November 1 - 30, 2026: Issue 660

 

A return to pen and paper + Digital detox in schools, curriculum reform and the establishment of a teaching and learning commission: Education Ministers November 2026 Meeting

Photo: AJG/PON

Return to Pen + Paper

On Monday November 2 the NSW Government announced it will request the Commonwealth, state, and territory governments consider moving back to handwritten writing tests for students in Years 5, 7, and 9, after recent NAPLAN results reinforced a national decline in writing.


The Government’s push for NAPLAN writing tests to return to pen and paper from 2028 will be on the agenda when national Education Ministers meet on Monday, 2 November.

Currently, Year 3 students complete their writing test on paper, while older students sit the test on a computer.

The Minns Labor Government is leading a renewed national focus on handwriting as concerns grow that the prolonged use of technology in schools is having a negative impact on student learning.

Teachers, principals, and parents have already shared their concerns that online testing in primary school does not reflect the fact that most classroom learning takes place offline.

The Government stated it 'is taking action to address these concerns and ensure an entire generation of students does not miss out on essential educational foundations.'

This includes the introduction of limits on the amount of time students spend on screens in NSW public schools, helping curb excessive screen use, improve attention, and lift educational outcomes.

New guidelines recommend a minimum of one hour a day of learning using pen and paper, reflecting strong evidence of the benefits of writing by hand and reading from paper.

These policies build on and complement actions already taken by the Minns Labor Government to reduce reliance on technology and limit distractions, beginning with the ban on mobile phones in 2023 and recent restrictions on take-home assessments for HSC students to combat the use of AI.

The NSW government’s own research fund assessing the impact of screen use on learning found that only around one-third of parents of primary-school aged children indicated that the benefits of using technology outweigh the disadvantages.

Schools that have already adopted a digital-free approach to learning are seeing the benefits flow through to better educational outcomes.

Deputy Premier of New South Wales and Minister for Education and Early Learning Prue Car said:

“The Minns Labor Government is committed to ensuring New South Wales students build strong foundational writing skills that will set them up for long-term success.

“The evidence from our classrooms points clearly to the ongoing value of handwriting and its importance for student development and engaging a different way of learning.

“We’re listening to teachers and families who want a sensible, balanced approach to technology use in schools.”

Communique – Education Ministers Meeting – Monday 2 November 2026

The Hon Jason Clare MP, Federal Minister for Education, released the following on Thursday November 5:

The Education Ministers Meeting (EMM) met on 2 November 2026.

Digital detox

Ministers discussed the need for a digital detox in Australian schools and agreed that technology adoption and the use of AI in schools should be evidence-based, purposeful and advance student learning and wellbeing. Ministers agreed that student use of technology should be restricted when it fails to support these purposes.

Ministers also agreed to introduce, trial or consider limits on screen use in schools and restrict the student use of Generative AI in primary schools and secondary student assessments, with states and territories, and sectors to determine implementation.

Ministers agreed to establish a new Australian Schools Digital Detox Taskforce (the Taskforce) to provide advice to Ministers on further practical actions that could be taken to address screen and digital device use. The Taskforce will be led by an independent expert with representatives from state and territory governments, the independent and Catholic education sectors, National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Education Corporation (NATSIEC), parent and principal associations, workforce representatives and the education agencies: Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA), Education Services Australia (ESA), Australian Education Research Organisation (AERO) and the Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL). The taskforce will also seek advice and engage with students, teachers, schools, researchers and industry experts.

Ministers agreed that responding to these issues is a national priority, and that digital devices and AI will remain a standing EMM agenda item until at least the end of 2027, and will include consideration of advice from the Taskforce.

Mathematics curriculum reform

Ministers agreed to amend the Australian Curriculum: Mathematics Foundation to Year 2 mathematics, following the work conducted by ACARA. The revised mathematics curriculum will:

  • refine content descriptions to enhance clarity and explicitly prioritise the essential knowledge, understanding and skills that students should learn;
  • sequence content to ensure students develop key foundational mathematical concepts;
  • align the achievement standards to the revised content; and
  • clearly articulate the foundational mathematical concepts that support students to develop consumer and financial literacy in age-appropriate ways.

