation to the proposed Energy Recovery Facility in that region

(g) impacts of waste-dumping over a number of decades in the Tarago region

(h) the methodology of emission monitoring employed by leading large scale waste-to-energy facilities in Australia and across the world

(i) alternative solutions to reduce and manage residual waste produced by Greater Sydney, and

(j) any other related matters.

The terms of reference for the inquiry were referred to the committee by the Legislative Council on 6 August 2025. 

Members

Chair: Nichole Overall (The Nationals, Legislative Council)

Deputy chair: Amanda Cohn (The Greens, Legislative Council)

Members:

Mark Banasiak (Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party, Legislative Council)

Sarah Kaine (Australian Labor Party, Legislative Council)

Natasha Maclaren-Jones (Liberal Party, Legislative Council)

Peter Primrose (Australian Labor Party, Legislative Council)

Rod Roberts (Independent, Legislative Council)

Emily Suvaal (Australian Labor Party, Legislative Council)

Recommendations

Recommendation 1 

That, for any waste-to-energy projects, the NSW Government commission independent, multidisciplinary health and environmental impact assessments to establish robust baseline conditions and enable future impacts to be measured reliably.

Recommendation 2 

That, where waste-to-energy facilities are supported by councils and communities, the NSW Government establish independent community–scientist monitoring arrangements that provide communities with direct access to environmental and emissions data, with monitoring and reporting conducted transparently and that can be independently verified and support the incorporation of citizen science, and that are not solely reliant on information provided by project proponents or government agencies.

Recommendation 3 

That the NSW Government commission an independent review of the Woodlawn Eco Precinct examining its compliance history, regulatory breaches and rectification measures.

Recommendation 4 

That the NSW Government commit to dramatically increased direct reinvestment of the waste levy to councils and the waste sector for infrastructure, education, and circular economy initiatives and outcomes.

Recommendation 5

That the NSW Government, where necessary, expand and support improvements to landfill capacity to ensure safe and reliable continuity of waste management in the short-to-medium term while other waste management measures are assessed and developed.

Recommendation 6 

That the NSW Government immediately undertake and publish a comprehensive cost-benefit analysis of approaches to waste management, including environmental and emissions impacts, in New South Wales to provide greater clarity to communities, councils and industry.

Recommendation 7 

That the NSW Government impose a moratorium on all current waste-to-energy proposals and commission an independent, transparent review of all designated precincts, including the site-selection criteria and processes, the restriction to regional areas, and the inconsistencies of the current restricted regional precinct model, with the full findings and analysis publicly released.

Recommendation 8 

That the NSW Government review the existing precinct model and give consideration to an alternative model for potential various forms of waste-to-energy facilities, focusing on:

• The need to evaluate proposals on their merits, including environmental performance, proximity to waste generation, infrastructure availability, cumulative impacts and community support
• The opportunity for potential sites to be nominated and considered against strict criteria, including community acceptance and
• The publication of results to ensure robust, consistent and comprehensive assessment.

Recommendation 9 

That the NSW Government establish clear minimum buffer distances between proposed waste-to-energy facilities, ensuring safe and appropriate distances from food production, schools and hospitals.

Recommendation 10 

That, where waste-to-energy facilities are supported by councils and communities, the NSW Government require clear financial transparency and contingency planning to minimise local government exposure to cost overruns, as well as prohibit contract terms that penalise councils for reducing waste sent to waste-to-energy facilities.

Recommendation 11 

That the NSW Environment Protection Authority establish a central, publicly accessible waste-to-energy compliance register to record breaches, incidents, audits, enforcement actions and outcomes. The register should be searchable by facility and date, distinguish alleged from confirmed breaches, and show whether matters have been resolved.

Recommendation 12

That, given the proposed facility at Woodlawn is located within the Sydney drinking water catchment, the NSW Environment Protection Authority, in consultation with WaterNSW, establish a regime of regular and independent site monitoring to ensure ongoing compliance with the facility's environmental protection licence and with the requirement that the development have a neutral of beneficial effect on water quality.

Recommendation 13 

That the NSW Government establish clear minimum requirements for consultation on large-scale infrastructure projects, ensuring engagement is not solely proponent-led, requires minimum thresholds for community engagement, consultation and provides host communities with access to independent technical, environmental and health information.

Recommendation 14 

That the NSW Government investigate and publicly report on the Peak Hill Local Aboriginal Land Council’s claim that the Aboriginal Land Rights Act 1993 has been breached in relation to the Parkes waste-to-energy proposal.

Recommendation 15 

That the NSW Government not proceed with approval of the current proposed regional New South Wales waste-to-energy facilities in the absence of numerous critical elements, but most significantly, the absence of conclusive social licence and community acceptance, including from local councils and Aboriginal Land Councils.

Recommendation 16 

That the NSW Government establish a consistent siting and community engagement framework for large-scale waste-to-energy facilities. The framework should establish minimum siting principles, require proponents to demonstrate that community and environmental impacts have been avoided or appropriately managed, mandate early and meaningful engagement with affected communities, local councils and First Nations peoples, and require proponents to identify tangible local community benefits.

Recommendation 17 

That, in addition to the measures proposed by the Plastic Reduction and Container Recycling Bill 2026, the NSW Government consider the most effective ways to disincentivise non-recycled plastic packaging.

Recommendation 18 

That the NSW Government strengthen upstream product stewardship measures to help reduce residual waste, including through extended producer responsibility, right-to-repair requirements, sustainable product design standards, restrictions on hazardous materials, and enhanced funding for the food organics and garden organics (FOGO) mandate.

Recommendation 19 

That, where waste-to-energy facilities are proposed, the NSW Government ensure they process only genuinely residual waste, so that waste-to-energy complements rather than displaces recycling.

Recommendation 20 

That the NSW Government undertake an independent review of the long-term impact of waste-to-energy technologies on recycling.

Recommendation 21 

That the NSW Government establish a dedicated agency with clear responsibility for the strategic planning, coordination and oversight of waste management services and infrastructure across New South Wales and establish an independent community advocate body to represent community interests in waste management decision-making.