Ministers agreed to implement the revised mathematics content in schools from 2027 and be implemented by the end of 2029 with the year of implementation to be determined by individual jurisdictions.

ACARA will commence an iterative review of the Australian Curriculum: Years 3 to 6 mathematics curriculum, which will also include consumer and financial literacy.

Creation of the Australian Teaching and Learning Commission

Education Ministers agreed to establish an Australian Teaching and Learning Commission (the Commission) that will bring together, and build upon, the existing functions of ACARA, AITSL, AERO and ESA.

The Commission will bring together, in a single national agency, expertise in curriculum, assessment, teaching, teaching standards, research, evidence, data, technology and implementation support, making it easier to connect what we know works with the practical resources and support available to teachers and schools. This will deliver better support for teachers, school leaders, systems and sectors and help improve student results.

Detailed implementation arrangements will be worked through with the four national education organisations and other stakeholders over the coming months. This will ensure the continuity of important services and programs and support a smooth and orderly transition with a focus on agency staff wellbeing. The Commission will commence following passage of legislation in the Commonwealth parliament.

NAPLAN reform

Ministers agreed the Year 5 NAPLAN writing assessment will return to handwritten completion in 2028, subject to further advice from ACARA on the feasibility, costs and workload implications of implementation.

Ministers also agreed ACARA would provide advice on returning to handwritten NAPLAN writing assessments for Years 7 and 9, and providing advice on handwritten NAPLAN numeracy assessments for years 3 and 5.

Antisemitism, Islamophobia and social cohesion

Ministers agreed to reforms to the Australian curriculum to assist schools to prevent and address antisemitism.

Ministers agreed that implementation of these curriculum changes would begin from 2027 and be finalised by the end of 2029, with the year of implementation to be determined by individual jurisdictions.

Ministers were briefed on the progress of the Antisemitism Education Taskforce by the Chair Mr David Gonski AC and the Special Envoy to Combat Antisemitism Ms Jillian Segal AO. Ministers were also briefed by the Special Envoy to Combat Islamophobia Mr Aftab Malik. 

Ministers welcomed ongoing efforts to strengthen social cohesion through education and look forward to this work being progressed by the Social Cohesion Education Advisory Council, which will be chaired by Mr Gonski to continue social cohesion initiatives.

Civics education reform

Ministers discussed the importance of civics and citizenship education and agreed to task ACARA with advising education ministers on incorporating Year 9 and 10 Civics and Citizenship content as core Australian Curriculum expectations for all students.

This would be subject to identifying existing content to be removed or streamlined and evaluating the impacts on teacher workload.

Reform of initial teacher education

In December 2023, Education Ministers introduced core content requirements for Initial Teacher Education (ITE) programs to strengthen teacher training in Australia. Core content, which is embedded in every ITE program that has enrolled students this year, is intended to ensure that everyone who studies teaching gains a deep understanding of how the brain and learning works, effective pedagogical practices, classroom management and responsive teaching.

Ministers heard from the Acting Chair of the ITE Quality Assurance Oversight Board, Professor Bill Louden, on the Board’s work to quality assure implementation of the core content  across the nation.

Ministers agreed to the ITE Data Dashboard being published on the AITSL website.

Ministers also considered the findings of the ITE Perceptions Survey, which will provide a baseline for measuring the impact of core content reforms in future years. This will be published on the Australian Government Department of Education website.

Consent and respectful relationships education

Education Ministers responded to the National Cabinet’s tasking on Consent and Respectful Relationships Education (CRRE), reaffirming their commitment to a shared goal of ending violence against women and children, and agreeing to develop a five-year workplan (from 2027) informed by the evaluation of the current CRRE measure.

Ministers discussed the importance of a safe and respectful society and ways to strengthen the delivery of CRRE and considered the evidence and experiences in jurisdictions supporting a comprehensive whole-school approach to CRRE. The Australian Government is providing $77.6 million to states and territories and non-government school sectors to help schools invest in RRE tailored to their communities. This is being delivered in partnership with states, territories, and non-government school sectors.