Recommendation 22

That the NSW Government finalise and publish the NSW Waste and Circular Infrastructure Plan, setting out clear timelines, funding pathways and decision-making frameworks, before further consideration of waste-to-energy proposals. The Plan should also include a credible, transparent and measurable pathway to achieving the NSW Government’s target of an 80 per cent average resource recovery rate by 2030

Solar battery inspection results report

Last updated 20 October 2026 by Australian Government Clean Energy Regulator

This update provides an overview of the Small-scale Renewable Energy Scheme (SRES) inspections program for solar batteries installed from 1 July 2025.

The inspections program does not replace electrical safety regulations, or the inspection and compliance programs administered by relevant state and territory authorities. Instead, it complements these laws by using a cross-agency approach to communicate and address areas of concern.

We randomly select installations for inspection from the small-scale technology certificate (STC) applications we receive. We also conduct additional inspections on installations by installers who are found to be non-compliant.

We’ll inspect a statistically significant sample of all solar battery systems that claim STCs. We’ll closely monitor inspection results to identify potential safety issues early and work closely with industry to improve compliance. This includes working with state and territory electrical safety regulators who have the power to enforce standards.

This page will be updated regularly to reflect the latest results.

Overview and safety priorities

As a new inspections program under the SRES, our early results are tracking similar to other state and territory battery inspection programs. It’s too early to draw strong conclusions about the rate of technical compliance under the scheme.

As of 30 June 2026, 478,176 solar batteries have been installed across Australia since 1 July 2025, equating to 13.58 GWh of installed storage capacity. These solar batteries, distributed across households and businesses, represents a rapid acceleration of progress towards Australia’s target of 82% renewables by 2030.

Safety is a priority

By certifying the installation as compliant, installers are confirming that the installation is safe and eligible under the SRES. Where our inspections find unsafe and non-compliant systems, we won’t hesitate to use our compliance powers. This can result in installers being removed from the SRES. Our established systems that have supported over 4.4 million rooftop solar systems are now working to successfully support the growing number of solar battery installations. This includes identifying areas of non-compliance quickly and allowing us to drive continuous improvement through:

• ongoing and targeted education for installers in collaboration with Solar Accreditation Australia based on the latest inspection findings
• working with state and territory electrical safety regulators to update and refine the inspections program to better reflect emerging risks
• taking appropriate enforcement action against installers where necessary, including to declare installers ineligible to participate in the SRES if installations repeatedly fail to meet requirements.

Installed products must be on the Clean Energy Council’s approved product lists and meet relevant standards to be eligible under the SRES. The ongoing safety of approved products is the responsibility of the CEC, state and territory regulators and, where required, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) who manages a national recall system for electrical products. 

As of 17 December 2025, one eligible product under the SRES has been recalled. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) issued a voluntary electrical safety recall for Sigenergy single phase 8/10/12 kW energy controllers on 19 November 2025. Sigenergy is committed to rectifying this issue and is working with the ACCC, state and territory electrical safety regulators and installers to ensure the ongoing safety of the affected product.

Inspection results

As of 30 June 2026, we have conducted 3,425 solar battery inspections on installations that have received STCs. A breakdown of the inspections across the states and territories is as follows:

• 926 inspections in NSW
• 718 inspections in QLD
• 690 inspections in VIC
• 467 inspections in SA
• 392 inspections in WA
• 154 inspections in ACT
• 44 inspections in TAS
• 34 inspections in NT.

Inspections program checklist items

The inspections program uses a checklist developed with industry experts. The checklist items reflect regulations, standards and industry requirements. The checklist has over 90 items* that review compliance and safety.

In total, our inspectors have reported on over 296,969 checklist items across the 3,425 inspections.

Of these:

• 1.27% of checklist items have required rectification
• 5.26% of checklist items have been identified as areas for improvement
• 93.47% of checklist items have been found compliant.

* Not all checklist items apply to every installation. Relevant checklist items depend on the installation and battery type. Some installations may have more than one item marked.

Based on all inspections, the ratings are:

• 0.93% have been found unsafe.
• 61.78% have been found substandard but were safe to remain in operation.
• 37.28% have been found adequate and safe.

No installations had issues with the solar battery itself. Instead, all issues were due to non-compliant installation practices and substandard workmanship.

The issues leading to the unsafe installations included:

Wiring

• Loose connections in pre-assembled battery systems and associated wiring with signs of heat
• Pre-assembled battery system electrical work not in line with Australian standards, constituting a safety hazard which poses imminent risk.

Protections

• Neutral continuity was not maintained for all circuits operating on an alternative supply.
• The most common reason for installations to have technical non-compliance was due to labelling issues.

Incorrect or missing warning label

A compliant warning label must be installed at the main switchboard and at any intermediate distribution boards where a multimode inverter with an alternative supply is connected. The label must include the shutdown procedure for safe isolation and the statement ‘Neutral and earth circuits may be live under fault conditions’.

Incorrect or missing warning labels are a common non-compliance observed during inspections. A common misunderstanding is what constitutes an intermediate distribution board. Where a battery is connected via a gateway that contains a protective device (for example, a circuit breaker) this is considered a distribution board, and the required warning label must be installed.

Incorrect labelling of backed-up circuits

Battery systems may include a back-up supply. This can leave some or all circuits energised, even when the main switch is off. Some systems may also re energise after a short delay.

Clear labelling is required to reduce the risk of electric shock. This helps electricians and other qualified professionals work safely. Incorrect or missing labelling is a common non-compliance.

Backed-up circuits must be grouped together at the switchboard. This makes it easier to identify any sources of back-up power.

Incorrect labelling for emergency services

An energy storage (ES) identification label must be installed on or next to the meter box and switchboard. The label must be clearly visible when approaching the site.

The ES label alerts emergency services that a battery system is installed. This supports a safe emergency response. Missing or incorrectly placed ES labels are a common non-compliance.

The label must:

• be a green reflective sign marked ‘ES’, and
• be installed where it can be easily seen.

The most common wiring issues for substandard – technical non-compliant installations are:

Incorrectly configured or missing residual current device (RCD)

RCDs are designed to protect against electric shock and fire by cutting off power when an electrical fault occurs. RCDs must be correctly configured and installed wherever alternate supply circuits exist.

Insufficient mechanical and fire protection

Mechanical protection is installed and fire protection requirements are met to protect the battery system from mechanical damage by impact or fire spread.

Inadequate overcurrent protection for inverter circuits

Overcurrent protection is installed and appropriately designed to protect inverter output cabling and connected circuits if electrical conditions change or a fault occurs, including situations where current may be supplied from more than one source. Protection is applied by considering the circuit as a whole, including where higher currents could originate and how the circuit would be safely interrupted under fault conditions.

Government confirms NSW's commitment to mining and critical minerals on the global stage

On Tuesday October 27 2026 the Minns Government stated it will highlight the state's vital mining and critical minerals sector this week as Sydney hosts the International Mining and Resources Conference (IMARC).

The conference attracted more than 12,000 attendees from 120 countries and highlights the strength of the mining sector.

Mining in NSW directly employs around 31,000 people, 7,500 businesses form part of the wider supply chain, and the industry invests more than $14 billion a year, largely in regional communities.

'Coal mining remains the state’s largest export, while gold, copper, silver and other critical minerals and high-tech metals are important economic contributors and employers.' the government said

'To further cement NSW’s place as a world-leader in critical minerals mining, the Minns Labor Government is today releasing the Critical Minerals Skills Plan. 

'An Australian-first, the Plan sets out actions to develop the critical minerals workforce of the future, inspire the next generation of geoscientists, engineers and trades, while expanding understanding of earth sciences.' the government said in a release

'NSW is already an attractive destination for mining investment because of our experienced skills base, and the Skills Plan will further enhance our reputation among global investors.

The Plan includes initiatives to grow awareness of career opportunities in the sector, provide university students and emerging professionals with work experience, project and research opportunities, and improve the ability for local companies to pitch to investors.

We are also strengthening one of our important international relationships, renewing our agreement with the Japan Organization for Metals and Energy Security (JOGMEC).'

'Japan is NSW’s largest market for coal, with around 71 million tonnes exported in 2025-26, accounting for almost half of all exports. The Hunter Valley provides Japan with high-quality thermal coal for electricity generation, while the Illawarra coal fields have long supplied metallurgical coal for steelmaking.'

'This week, the NSW Government signed a renewed memorandum of understanding with JOGMEC, recognising NSW’s importance to Japan’s energy security, and supporting Japanese investment in the state’s critical minerals sector.'

The Minns Government stated it ''continues to demonstrate its commitment to the sector, including through': 

• The NSW Coal Industry 2026-50 policy document, recognising that coal mining will continue to play an important role in the NSW economy for decades to come, while providing certainty for workers, communities and industry. 
• The NSW Critical Minerals and High-Tech Metals Strategy 2024-35, delivering targeted programs across the critical minerals supply chain, including the Australia-first $250 million royalty deferral scheme to help eligible projects move into production. 
• Welcoming the Independent Planning Commission's approval of the Hunter Valley Operations coal mine, supporting 1,500 jobs and around $1 billion of investment in the coming year. 
• Proposed legislation, due to be introduced to the NSW Parliament next month, to protect 400 coal workers at the MACH Energy Mt Pleasant mine, providing certainty while the project makes its way through the planning system. 
• Providing $2.5 million in co-investment seed funding under the Critical Minerals Exploration Program, encouraging more exploration in the state and supporting companies to undertake drilling, geophysics and geochemistry.

'Developed following engagement with industry, education providers and unions, the Critical Minerals Skills Plan targets the skills required across the mining and exploration industry, including in geoscience, minerals processing, engineering, trades and environmental, social and governance practices.' the government said

'It positions the state to capitalise on the global shift to clean energy while creating long-term jobs and economic opportunities across regional communities. 

Critical minerals are essential for modern manufacturing, clean energy technologies and advanced industries. Finding and developing them in NSW means producing them in a stable jurisdiction with clear rules and strong environmental and regulatory standards.'

'NSW has the resources the world needs and the Minns Labor Government is making sure we have the skills, investment, and technology to turn that geological potential into jobs and economic opportunities.' the release states

To view the Critical Minerals Skills Plan visit www.nsw.gov.au/critical-minerals-skills-plan

Minister for Natural Resources Courtney Houssos said:

“NSW is a crucial part of the global supply chain for coal, gold, silver and copper, as this week’s conference showcases.

“The Minns Labor Government understands how important the mining industry is to the NSW economy – from its capacity to attract global capital to how it creates employment and economic opportunities in regional NSW.

“Mining has a long history in NSW and it will continue to play an important role in our economy into the future, particularly as global demand for critical minerals continues to grow.

“With the signing of a renewed JOGMEC agreement, we are demonstrating our long-term commitment to being a secure and stable jurisdiction, providing certainty to our international trading partners.

“Our new Skills Plan leans into what is already one of our key competitive advantages – that we have a broad and dynamic skills base for the mining industry. Continuing to invest in the critical minerals industry is good for workers, investors and regional communities.”

Re: MACH Energy Mt Pleasant coal mine See: October 2026 Environment News]

Draft Koala Conservation Strategy: Have Your Say

The Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water is seeking feedback on the Draft Koala Conservation Strategy.

Consultation period: 12th October 2026 - 9th November 2026

The Draft Koala Conservation Strategy:

• identifies key koala populations
• outlines a toolbox of conservation actions that can be applied to address key threats to koalas.

What is changing?

The draft strategy adopts a landscape-scale approach to koala conservation. This approach recognises that, to protect koalas, we must protect and restore the ecosystems they depend on.

The strategy will be delivered through the Saving our Species framework, ensuring koala conservation is integrated with other threatened species conservation efforts across the state.

The strategy will be delivered through the Saving our Species framework, integrating koala conservation with other threatened species conservation efforts across NSW.