First Nations Teacher and School Leader Strategy

Education Ministers considered the working draft of the First Nations Teacher and School Leader Strategy. The draft Strategy has been developed in consultation with First Nations education stakeholders, states and territories, and the non-government sector. It aligns with the objectives of the Closing the Gap National Agreement targets 5, 6 and 7, and the Better and Fairer Schools Agreements target to increase the number of domestic students enrolled in ITE who identify as Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander by 10 percentage points, by 2035.

The draft Strategy will be released for consultation, with NATSIEC, working with other First Nations peaks, leading consultation with First Nations stakeholders. The final Strategy will be brought back to EMM for consideration in 2027, prior to public release.

Equity in education

South Australia presented a paper on equity in education for Ministers’ consideration. Ministers reaffirmed that a shared understanding of equity is necessary to provide a common foundation for national reform design. Ministers agreed on a shared understanding of equity, to be published following EMM, and noted it could be used to guide national decision-making and the ongoing work of establishing the Commission and the National Enabling Initiatives under the Better and Fairer Schools Agreement. Jurisdictions retain flexibility to determine their policy approaches.

Child safety update

Ministers considered findings from the National Assessment of CCTV use in ECEC settings (the Assessment). The Assessment was supported by an Expert Reference Panel comprising the Australian Federal Police (AFP), the Australian Centre for Child Protection (ACCP), as well as other privacy and surveillance experts, and was based on information collected from more than 300 services.

Ministers agreed to develop national best practice guidance.

Ministers also agreed to further reforms to strengthen supervision arrangements, including regulatory change to define factors relevant in determining and assessing whether supervision is adequate, and progressing the next stage of Working Towards Qualification reforms by developing a voluntary National Model Code for when educators working towards a qualification may be counted in educator-to-child ratios.

Early Education and Care Commission

Ministers were briefed on stakeholder consultation undertaken on a potential National Early Education and Care Commission (EEC Commission) since their initial decision to explore this reform in July 2026.

Ministers agreed that the purpose of the proposed national EEC Commission will be “to improve outcomes for children by working with governments to provide national leadership to ensure the safety, rights and best interests of children are paramount, and strengthen transparency, accountability and public confidence in the ECEC sector through better evidence and insights into system performance, quality, safety, and outcomes.”

Ministers agreed to an approach to effective stewardship of the ECEC system, including shared principles and characteristics to guide how governments, a potential Commission and the sector could work together to steward the system.

Ministers also agreed-in-principle the key functions of a proposed national EEC including analytics and insights on supply and demand, market shape and workforce development, and a strategic approach to quality safety and regulation of the sector. Minister Clare and Minister Walsh have acknowledged on behalf of all Education Ministers the resignation of the current ACECQA Board Chair, Ms Annette Whitehead, and thanked her for her leadership and service. Education Ministers tasked officials with developing a proposal for a new ACECQA Board Chair.

Education Ministers will meet again in 2027.

Following the release of the above Communique, The Hon Jason Clare MP, Australian Minister for Education, released the following statement:

Digital detox in schools, curriculum reform and the establishment of a teaching and learning commission

Education Ministers have agreed to a digital detox in Australian schools and a package of reforms to strengthen children’s learning and support the teachers that teach them.

At the Education Ministers Meeting this week, ministers agreed:

  • a digital detox in Australian schools;
  • curriculum reform to strengthen the teaching of Australian maths and financial literacy and antisemitism, as well as looking at making civics compulsory in Years 9 and 10;
  • and the establishment of the Australian Teaching and Learning Commission.

Digital detox in schools

The evidence is showing us that the more time kids spend online the more likely it is that their results decline.

That’s why Education Ministers agreed to set or consider screen time limits in schools across the country.

Given the risks to children’s learning, ministers also agreed to restrict the use of generative artificial intelligence in primary schools and secondary school assessments.

Kids need to learn to think for themselves and there’s some evidence that AI can undermine this by causing cognitive stunting.

A new Australian Schools Digital Detox Taskforce will provide advice on further steps to address excessive screen time and digital device use.