Your feedback will help shape the final strategy to ensure it is practical, effective and informed by local knowledge.

A separate Implementation Plan will translate the strategy’s priorities into targeted, on-ground actions, providing a roadmap for coordinated delivery by government agencies, conservation partners and local communities.

We are interested in what level of detail you think should be in the Implementation Plan.

Download the strategy: The koala: draft Saving our Species conservation strategy (PDF 2.47 MB)

Have your say

Have your say by 9am on Monday 9 November 2026.

There are 2 ways to submit your feedback.

Online - use the form here

Email - to koala.strategy@environment.nsw.gov.au

Draft Document cover: for ID when downloading

NSW Snapper Harvest Strategy: Have Your Say

The government is seeking feedback on a draft harvest strategy for NSW Snapper. Share your views on the draft harvest strategy and management framework, which will contribute to the sustainable management of Snapper in NSW.

Public consultation commenced on 1 September 2026 and was initially set to close on 18 October 2026. The consultation period has been extended until 15 February 2027 to ensure opportunity for all stakeholders to provide feedback.

A draft harvest strategy for NSW Snapper has been developed, along with a new stock assessment identifying the stock is at sustainable but low levels.

Documents

• Draft NSW Snapper Harvest Strategy PDF (793.08 KB)
• NSW Snapper Stock Assessment PDF (3.29 MB)

The government states on the consultation webpage:

'Harvest strategies are a best-practice way to manage fisheries. They provide a clear plan for balancing environmental, economic, social and Aboriginal cultural interests while helping to keep fish stocks healthy for future generations.

A new integrated stock assessment has estimated the NSW component of the Snapper stock to be approximately 23% of unfished biomass. The assessment indicates the NSW stock has been building from lower levels since the 1990s, so there is some confidence stock biomass will continue increasing under similar catch levels.

The harvest strategy sets clear goals to build the NSW stock to target levels. The first goal is to build the stock to 30% of its unfished biomass. Over time, the aim is to build the stock further to 50% of unfished biomass.

To help achieve this building goal, the harvest strategy sets initial total annual catch (fishing mortality) to 300 tonnes per year, and a defined share to the commercial and recreational sectors. Assessment modelling estimates building to 30% of unfished biomass in 2035 under this level of total catch.

Based on current data, the following management changes would be needed to keep Snapper catches at or below the target level, and within sector shares. These arrangements will be reviewed and updated before commencement and as new information becomes available:'

*Recreational and charter boat limits are not proposed for Snapper.

**Current data indicates a monthly limit of around 950 kg per endorsement holder. Limits will be recalculated before commencement and for each fishing period.

Have your say by filling in a submission form HERE

Consultation will be open from Tuesday 1 September until Monday 15 February 2027.

Your feedback will help to finalise the harvest strategy and management actions to improve the long-term health of the NSW Snapper stock. Please review the harvest strategy and FAQs for further information.

NSW Yellowtail Kingfish Harvest Strategy: Have Your Say

The Government is seeking feedback on a draft harvest strategy for Yellowtail Kingfish in NSW. Share your views on the draft harvest strategy and management framework, which will contribute to the sustainable management of Yellowtail Kingfish in NSW.

Public consultation commenced on 1 September 2026 and was initially set to close on 18 October 2026. The consultation period has been extended until 15 February 2027 to ensure opportunity for all stakeholders to provide feedback.

The government states on the consultation webpage:

'A draft harvest strategy for NSW Yellowtail Kingfish has been developed, along with a new stock assessment identifying the stock as depleted.

Harvest strategies are a best-practice way to manage fisheries. They provide a clear plan for balancing environmental, economic, social and Aboriginal cultural interests while helping to keep fish stocks healthy for future generations.

A new integrated stock assessment has estimated the NSW component of the Yellowtail Kingfish stock to be approximately 5.5% of unfished biomass. The assessment indicates the NSW stock has remained at a relatively consistent but unresponsive level over the past 2 decades.

The harvest strategy sets clear goals to rebuild the NSW stock to healthy levels. The first goal is to rebuild the stock to 30% of its unfished biomass. Over time, the aim is to rebuild the stock further to 50% of unfished biomass.

To help achieve this rebuilding goal, the harvest strategy sets initial total annual catch (fishing mortality) to 120 tonnes per year, which will be shared equally between the recreational and commercial sectors (60 tonnes each). Assessment modelling estimates rebuilding to 20% of unfished biomass in around 9 years, and 30% in around 12 years under this level of total catch.

Recent average total catches are around 250 tonnes per year. Based on current data, the following management changes would be needed to keep Yellowtail Kingfish catches at or below the target level, and within sector shares. These arrangements will be reviewed and updated before commencement and as new information becomes available.

*A recreational catch and release only season may be needed if the bag, possession and boat limits are not sufficient to reduce recreational catch to 60 tonnes for each fishing period. The duration would be assessed based on updated recreational data.

**Current data indicates a monthly limit of around 650 kg per endorsement holder to maintain catch to 60 tonnes for each fishing period. Limits will be recalculated before commencement and for each fishing period.

Lord Howe Island waters are currently excluded from the proposed management changes, recognising Yellowtail Kingfish are likely to comprise a distinct, self-recruiting component of the eastern stock.

Have your say by filling in a submission form HERE.

Consultation will be open from Tuesday 1 September until Monday 15 February 2027.

Your feedback will help to finalise the harvest strategy and management actions to improve the long-term health of the NSW Yellowtail Kingfish stock. Please review the harvest strategy and FAQs for further information.

NSW consulting on Australia's first mandatory solar panel recycling scheme: Have your say

Opened: Monday September 21 2026
Closes: Monday 16 November 2026

The Minns Government is consulting on Australia's first mandatory solar panel recycling scheme to ensure valuable solar panel materials are recovered, reused and recycled rather than sent to landfill.

The proposed regulation will help drive investment and jobs in the solar recycling industry and support the potential development of a solar panel remanufacturing industry in NSW.

NSW leads the nation in solar uptake, with more than 1.18 million rooftop solar systems across homes, businesses, schools and community facilities. As these systems age, increasing numbers of solar panels are ending up in landfill.

Around 14,000 tonnes of solar panel waste is generated in NSW each year. This is predicted to increase to 89,000 tonnes by 2045.

The proposed mandatory product stewardship scheme would require solar panel brand owners to take responsibility for the end-of-life management of their products, helping fund collection, recycling and resource recovery across NSW.

Recycling solar panels is not simply about reducing waste. It is also about capturing valuable resources and creating new economic opportunities.

Valuable materials such as aluminium, glass, silicon, copper and silver can be recovered and reused in new products and manufacturing industries. As larger volumes of materials are recovered, NSW will be better placed to build local supply chains, strengthen manufacturing capability, encourage innovation and create skilled jobs across the state.

To help shape this opportunity, the NSW Government has released an issues paper alongside the draft regulation, seeking feedback on how the state can support the growth of solar panel recycling, remanufacturing and manufacturing industries.

Consultation will seek views from unions, industry, recyclers, manufacturers, researchers, local government, workers and the community on the opportunities, challenges and investment needed to build a circular economy for solar panels in NSW.

Feedback will inform the design of the mandatory product stewardship scheme with the aim of establishing a system that reduces waste, recovers valuable resources and positions NSW as a leader in solar panel recycling and circular manufacturing.

Submissions on the draft regulation and issues paper are now open. For more information and to have your say, visit /yoursay.epa.nsw.gov.au/solar.

Minister for the Environment Penny Sharpe said:

“NSW has embraced rooftop solar, and now we’re making sure those panels don’t become tomorrow’s landfill problem. Solar panels contain valuable materials that can be recovered and put back to work.

“A mandatory product stewardship scheme can help build a circular economy for solar panels, while supporting new recycling and manufacturing opportunities here in NSW.” 

Garigal + Ku-ring Gai National Park: 1080 Operation

NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service will be conducting a baiting program using manufactured baits, fresh baits and Canid Pest Ejectors (CPEs) containing 1080 poison (sodium fluroacetate) for the control of foxes. 

The program is continuous and ongoing between 1 August 2026 and 31 January 2027 in Garigal National Park. Don’t touch baits or ejector devices. Penalties apply for non-compliance. 

Ku-ring Gai Chase Applies from Fri 31 Jul 2026, 10.25pm to Mon 01 Feb 2027, 2.26am. 

NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service will be conducting a baiting program using manufactured baits, fresh baits and Canid Pest Ejectors (CPEs) containing 1080 poison (sodium fluroacetate) for the control of foxes. The program is continuous and ongoing between 1 August 2026 and 31 January 2027 in Ku-ring-gai Chase National Park.

All baiting locations are identifiable by signs.

Domestic pets are not permitted in NSW national parks and reserves. Pets and working dogs may be affected (1080 is lethal to cats and dogs). Pets and working dogs must be restrained or muzzled in the vicinity and must not enter the baiting location. In the event of accidental poisoning seek immediate veterinary assistance.

Fox baiting in these reserves is aimed at reducing their impact on threatened species.

For more information, contact the local park office on:

• Forestville 9451 3479 (business hours)
• NPWS after-hours call centre: 1300 056 294 (after hours)

Public comment opens on industrial port and dredging proposal threatening Exmouth Gulf-Ningaloo

• WA EPA has released Gascoyne Gateway’s environmental review documents for its proposed industrial port in Exmouth Gulf for public scrutiny. 
• AMCS-Protect Ningaloo is campaigning to stop the port that would attract shipping through a critical humpback whale resting and nursing ground, require extensive dredging and cause other wide-ranging impacts.
• Exmouth Gulf, Ningaloo will become WA’s newest marine park and is under formal assessment for National Heritage listing – AMCS-Protect Ningaloo maintains that an industrial port would be entirely incompatible with these vital conservation measures.

Australians have 12 weeks to voice their concerns about the industrialisation of Exmouth Gulf after Western Australia’s Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) today released the Environmental Review Document for Gascoyne Gateway’s port proposal for public comment. Submissions close 16 November 2026.

The Australian Marine Conservation Society states the proposal poses such widespread potential impacts to matters of national environmental significance that it has also triggered a federal assessment that will be part of this public comment period.

Gascoyne Gateway wants to build an industrial port 10km south of Exmouth town next to Qualing Pool – a rare freshwater oasis that the WA Government has earmarked as a class A nature reserve. The port would attract large vessels including fuel tankers, cargo ships, cruise liners and other heavy shipping into Exmouth Gulf, which the WA Government has earmarked for a marine park and which is under formal assessment by the Australian Government as a National Heritage treasure. 

This ecologically rich marine and coastal area is closely linked to the World Heritage-listed Ningaloo Coast and holds high conservation value. The area is home to many threatened and listed species, including dugongs, turtles, manta rays, sea snakes and dolphins, as well as corals, seagrass meadows, and sponge gardens. The proposed port would attract massive ships that would pass through a critical resting and nursing ground for one of the world’s largest humpback whale populations, posing serious threats of vessel strike and disturbance. 

Tens of thousands of people have joined AMCS-Protect Ningaloo, the Exmouth-based Cape Conservation Group and many local community members, in opposing the proposal since plans were first announced in 2020.  Over 20,000 emails have been sent to the current and past WA environment ministers calling for them to reject the proposal because it would fundamentally diminish the environmental values of Exmouth Gulf.

AMCS Chief Executive and Protect Ningaloo Director Paul Gamblin said: 

“The Gascoyne Gateway industrial port and dredging proposal is completely incompatible with the environmentally fragile Exmouth Gulf – Ningaloo’s Nursery – and would change this marine wonder forever.  

“An industrial port proposal, jutting nearly a kilometre into Exmouth Gulf and dredging of more than a million cubic metres of the seafloor in one of the world’s most important whale nursing grounds beggars belief.

“Tens of thousands of people have already made clear that industrialisation is unacceptable for Exmouth Gulf. People know that Exmouth Gulf obviously is no place for a port – its future is one of conservation and sustainable, light-touch economic activity, not industrialisation.