The Digital Detox Taskforce will collect the evidence, survey students, teachers and parents, and provide us with advice on what further action we should take next year.

Education Ministers have also decided to return NAPLAN writing tests in Year 5, to pen and paper. This will mean that NAPLAN better tests primary school kids’ proficiency in writing without the distraction of a screen.

See the Department of Education of the Australian Government report: A DIGITAL DETOX, November 2026

Stronger foundations in maths and financial literacy

Education Ministers agreed to roll out changes from next year to the curriculum for the first three years of maths.

The changes make it simpler and clearer on what students need to learn and in what order.

That’s important because maths is sequential. To build knowledge you have to learn certain things before you learn others.

It includes supporting kids’ development of age appropriate financial literacy.

Ministers have now tasked ACARA with the next targeted curriculum review, looking at the maths curriculum for Years 3 to 6, including a bigger focus on financial literacy.

Making civics compulsory

Democracy doesn’t run on autopilot. We need to teach kids what it is and what it requires.

Research by ACARA has shown we need to improve high school students’ understanding of our democracy.

It shows general knowledge about civics has dropped to its lowest level since testing began in 2004.

That’s why we have asked ACARA to provide advice on making Civics and Citizenship content compulsory across the country in Years 9 and 10.

This would mean every high school student learns about the Constitution, how laws are made, how the legal system works, how democracy works, how Australia works.

Tackling antisemitism

Following the Bondi attack, we said we would review the National Curriculum to strengthen understanding of the evils of antisemitism and the horrors of the Holocaust.

The Antisemitism Education Taskforce endorsed recommendations by ACARA and Education Ministers have now agreed to them and they will start next year.

The changes include understanding of Jewish history and culture and the contributions Jewish Australians have made to our country.

These changes are important but there is always more we can do to stamp out racism in all its noxious forms.

The Social Cohesion Education Advisory Council, to be chaired by David Gonski AC, will progress further work to strengthen social cohesion through education.

It will also provide advice on how to better embed the teaching of Australian values into the curriculum.

Establishing the Teaching and Learning Commission

We have agreed to establish the Australian Teaching and Learning Commission.

This will be a new single body responsible for the national curriculum, national testing, national teacher standards, teacher training and research.

Teachers don’t experience those four things separately. They experience it together in the classroom.

This will make it easier and simpler for teachers and schools to get the information, resources and support they need.

The Commission will bring under one roof:

  • the Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA);
  • the Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL);
  • the Australian Education Research Organisation (AERO); and
  • Education Services Australia (ESA).

The Commission would allow for greater co-ordination between different areas of the school education system, with the whole being greater than the sum of its parts.

It will also help support the key reforms being rolled out across schools through the Better and Fairer Schools Agreement.

The Australian Minister for Education, the Hon. Jason Clare, stated:

“We have signed long-term agreements with every state and territory to fix the funding of our public schools.

“That funding is tied to reforms that we know work: things like phonics and phonics checks, numeracy checks and small group tutoring.

“Today we’re announcing the next stage of reforms to help our kids learn and to support our teachers.

“A digital detox in schools restricting screen time and the use of AI.

“Strengthening the way we teach maths to the youngest students so they get this essential life skill.

“Bringing under one roof a body that’s responsible for the national curriculum, national testing, national teacher standards, teacher training and research.

“This will make it easier and simpler for teachers and schools to get the information, resources and support they need.

“Schools don’t just teach numeracy, literacy and critical thinking skills. They also build character.

“We have to make sure our students are learning about our democracy and Australian values.

“We’re strengthening the curriculum here too, including taking a look at compulsory civics in High School.” Mr. Clare said

Australian classrooms are getting a ‘digital detox’ – what does this mean for schools and students?

A group of school students sitting on a staircase. One is using a smartphone and the other is using a laptop.
GettyImages. Rawpixel/Getty Images
Jason M. Lodge, The University of Queensland

The federal government is pushing for a “digital detox” in schools.

In a new report, it outlines growing concerns about the use of digital technologies in classrooms. This includes concerns about artificial intelligence (AI) harming children’s critical thinking, concentration and problem-solving skills.