“Both the WA and federal governments have signalled that they are committed to protecting Exmouth Gulf so it’s time they made it clear that the future of this natural wonder is economic activity that treads lightly on its fragile environment. They must reject this proposal.

Cape Conservation Group Chair Denise Fitch said: “Exmouth Gulf is where Ningaloo’s whales rest and give birth, where our dugongs and manta rays feed. Dredging a port in the middle of this precious nursery goes against the spirit of stewardship that’s made Ningaloo the conservation and tourism success it has become. 

“Ningaloo is already under pressure from climate change. We’ve recently experienced unprecedented coral bleaching and seagrass damage from marine heatwaves, and further destruction from Cyclone Narelle. Now is not the moment to be adding industrial stressors to this fragile ecosystem. And this is no place for an industrial port. 

“We encourage those who know and love Ningaloo’s nursery to make a submission to the EPA and say no to this unwelcome proposal.”

Protect Ningaloo is calling on Gascoyne Gateway to do the right thing, as two other companies which pursued industrial projects in the Gulf have already done, and withdraw its proposal. 

Overview of Proposed Project

Gascoyne Gateway Ltd proposes to build, own and operate a multipurpose marine complex in Exmouth that will service a variety of vessels including but not limited to cruise liners and associated ecotourism activities, Defence and marine supply vessels. The project will not be utilised for livestock or iron ore.

The Proposal site is located 10 kilometres south of the Exmouth township and immediately south of the Ingram Street light industrial area; opposite the Exmouth landfill site and to the north of the Wilderness Estate residential area.

The proposal has a land-based component (including fuel storage and laydown, supporting marine facilities, desalination plant, renewables precinct, and access and utilities corridor), and a marine component (including marine infrastructure, vessel berths/channels, and anchorages).

An Environmental Review Document (ERD) has been prepared by Gascoyne Gateway Ltd in accordance with Environmental Protection Authority procedures and is released for public review.

The ERD describes the proposal, examines the likely environmental effects and the proposed environmental management procedures associated with the proposed development.

The Proposal includes a land based component (106.54 ha footprint within a 119.02 ha terrestrial development envelope) to support the marine infrastructure (61.63 ha marine footprint within and 79.44 ha marine development envelope) which includes a combination rock groyne and pylon steel construction to a berth-face. The berth face will require 13.5 m of cleared depth (at chart datum, equivalent to depth at LAT) to meet design vessel draughts, achieved by both natural depth and some dredging of sand and seabed limestone at the berth pocket. Marine construction includes piling and dredging, with dredge spoil used in the causeway construction. Three anchorage locations of 1nm diameter each are located in Exmouth Gulf approximately 9.5 km to the north east of the end of the causeway, within a nominal anchorage development envelope of 1153.14 ha. 

The ERD is available for download from Gascoyne Gateway Marine Complex | EPA Western Australia under 3. Assessment > Environmental Review.

The document is also available on the proponent’s website at Gascoyne Gateway Marine Complex.

Submissions should be made here: https://consultation.epa.wa.gov.au/assessment-and-compliance/gascoyne-gateway-marine-complex-per/

Submissions close November 16

PNHA Activities 2026

Our walks for 2026 are listed below. 

You are very welcome to bring friends and older children on these outings. Please book by emailing pnhainfo@gmail.com and include  your PHONE NUMBER so we can contact you in case of changes because of weather etc. 

Looking forward to getting out and about in our lovely area! 

Your PNHA Committee

Pittwater Natural Heritage Association

The Pittwater Natural Heritage Association has been formed to act to protect and preserve the Pittwater areas major and most valuable asset - its natural heritage.

PNHA is an incorporated association seeking broad based community membership and support to enable it to have an effective and authoritative voice speaking out for the preservation of Pittwater's natural heritage.

Our Aims

• To raise public awareness of the conservation value of the natural heritage of the Pittwater area: its landforms, watercourses, soils and local native vegetation and fauna.
• To raise public awareness of the threats to the long-term sustainability of Pittwater's natural heritage.
• To foster individual and community responsibility for caring for this natural heritage.
• To encourage Pittwater Council and the NSW Government to adopt and implement policies and works which will conserve, sustain and enhance the natural heritage of Pittwater.

Some of our interests and concerns include:

• Native Tree Canopy
• "Wildlife Friendly" Gardens
• Weed Infestation
• Keeping our Waterways Healthy
• Beaches and Dunes

Act to Preserve and Protect!

If you would like to join us, please fill out the Membership Form. Visit: https://pnha.org.au

Sunday September 27. Spring in the Bush: Terrey Hills

Meet 9am at corner of Mallawa Rd and Bulara St, Terrey Hills. Walk ends about 11am. With a focus on botany, we’ll see flowering plants in the Proteaceae plant family, waratahs, endangered Grevillea caleyi , and others in the major Australian Proteaceae plant family. You can choose to lengthen this walk which connects to the Perimeter Track. Birds, too.

Sunday October 25: Katandra by Night

Meet 6.45pm at Katandra Bushland Sanctuary on Lane Cove Rd Ingleside. Walk ends about 8.45pm. Sunset is about 7.15. The bush by night is wonderful. We hope to see fireflies again as on previous walks here in October. Bring a torch, or headtorch, preferably with a red light option so as not to dazzle possums. Moderate fitness needed for the bush track and steps. Limit: 15 people, so please book early. 

Sunday November 22: Deep Creek Reserve

Meet 9am in Deep Creek reserve, off Wakehurst Parkway. Walk ends about 11am. Birds and bushland. From the bridge across the creek we may see Dollarbirds, summer breeding migrants that nest in hollows, with their youngsters. Black Bitterns have been observed along the creek margins, so bring binoculars. 

Coming up at Kimbriki

Solar for apartment residents: Co-funding

Less than 2% of apartment buildings in NSW have solar installed, but the NSW Department of Climate Chnage, Energy, the Environment and Water are on a mission to change this.

Their Solar for Apartment Residents grant is co-funding shared solar panel installations on eligible apartment buildings and multi-unit dwellings and has already helped thousands of households.

They’ve extended the program to help more homeowners and renters reduce their energy bills and have also allocated extra funds through a separate Boost grant to help priority communities too.

Application closes: 4 December 2026, 5:00 pm

Share this with your Owners Corporation or Stata Manager and check your building's eligibility at: www.nsw.gov.au/grants-and-funding/solar-for-apartment-residents-soar-grant-program

Birdwood Park Bushcare Group Narrabeen

Sydney Wildlife (Sydney Metropolitan Wildlife Services) Needs People for the Rescue Line

We are calling on you to help save the rescue line because the current lack of operators is seriously worrying. Look at these faces! They need you! 

Every week we have around 15 shifts either not filled or with just one operator and the busy season is around the corner. This situation impacts on the operators, MOPs, vets and the animals, because the phone line is constantly busy. Already the baby possum season is ramping up with calls for urgent assistance for these vulnerable little ones.

We have an amazing team, but they can’t answer every call in Spring and Summer if they work on their own.  Please jump in and join us – you would be welcomed with open arms!  We offer lots of training and support and you can work from the office in the Lane Cove National Park or on your home computer.

If you are not able to help do you know someone (a friend or family member perhaps) who might be interested?

Please send us a message and we will get in touch. Please send our wonderful office admin Carolyn an email at  sydneywildliferescueline@gmail.com

622kg of Rubbish Collected from Local Beaches: Adopt your local beach program

This Tick Season: Freeze it - don't squeeze it

Notice of 1080 Poison Baiting

The NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS) will be conducting a baiting program using manufactured baits, fresh baits and Canid Pest Ejectors (CPE’s/ejectors) containing 1080 poison (sodium fluoroacetate) for the control of foxes. The program is continuous and ongoing for the protection of threatened species.

This notification is for the period to 31 July 2026 at the following locations:

• Garigal National Park
• Lane Cove National Park (baits only, no ejectors are used in Lane Cove National Park)
• Ku-ring-gai Chase National Park
• Sydney Harbour National Park – North Head (including the Quarantine Station), Dobroyd Head, Chowder Head & Bradleys Head managed by the NPWS
• The North Head Sanctuary managed by the Sydney Harbour Federation Trust
• The Australian Institute of Police Management, North Head

DO NOT TOUCH BAITS OR EJECTORS

All baiting locations will be identifiable by signs.

Please be reminded that domestic pets are not permitted on NPWS Estate. Pets and working dogs may be affected (1080 is lethal to cats and dogs). Pets and working dogs must be restrained or muzzled in the vicinity and must not enter the baiting location. Penalties apply for non-compliance.

In the event of accidental poisoning seek immediate veterinary assistance.

For further information please call the local NPWS office on:

NPWS Sydney North (Middle Head) Area office: 9960 6266

NPWS Sydney North (Forestville) Area office: 9451 3479

NPWS North West Sydney (Lane Cove NP) Area office: 8448 0400

NPWS after-hours Duty officer service: 1300 056 294

Sydney Harbour Federation Trust: 8969 2128

Volunteers for Barrenjoey Lighthouse Tours needed

Johnson Brothers Mitre 10 Recycling Batteries: at Mona Vale + Avalon Beach

Over 18,600 tonnes of batteries are discarded to landfill in Australia each year, even though 95% of a battery can be recycled!

That’s why we are rolling out battery recycling units across our stores! Our battery recycling units accept household, button cell, laptop, and power tool batteries as well as mobile phones! 

How To Dispose Of Your Batteries Safely: 

1. Collect Your Used Batteries: Gather all used batteries from your home. Our battery recycling units accept batteries from a wide range of products such as household, button cell, laptop, and power tool batteries.
2. Tape Your Terminals: Tape the terminals of used batteries with clear sticky tape.
3. Drop Them Off: Come and visit your nearest participating store to recycle your batteries for free (at Johnson Brothers Mitre 10 Mona Vale and Avalon Beach).
4. Feel Good About Your Impact: By recycling your batteries, you're helping support a healthier planet by keeping hazardous material out of landfills and conserving resources.

Environmental Benefits

• Reduces hazardous waste in landfill
• Conserves natural resources by promoting the use of recycled materials
• Keep toxic materials out of waterways 

Plastic Bread Ties For Wheelchairs

Stay Safe From Mosquitoes 

Mountain Bike Incidents On Public Land: Survey

Report fox sightings

marine wildlife rescue group on the Central Coast

A new wildlife group was launched on the Central Coast on Saturday, December 10, 2022.

Marine Wildlife Rescue Central Coast (MWRCC) had its official launch at The Entrance Boat Shed at 10am.

The group comprises current and former members of ASTR, ORRCA, Sea Shepherd, Greenpeace, WIRES and Wildlife ARC, as well as vets, academics, and people from all walks of life.

Well known marine wildlife advocate and activist Cathy Gilmore is spearheading the organisation.

“We believe that it is time the Central Coast looked after its own marine wildlife, and not be under the control or directed by groups that aren’t based locally,” Gilmore said.

“We have the local knowledge and are set up to respond and help injured animals more quickly.

“This also means that donations and money fundraised will go directly into helping our local marine creatures, and not get tied up elsewhere in the state.”

The organisation plans to have rehabilitation facilities and rescue kits placed in strategic locations around the region.

MWRCC will also be in touch with Indigenous groups to learn the traditional importance of the local marine environment and its inhabitants.

“We want to work with these groups and share knowledge between us,” Gilmore said.

“This is an opportunity to help save and protect our local marine wildlife, so if you have passion and commitment, then you are more than welcome to join us.”

Marine Wildlife Rescue Central Coast has a Facebook page where you may contact members. Visit: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100076317431064

• Ph: 0478 439 965
• Email: marinewildlifecc@gmail.com
• Instagram: marinewildliferescuecc

Watch out - shorebirds about

Possums In Your Roof?: do the right thing

Aviaries + Possum Release Sites Needed

Mona Vale Dunes bushcare group: 2026 Dates

What’s Happening? Mona Vale Dunes Bushcare group catch-up. 