The government now plans to reduce the time students spend on screens and limit AI use at school to improve learning. Education Minister Jason Clare told ABC Radio National on Thursday,

I’m not making the argument here to burn the iPads […] but I am saying that there’s a pretty good argument here for more pen and paper and less tech.

This position reverses a decades-long trend of expanding the use of digital technologies in Australian classrooms.

What does this report mean for schools? And what’s missing in our discussion about screens in schools so far?

What’s in the report?

State and federal education ministers have agreed to consider national limits on screen use. This builds on screen-time limits already flagged in New South Wales and Victoria and soon to be piloted in Western Australia. It also follows international examples such as Norway and New York.

The report also flags:

  • some of the Year 5 NAPLAN tests will return to a written assessment (it is currently all done online)

  • a new taskforce to look at “digital detoxing” in schools, set to report to ministers three times next year, and

  • generative AI to be restricted in primary schools and for high school assessments.

The argument for making these changes is that educational technology should be used to support effective teaching, but not replace it. The report says,

when technology is used, it should be for a purpose, including supporting student learning and wellbeing, and if it causes harm, it should be restricted.

What does this mean for schools?

In practical terms, these changes will mean less emphasis on technology, with a return to pens and paper. And teachers will increasingly have hard limits on the amount of time they can use technology in lessons, particularly in primary schools.

For some teachers, this may require a complete revamp of their teaching practices. For others, there may be no noticeable difference as they are not using technology much currently.

There is no comprehensive national data on how much time Australian children spend on devices at school.

The rules around tech use have been just as patchy. For example, phone bans are implemented at state level. Almost everything else has been decided school by school, including whether students bring a laptop and which AI tools they can use.

What does the research say?

The evidence around how much technology is optimal for learning is also mixed.

Recent international test results suggest 15-year-old students who use devices moderately for learning do better than both heavy users and non-users. But given so few students now go without technology, critics argue the comparison with non-users does not tell us anything particularly useful.

Research also suggests raising the bar for the use of educational technologies (which most of the time means screens) makes sense. For decades, we have lacked sufficient evidence of their positive impact on learning.

For example, a 2015 OECD analysis found countries that had invested heavily in computers for schools saw no appreciable improvement in students’ reading, maths or science scores.

Tech can help, but …

That isn’t to say technology never helps. Used for something specific, such as more targeted practice or more precise feedback, it can improve learning.

But there has not been enough onus on those selling technologies to schools to demonstrate their positive impact on learning. Instead, implementation decisions are often made on the basis of pilots and word of mouth.

And with the introduction of generative AI and AI agents, concerns have moved beyond a lack of evidence around the positive impact of technology on learning to a concern about negative impacts.

Discussions about students using AI to offload their learning have dominated global conversations in education. The main concern is AI use will lead to “cognitive stunting”, where repeated use of the technology can weaken learning and thinking skills.

UNESCO has published arguments that “cognitive friction” – or struggle – is where real learning happens. In September, at a global meeting, education ministers called for AI that makes learners reason and do the “hard thinking” work themselves.

What next?

But while this latest report is a step in the right direction, we need more planning and more information.

Whether we like it or not, technology (including AI) is increasingly part of the world young people live in and will work in. It’s now almost unavoidable if you use Google, for example.

One of the major questions the new taskforce will need to address is: when are the appropriate times and circumstances to integrate technologies into classrooms?

Students will increasingly be interacting with technologies such as AI as soon as they walk out of the school gates (if they aren’t already). Preparing them to survive and thrive in this new era of AI is an important job for schools.

A complete technology ban across all of primary and secondary schooling is not what is being suggested by the government. So, questions about how and when remain open.

We need to do a lot more research and thinking to truly ensure our education and training systems are appropriate for the age of AI.

As world leaders Singapore and Estonia have shown, this will require investing in teachers and using tools designed for learning, rather than just churning out answers.The Conversation

Jason M. Lodge, Director of the Learning, Instruction & Technology Lab and Professor of Educational Psychology, School of Education, The University of Queensland

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.