In 2026 our usual work mornings will be the second Saturday and third Thursday of each month. You can come to either or both. 

We are maintaining an area south of Golf Avenue. This was cleared of dense lantana, green cestrum and ground Asparagus in 2019-2020. 600 tubestock were planted in June 2021, and natural regeneration is ongoing. 

Photos: The site In November 2019, chainsaws at the ready. In July 2025, look at the difference - coastal dune vegetation instead of dense weeds. But maintenance continues and bushcarers are on the job. Can you join us?

(access to this southern of MV Dunes  - parking near Mona Vale Headland reserve, or walk from Golf Ave.) 

For comparison, see this image of MV dunes in 1969!, taken from atop the home units at the end of Golf Avenue. 

2026 Dates

Bangalley Headland WPA Bushcare 2026

Watch out for PNHA signs telling you about bush regeneration and our local environment. This is one of many coming up.

Bushcare in Pittwater: where + when

Friends Of Narrabeen Lagoon Catchment Activities

Bush Regeneration - Narrabeen Lagoon Catchment  

This is a wonderful way to become connected to nature and contribute to the health of the environment.  Over the weeks and months you can see positive changes as you give native species a better chance to thrive.  Wildlife appreciate the improvement in their habitat.

Belrose area - Thursday mornings 

Belrose area - Weekend mornings by arrangement

Contact: Phone or text Conny Harris on 0432 643 295

Wheeler Creek - Wednesday mornings 9-11am

Contact: Phone or text Judith Bennett on 0402 974 105

Or email: Friends of Narrabeen Lagoon Catchment : email@narrabeenlagoon.org.au

Gardens and Environment Groups and Organisations in Pittwater

November 2024

• A Turtle-y Awesome Rescue by Whale Beach SLSC + Shell us what you see this Summer: TurtleWatch needs your help!

January 2025

• Are Turtles not Safe in the Estuary? Green Turtle Killed in Pittwater Prompts Renewed Calls for Boaters to slow down, adhere to the speed limit

Pittwater's Birds

New Shorebirds WingThing  For Youngsters Available To Download

A Shorebirds WingThing educational brochure for kids (A5) helps children learn about shorebirds, their life and journey. The 2021 revised brochure version was published in February 2021 and is available now. You can download a file copy here.

If you would like a free print copy of this brochure, please send a self-addressed envelope with A$1.10 postage (or larger if you would like it unfolded) affixed to: BirdLife Australia, Shorebird WingThing Request, 2-05Shorebird WingThing/60 Leicester St, Carlton VIC 3053.

Shorebird Identification Booklet

The Migratory Shorebird Program has just released the third edition of its hugely popular Shorebird Identification Booklet. The team has thoroughly revised and updated this pocket-sized companion for all shorebird counters and interested birders, with lots of useful information on our most common shorebirds, key identification features, sighting distribution maps and short articles on some of BirdLife’s shorebird activities. 

The booklet can be downloaded here in PDF file format: http://www.birdlife.org.au/documents/Shorebird_ID_Booklet_V3.pdf

Paper copies can be ordered as well, see http://www.birdlife.org.au/projects/shorebirds-2020/counter-resources for details.

Download BirdLife Australia's children’s education kit to help them learn more about our wading birdlife

Shorebirds are a group of wading birds that can be found feeding on swamps, tidal mudflats, estuaries, beaches and open country. For many people, shorebirds are just those brown birds feeding a long way out on the mud but they are actually a remarkably diverse collection of birds including stilts, sandpipers, snipe, curlews, godwits, plovers and oystercatchers. Each species is superbly adapted to suit its preferred habitat.  The Red-necked Stint is as small as a sparrow, with relatively short legs and bill that it pecks food from the surface of the mud with, whereas the Eastern Curlew is over two feet long with a exceptionally long legs and a massively curved beak that it thrusts deep down into the mud to pull out crabs, worms and other creatures hidden below the surface.

Some shorebirds are fairly drab in plumage, especially when they are visiting Australia in their non-breeding season, but when they migrate to their Arctic nesting grounds, they develop a vibrant flush of bright colours to attract a mate. We have 37 types of shorebirds that annually migrate to Australia on some of the most lengthy and arduous journeys in the animal kingdom, but there are also 18 shorebirds that call Australia home all year round.

What all our shorebirds have in common—be they large or small, seasoned traveller or homebody, brightly coloured or in muted tones—is that each species needs adequate safe areas where they can successfully feed and breed.

The National Shorebird Monitoring Program is managed and supported by BirdLife Australia. 

This project is supported by Glenelg Hopkins Catchment Management Authority and Hunter Local Land Services through funding from the Australian Government’s National Landcare Program. Funding from Helen Macpherson Smith Trust and Port Phillip Bay Fund is acknowledged. 

The National Shorebird Monitoring Program is made possible with the help of over 1,600 volunteers working in coastal and inland habitats all over Australia. 

The National Shorebird Monitoring program (started as the Shorebirds 2020 project initiated to re-invigorate monitoring around Australia) is raising awareness of how incredible shorebirds are, and actively engaging the community to participate in gathering information needed to conserve shorebirds. 

In the short term, the destruction of tidal ecosystems will need to be stopped, and our program is designed to strengthen the case for protecting these important habitats. 

In the long term, there will be a need to mitigate against the likely effects of climate change on a species that travels across the entire range of latitudes where impacts are likely. 

The identification and protection of critical areas for shorebirds will need to continue in order to guard against the potential threats associated with habitats in close proximity to nearly half the human population. 

Here in Australia, the place where these birds grow up and spend most of their lives, continued monitoring is necessary to inform the best management practice to maintain shorebird populations. 

BirdLife Australia believe that we can help secure a brighter future for these remarkable birds by educating stakeholders, gathering information on how and why shorebird populations are changing, and working to grow the community of people who care about shorebirds.

To find out more visit: http://www.birdlife.org.au/projects/shorebirds-2020/shorebirds-2020-program